Jump to content

Most ridiculous doubleheader loss ever?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Are they under the impression that if there’s a tie between us and Arizona they use run differential to determine the first pick? Or perhaps we’re not very good?

Well when one team has talent, and is actively trying to win and the other team doesn't have much talent and isn't actively trying to win...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The time of today's game is listed in the box score as 3:26.  It was scheduled to start at 1:05, so if it started on time it ended at 4:31.  Yesterday's first game was scheduled for 4:35.

So it appears we gave up 44 runs in 24 hours.  I wonder if that is a major league record?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, SteveA said:

The time of today's game is listed in the box score as 3:26.  It was scheduled to start at 1:05, so if it started on time it ended at 4:31.  Yesterday's first game was scheduled for 4:35.

So it appears we gave up 44 runs in 24 hours.  I wonder if that is a major league record?

Yes, it started exactly at 1:05 and ended at 4:31. So you are correct, the Jays scored 44 runs in less than 24 hours. Amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Numbers wise, this may have even been worse than 30-3 shellacking at the hands of the Rangers in 9 innings.

The Blue Jays scored 33 runs in only 7 innings..... 11 in the last inning of the previous game and 22 through the first 6 innings of this abomination. That is a pace for 42 runs in 9 innings.

In the esteemed words of Col. Kurtz..... The horror......   The horror.......

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Oh, I thought you were taking about his hitting in high leverage situations. 
    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...