Jump to content

I'm already over this offseason.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Not much more than KG to go to the same team.  

Yeah, I dunno.  I still like the ERod contract the best.  I'd have given him 5/80 easily.  I really don't trust KG or Ray much going forward.  And 3/130 for Max is crazy.  At least Matz was a cheaper gamble but he has been bad outside of last year.  We gotta improve the rotation somehow.

Funny how Gausman, Davies, ERod, Bundy, Cobb, and Arrieta were all FAs at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't read every post so forgive me if this has been addressed. How much additional income does the team see by fielding a 70 win team vs a 50 win team. I'm sure it's not huge, but it does offset some of the expense of bringing in a few better players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yes.  He's a staunch union guy so he wanted to set a record before doomsday on Wednesday.

Rooting for the Braves to repeat in the division at least.  Would like to see Cohen flail about and continue to throw money at his problems.  I don't hate the Mets but if they want to be the NL Yankees, let them.

I think the Mets still are a strong candidate to go 79-83 next year. Not that as Orioles fans we have much to laugh at. But I do sleep better at night knowing Yankees fans must be going nuts right now with their team's Orioles like winter (as in no free agents being signed). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think the Mets still are a strong candidate to go 79-83 next year. Not that as Orioles fans we have much to laugh at. But I do sleep better at night knowing Yankees fans must be going nuts right now with their team's Orioles like winter (as in no free agents being signed). 

I agree, to an extent.  Health-permitting, the pitching will be great.  But it is fair to wonder if the offense was even upgraded significantly, and they are losing Conforto.  On a related note, I would make a call to see if Dominic Smith could be had for cheap, especially if the Orioles are trading/N-Ting Santander. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think the Mets still are a strong candidate to go 79-83 next year. Not that as Orioles fans we have much to laugh at. But I do sleep better at night knowing Yankees fans must be going nuts right now with their team's Orioles like winter (as in no free agents being signed). 

The Mets still need a lot to go their way.  DeGrom, as good as he is, seems to be pretty delicate.  IIRC, had to shut him down a few times during last season and finally for good in mid-July.  Scherzer's age is what it is.  Their season is toast if those guys don't perform to what they're capable of or spend significant amounts of time on the IL.  

But yes, schadenfreude at the Yankees not having a good offseason thus far.  You and I both know that it can change very quickly for them, however.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Wow, I thought Robbie Ray was returning to the Jays.  

He was someone I wanted us to consider this offseason, before he won the Cy Young and drove his price up.  I don't know if I like him at 5/115.  I think I might actually prefer the Gausman deal, strictly because Ray smacks of a guy who had a career year in a contract season.  Gausman has been good for two years (albeit a shortened 2020 season) in SF.  Can Gausman keep whatever magic he found in SF?  Remains to be seen.  Same with Ray.  

Really interesting offseason.

I thought you were over it already.  ?

I think the impending contract dispute is really accelerating the moves for a lot of teams.   I can’t ever remember this many significant deals happening before the winter meetings.   Seems like a lot of teams want their key pieces in place before the music stops.   And heavy emphasis on the pitchers.   

As to Gausman vs. Ray, I’d probably go with the latter because of what he was able to do in the AL East.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

I agree, to an extent.  Health-permitting, the pitching will be great.  But it is fair to wonder if the offense was even upgraded significantly, and they are losing Conforto.  On a related note, I would make a call to see if Dominic Smith could be had for cheap, especially if the Orioles are trading/N-Ting Santander. 

I see Mets fans saying on social media they will have deGrom and Scherzer start 60 out of 160 games in 2022. But will that really happen? deGrom is not a sure bet to make 30 starts and Scherzer is right on the edge of being to old to pitch a full season. 

Mets could have a very good season if those two pitch as advertise, but like you pointed out their offense could be an issue even with great pitching. 

Meanwhile we're waiting on Elias to sign our next Matt Harvey to fill out the rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I thought you were over it already.  ?

I think the impending contract dispute is really accelerating the moves for a lot of teams.   I can’t ever remember this many significant deals happening before the winter meetings.   Seems like a lot of teams want their key pieces in place before the music stops.   And heavy emphasis on the pitchers.   

As to Gausman vs. Ray, I’d probably go with the latter because of what he was able to do in the AL East.
 

Oh I'm over it from an Orioles fan perspective, for sure.  Here we are, sitting on our thumbs.  Can we even just get a decent reliever?  Sheesh.  

In regards to Gausman vs. Ray, I see your point.  It's pretty close to a coin flip for me, both guys have questions on whether their 2021 seasons are repeatable in new environments.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 

I see Mets fans saying on social media they will have deGrom and Scherzer start 60 out of 160 games in 2022. But will that really happen? deGrom is not a sure bet to make 30 starts and Scherzer is right on the edge of being to old to pitch a full season. 

Mets could have a very good season if those two pitch as advertise, but like you pointed out their offense could be an issue even with great pitching. 

Meanwhile we're waiting on Elias to sign our next Matt Harvey to fill out the rotation. 

It really, really sucks to be an Orioles fan.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

 

I see Mets fans saying on social media they will have deGrom and Scherzer start 60 out of 160 games in 2022. But will that really happen? deGrom is not a sure bet to make 30 starts and Scherzer is right on the edge of being to old to pitch a full season. 

Mets could have a very good season if those two pitch as advertise, but like you pointed out their offense could be an issue even with great pitching. 

Meanwhile we're waiting on Elias to sign our next Matt Harvey to fill out the rotation. 

Please, we all know its going to be Matt Harvey again. ERA under 7 = major league deal. Over 7 though is minor league deal with spring training 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...