Jump to content

Rougned Odor 2022


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

He has a slash line of 197/256/390/646.  His OAA is -5.

You can argue he’s actually been worse than expected.  
 

He seems to be well liked by the players.  That’s about the best thing that can be said about him.

 

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

He's replacement level and he should have already been dropped to make room for the future.

 

I am well aware of his performance numbers and I said he is not good enough to keep.  He is literally a place holder.  But as placeholders go, I am ok with what he has delivered.  Just as I will be pleased when he is finally replaced.   Someone has to show up and play to win without looking over their shoulder until their position is taken.  That isn't very easy but it is better than no chance to win with people who are getting a chance but simply are not good enough.  You won't miss him when he is gone and neither will the Orioles. But I believe Elias and Hyde would say he has been a pretty strong addition for this turnaround season.  But when his replacement is ready he will be gone. And I concede that if either of you were in control, his replacement would have been brought up already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, foxfield said:

 

I am well aware of his performance numbers and I said he is not good enough to keep.  He is literally a place holder.  But as placeholders go, I am ok with what he has delivered.  Just as I will be pleased when he is finally replaced.   Someone has to show up and play to win without looking over their shoulder until their position is taken.  That isn't very easy but it is better than no chance to win with people who are getting a chance but simply are not good enough.  You won't miss him when he is gone and neither will the Orioles. But I believe Elias and Hyde would say he has been a pretty strong addition for this turnaround season.  But when his replacement is ready he will be gone. And I concede that if either of you were in control, his replacement would have been brought up already.

Well if I were in charge, he never would have been brought in to begin with.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odor has at least been consistent and provided stability. I think this signing has worked out. Even if a team does offer us a Cashner type return, I’d still like to hang onto him and finish the year strong, or at least until Elias is ready to turn over 2B to Vavra or Westburg. Urias has to prove he’s healthy. Those core injuries tend to linger in MLB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Odor has at least been consistent and provided stability. I think this signing has worked out. Even if a team does offer us a Cashner type return, I’d still like to hang onto him and finish the year strong, or at least until Elias is ready to turn over 2B to Vavra or Westburg. Urias has to prove he’s healthy. Those core injuries tend to linger in MLB. 

Consistency and stability?  He has been terrible.  I guess if that is what you are looking for, he has been consistent at that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Consistency and stability?  He has been terrible.  I guess if that is what you are looking for, he has been consistent at that!

I guess we all have our players we just don’t like. You’re entitled to your tastes. Urias has had a worst case scenario season so far. We haven’t had any better options. Odor has played good defense at 2B, and it seems(I’m not in the clubhouse) that he’s provided a positive vet presence. 
 

I’d much rather the O’s have Odor than be locked into the contracts that were given to Correa, Simien, and Seager. 
 

It’s really hard to complain about a waiver claim, a milb contract, or signing someone to a league minimum contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

I guess we all have our players we just don’t like. You’re entitled to your tastes. Urias has had a worst case scenario season so far. We haven’t had any better options. Odor has played good defense at 2B, and it seems(I’m not in the clubhouse) that he’s provided a positive vet presence. 
 

I’d much rather the O’s have Odor than be locked into the contracts that were given to Correa, Simien, and Seager. 
 

It’s really hard to complain about a waiver claim, a milb contract, or signing someone to a league minimum contract. 

He hasn't been terrible but I think we have multiple guys in the minors that would outperform him and they should be given the chance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He hasn't been terrible but I think we have multiple guys in the minors that would outperform him and they should be given the chance.

 

Odor has stabilized 2B the same way Chirnos held down C until AR got here. We’re actually paying Chirnos more money. I can’t find fault in Odor because he’s been our best, most realistic, 2B option all so far this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

Odor has stabilized 2B the same way Chirnos held down C until AR got here. We’re actually paying Chirnos more money. I can’t find fault in Odor because he’s been our best, most realistic, 2B option all so far this season. 

You don't think they have anyone in the minors that could exceed his performance?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I guess we all have our players we just don’t like. You’re entitled to your tastes. Urias has had a worst case scenario season so far. We haven’t had any better options. Odor has played good defense at 2B, and it seems(I’m not in the clubhouse) that he’s provided a positive vet presence. 
 

I’d much rather the O’s have Odor than be locked into the contracts that were given to Correa, Simien, and Seager. 
 

It’s really hard to complain about a waiver claim, a milb contract, or signing someone to a league minimum contract. 

Except he hasn’t provided good defense and what his makes is irrelevant at this point.

You need production and he is getting a lot of playing time and giving us very little to no production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Odor has stabilized 2B the same way Chirnos held down C until AR got here. We’re actually paying Chirnos more money. I can’t find fault in Odor because he’s been our best, most realistic, 2B option all so far this season. 

No he hasn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Baseball lives can be so funny.    End of next year, Gunnar will need 5 WAR to be where Rougned was at the end of his Age 22 season.

All 2.5 of those good seasons were in the track record when the Rangers guaranteed him his ~$50mm before 2017 Opening Day.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/03/rangers-close-to-extension-with-rougned-odor.html

Skimming that story, I hadn't thought about Jason Kipnis in awhile.

I remember Odor was considered a good comp for Schoop at the time.  There was talk of whether we should offer Schoop a comparable deal.   Schoop has been by far the better player, but he’s never earned more than $8.5 mm in a season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

41 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You don't think they have anyone in the minors that could exceed his performance?

 

He is basically a replacement level offensive player.  

The answer of course is yes.  But he is not here because they think he is better than someone else.  He is literally here until they think someone else is ready to be successful.  He will be gone soon enough.

I am much more interested in obtaining value from traded assets in the coming weeks than when Odor is gone.  One of those things could impact the future.  The other is largely irrelevant.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, foxfield said:

 

He is basically a replacement level offensive player.  

The answer of course is yes.  But he is not here because they think he is better than someone else.  He is literally here until they think someone else is ready to be successful.  He will be gone soon enough.

I am much more interested in obtaining value from traded assets in the coming weeks than when Odor is gone.  One of those things could impact the future.  The other is largely irrelevant.

 

I don't believe that.

Do you think that is the only criteria in play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

He hasn't been terrible but I think we have multiple guys in the minors that would outperform him and they should be given the chance.

 

He has a cool beard, and he seems to swing really hard. Plus he gave me a reason to send the GIF of him punching Bautista to my brother-in-law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't believe that.

Do you think that is the only criteria in play?

We’ll have a better basis to discuss this when the season is over and we know how players have performed over a longer period of time and whether they got called up or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...