Jump to content

Jorge Mateo 2021


interloper

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Urias? Solid defense, high walk rate and .760 OPS. He doesn't have Mateo's crazy athleticism but still seems like at least a utility guy with possible upside as everyday 2B. I love his AB's on a team that sorely needs hitters with plate discipline. 

I could see Urias starting at 2B or 3B next year.  Agree with Tony that Mateo looks like a starting SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked this question about Mateo, but I could easily ask you about any of our successful pick ups… Well, both of our successful pick ups, ha ha. Is he doing well enough to shift our focus in the upcoming rule 5 draft?

I was expecting we would look for good solid infielders, because what we have is poor, or pitching possibilities, But because of our own plethora of pitching possibilities, the middle infield would be more likely. Is Mateo good enough to shift that focus? Or is it too early to tell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Urias? Solid defense, high walk rate and .760 OPS. He doesn't have Mateo's crazy athleticism but still seems like at least a utility guy with possible upside as everyday 2B. I love his AB's on a team that sorely needs hitters with plate discipline. 

Urias is more a of utility guy than a real piece for me. He's probably second amongst the position players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a ton to add but I'll say this: You hear about a guy like Mateo with all his tools and a lack of success at the MLB eventually exposing him to waivers, and you assume he must have a bad approach.

I found the opposite to be true.  He has a solid approach, and has been having good abs almost every plate appearance.

Likewise, in the field, you kind of expect to see some poor fundamentals.  He made an E last night, but he looks a solid ss to me.  He's not Shawon Dunston.

I want him to get 500-600 abs next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I asked this question about Mateo, but I could easily ask you about any of our successful pick ups… Well, both of our successful pick ups, ha ha. Is he doing well enough to shift our focus in the upcoming rule 5 draft?

I was expecting we would look for good solid infielders, because what we have is poor, or pitching possibilities, But because of our own plethora of pitching possibilities, the middle infield would be more likely. Is Mateo good enough to shift that focus? Or is it too early to tell?

If there is a consensus best player I would consider picking that player no matter the position.  Otherwise, given our pitching, I'd repeat what we did this past year and take 2 more pitchers that profile as starters long-term and see if one can stick in the BP next season.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jammer7 said:

I think that changed to worst record, regardless of league, a few years ago. Maybe I am wrong. 

Nope, we couldn't claim JB Wendelken when Oakland cut him; Arizona had a worse record than us at the time and they got him, even though we are AL and Arizona is NL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I surely didn't expect a 113 OPS+ in his first 105 plate appearances here and just 1 error in his first 16 games, but now... I'm kinda expecting him to keep it up and maybe even improve offensively.  The talent was always there - he was a top 100 prospect (sometimes top 30) from 2016 through 2018.  He just didn't develop as quickly as most expected him to.  But ya watch the guy play, and the tools are so obvious, and he knows this is his opportunity of a lifetime.  I hope to the baseball Gods that I'm not jinxing him, but I think he'll get better, and this is not a Felix Pie situation.        

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...