Jump to content

Matusz 2011, Tillman 2017, Harvey 2021


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Another dishonorable mention:

1998 Doug Drabek 23 G, 21 GS, 7.29 ERA, and gave up 20 home runs in 108.2 innings pitched. 

Was the 2009 Adam Eaton Experience too brief to get mentioned here?

8 starts, 8.56 ERA, 9 home runs in 41 innings, 1.829 WHIP.  I get the shakes just thinking about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Orioles Jim said:

Dishonorable mention:

2006 Russ Ortiz 20 G, 5 GS, 8.48 ERA, FIP 8.33

There are some important differences with Ortiz. Unlike Harvey et al, the O's did not go into the season with Ortiz even on their radar after a poor 2005 with the D-backs. He was a desperation signing near the end of June, 2006 prompted by newly-arrived supposed pitching guru Leo Mazzone's exasperation with the Oriole pitching staff and training up and down the franchise (outside of Bedard), which he openly considered incompetent and irreparable. After all, Ortiz had had six seasons of success under Mazzone at Atlanta up until a year and a half before--why not see if they could recapture the magic? Also, I had the sense that Mazzone, unable to fix the bad pitching quickly, felt humiliated after such a long and illustrious career with the Braves and made a panicked move to wrap himself in past glory.

Different from and more understandable than going into a season counting on someone unreliable to be your number 2 or 3 starter (Harvey, Jiminez, Gallardo, etc.).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LA2 said:

There are some important differences with Ortiz. Unlike Harvey et al, the O's did not go into the season with Ortiz even on their radar after a poor 2005 with the D-backs. He was a desperation signing near the end of June, 2006 prompted by newly-arrived supposed pitching guru Leo Mazzone's exasperation with the Oriole pitching staff and training up and down the franchise (outside of Bedard), which he openly considered incompetent and irreparable. After all, Ortiz had had six seasons of success under Mazzone at Atlanta up until a year and a half before--why not see if they could recapture the magic? Also, I had the sense that Mazzone, unable to fix the bad pitching quickly, felt humiliated after such a long and illustrious career with the Braves and made a panicked move to wrap himself in past glory.

Different from and more understandable than going into a season counting on someone unreliable to be your number 2 or 3 starter (Harvey, Jiminez, Gallardo, etc.).

 

I remember Mazzone saying, I believe it was, that it was an “arm slot” issue with Ortiz that had been hexing him and that he thought he could fix it. I remember that being roundly ridiculed here, and hoping against hope that the pitching Oracle of Mazzone would be able to fix that.

Like most things during that era of the Orioles, I was left quite disappointed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Is he injured?  I hadn't heard that he's injured.

I interpret IL eligibility very liberally. He's either broken physically or mentally. Either way, he needs a reset. Might not work, but he's broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

I interpret IL eligibility very liberally. He's either broken physically or mentally. Either way, he needs a reset. Might not work, but he's broken.

Just be careful not to complain about steroids, sign stealing or sticky balls.  ?

Cheating is cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Just be careful not to complain about steroids, sign stealing or sticky balls.  ?

Cheating is cheating.

If he's relying on cheating or is generally unable to compete at this level any longer, you just cut him. My IL idea is essentially a last-ditch effort to reset, reduce his tension and restart one more time. If he can't do that, cut the guy. 

I don't mean to be cold about it, but he doesn't deserve special treatment just because his name is Matt Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...