Jump to content

Hey! KoolAid


owknows

Recommended Posts

Here's a thumbnail analysis/prediction thread from a dyed-in-the-wool Kool Aid drinking optimist.

By 2023... Without adding any notable free agents...

GRod and Means will be the top of the rotation.

Two of the following, will be solid (better than .500) middle/back end starters.. Hall, Lowther, Bradish, Baumann, Zimmermann

Pushing at their heels will be Rom, Baumler, Young, Pinto

Lot of long relief potential in the crew that doesn't make the rotation.

Other-worldly monster Felix Bautista as the stopper

Outfield will consist of Hays, Mullins, Stowers..  with Vavra as a util inf/outf (Kjerstad as an ever hopeful)

Infield Mountcastle, Urias, Henderson/Westburg, Mayo/Westburg

Adley behind the plate.

Mundy DH

 

This is a 90+ win team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, owknows said:

Here's a thumbnail analysis/prediction thread from a dyed-in-the-wool Kool Aid drinking optimist.

By 2023... Without adding any notable free agents...

GRod and Means will be the top of the rotation.

Two of the following, will be solid (better than .500) middle/back end starters.. Hall, Lowther, Bradish, Baumann, Zimmermann

Pushing at their heels will be Rom, Baumler, Young, Pinto

Lot of long relief potential in the crew that doesn't make the rotation.

Other-worldly monster Felix Bautista as the stopper

Outfield will consist of Hays, Mullins, Stowers..  with Vavra as a util inf/outf (Kjerstad as an ever hopeful)

Infield Mountcastle, Urias, Henderson/Westburg, Mayo/Westburg

Adley behind the plate.

Mundy DH

 

This is a 90+ win team

It wasn't Kool-Aid, it was Flavor-aid.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Mayo is in the majors in 2023.   But I do think Rom will be up sometime that year, for sure.   

90 win team without additions?  I doubt it.   These players need time to mature.   They’re not all going to be at their best by 2023.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I admire the optimism, but I don't know if there's recently been a 90 win team that's been pretty much made up of 100% guys promoted from within their own system.

That said, I agree with most of it, except the final 2/5 of the rotation consisting of Lowther, Bradish, Baumann, Zimmermann...I just don't see it.  But hopefully Hall is legit.  G-Rod, Means, Hall is a nice top 3.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it's more me than you.

 

I'll explain, in a roundabout way.

What's the story behind the drink the kool-aid saying?

In that incident they didn't actually drink Kool-aid.

It was Flavor aid.

 

Wow... I pride myself on recognition of obscure references... but wouldn't have gotten that one. I guess Jim Jones was a cheap owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I admire the optimism, but I don't know if there's recently been a 90 win team that's been pretty much made up of 100% guys promoted from within their own system.

 

I'm not sure there's recently been a team made up of 100% guys promoted from within.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I admire the optimism, but I don't know if there's recently been a 90 win team that's been pretty much made up of 100% guys promoted from within their own system.

That said, I agree with most of it, except the final 2/5 of the rotation consisting of Lowther, Bradish, Baumann, Zimmermann...I just don't see it.  But hopefully Hall is legit.  G-Rod, Means, Hall is a nice top 3.  

So you really don't see 1 (one) of Lowther, Baumann, Bradish, Zimmermann sticking as a starter?

I'd be shocked if that didn't hold.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm good with everything that Elias has done to date.  Sure, I'd have drafted differently but it looks like he added some nice talent, so, whatever.  I'm good with not adding (FA/trade) any vet position players or bullpen arms this year.  I am excited for all these kids to graduate.  All of that aside, they need to add at least one, and probably two, veteran starters in the next year, starting now.  Most of the deals handed out so far have been awful but I'd have happily given EdRod 5/80.  They are not going to win anything solely with the arms in the org and they aren't going to draft any pitchers going forward that can help by 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think any of the SP you listed besides Means and GRod should be relied upon. There might be 1 back end guy out of that group. The bullpen composition is completely unknown and Bautista is unlikely to be anything average or better. You might see Westburg up at the start of 23, but Gunnar is a long shot. That still isn’t a 90 win team. 75-80 at best, but that’s good enough to start adding some veteran FA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...