Jump to content

Seems like OPACY was more hitter-friendly than ever this year


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Okay, maybe not “ever,” because I only looked at the last 10 years.   But right now, with three road games to play, our offense has scored 74 more runs at home than on the road, while allowing 86 more at home than on the road.   That’s a 160 differential; the final differential figures to be in the +115 to + 140 range.   The highest differential in the last 10 years was +113, for the 2012 Orioles.   Here’s a breakdown by year (RS differential, RA differential, total differential):

2012: +62, +51, +113

2013: +19, +21, +40

2014: -23, -23, -46

2015: +87, +5, +92

2016: +8, -43, -35

2017: +47, -27, +20

2018: +56, -70, -14

2019: -11, +83, +72

2020: +22, +59, +81 (projected for 162 games)

The homer differential this year is really drastic; the O’s have hit 122 at home, 70 on the road, while allowing 155 at home, 92 on the road.  

It’s a tough place to pitch, no doubt about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yankees hit 20 homers at OPACY, next highest road park was 9.

The Red Sox hit 19 homers at OPACY, next highest road park was 11.

The Rays hit 25 homers at OPACY, next highest road park was 13.

The Jays were more equal opportunity, hitting 21 homers at OPACY, Yankee Stadium and Fenway.   

That’s 85 homers against us at OPACY by the AL East teams in 38 games, compared to 70 hit by our other opponents in 43 games.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to how homer-happy the stadium is, I think you need to look at the no-doubters...the ones that would leave any park.  I know they keep track of this, I just don't know where to look for it.

And then look at the homers given up that would be out of 50% of parks, 25% of parks, etc.  

But overall, if we had better pitching, we wouldn't be giving up as many homers.  I know Camden Yards is a small park that's offense friendly but I'm betting a lot of homers given up by our pitchers would be out in most parks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

In regards to how homer-happy the stadium is, I think you need to look at the no-doubters...the ones that would leave any park.  I know they keep track of this, I just don't know where to look for it.

And then look at the homers given up that would be out of 50% of parks, 25% of parks, etc.  

But overall, if we had better pitching, we wouldn't be giving up as many homers.  I know Camden Yards is a small park that's offense friendly but I'm betting a lot of homers given up by our pitchers would be out in most parks.  

True, but that doesn’t explain allowing 155 homers at home and only 92 on the road.   It’s the same lousy pitchers (more or less).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

True, but that doesn’t explain allowing 155 homers at home and only 92 on the road.   It’s the same lousy pitchers (more or less).    

How many pitches thrown at home vs. the road?  Again, not sure where to look.  

You're probably right, Camden Yards is a bandbox.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

How many pitches thrown at home vs. the road?  Again, not sure where to look.  

Now that is a split I’ve never seen.   I do know that at present, our opponents have had 3217 PA at OPACY, 2908 in their home parks (figure that gap will close by 100-120 this weekend).   It stands to reason that the PA are higher at OPACY, because the better a team hits, the more PA they get.   So, my assumption would be the pitch count is higher too.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Now that is a split I’ve never seen.   I do know that at present, our opponents have had 3217 PA at OPACY, 2908 in their home parks (figure that gap will close by 100-120 this weekend).   It stands to reason that the PA are higher at OPACY, because the better a team hits, the more PA they get.   So, my assumption would be the pitch count is higher too.   

That's still not enough of a gap to justify 155 homers at home vs. 92 on the road.  Even if you were to take the average pitch per plate appearance and figure that into the difference between 3217 and 2908, I don't think that justifies a 60~ homer gap.  

Dunno, just thinking out loud.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

That's still not enough of a gap to justify 155 homers at home vs. 92 on the road.  Even if you were to take the average pitch per plate appearance and figure that into the difference between 3217 and 2908, I don't think that justifies a 60~ homer gap.  

No, I think the gap is largely the ballpark.   It’s always been homer-friendly, but it seems more extreme than usual this year.  Mullins has 22 of his 30 homers at home; Mountcastle 22 of 33; Santander 15 of 18.    In addition to having 122 homers at home vs. 70 on the road, the O’s have a .760/.652 OPS split home vs. road.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

True, but that doesn’t explain allowing 155 homers at home and only 92 on the road.   It’s the same lousy pitchers (more or less).    

The O's have 53 road losses and 54 home losses. Since this team is pretty bad, I'm assuming most of those road games are ending after the top of the ninth. That's only eight innings usually pitched by the the Orioles when they are losing on the road. So, you're talking about a guesstimate of about 50 fewer innings pitched by a crappy bullpen on the road versus Camden Yards.

I'd also be interested in how the weather this year might have impacted things. I felt like it was a more humid and hot summer than normal - which might contribute to things.

Overall though - you're right. Camden Yards as a whole seems more homer happy than normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Porky said:

The O's have 53 road losses and 54 home losses. Since this team is pretty bad, I'm assuming most of those road games are ending after the top of the ninth. That's only eight innings usually pitched by the the Orioles when they are losing on the road. So, you're talking about a guesstimate of about 50 fewer innings pitched by a crappy bullpen on the road versus Camden Yards.

This is a good point, regarding our opponents taking less at bats in their home park vs. OPACY.    Of course, the reverse also is true (though not as extreme) - the O’s bat in the 9th more often on the road than at home.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No, I think the gap is largely the ballpark.   It’s always been homer-friendly, but it seems more extreme than usual this year.  Mullins has 22 of his 30 homers at home; Mountcastle 22 of 33; Santander 15 of 18.    In addition to having 122 homers at home vs. 70 on the road, the O’s have a .760/.652 OPS split home vs. road.   

It is an unusual anomaly in the statistics, but did anything change at OPACY that would explain this? Looking at the yearly splits maybe something is different in 2021, but the 2019 Orioles pitcher gave up 45 more home runs at OPACY. 

If this trend repeats next year or remains the same when the pitching staff improves, then I'm more inclined to read more into this year's home run splits.

Orioles Hitters Home Run Splits

2016 Home: 131 Road: 122

2017 Home: 135 Road: 97

2018 Home: 100 Road: 88

2019 Home: 114 Road: 99

2020 Home: 45 Road: 32

2021 Home: 122 Road: 70

Orioles Pitcher Home Run Splits

2016 Home: 88 Road: 95

2017 Home: 127 Road: 115

2018 Home: 123 Road: 111

2019 Home: 175 Road: 130

2020 Home: 43 Road: 36

2021 Home: 155 Road: 92

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...