Jump to content

The Westburg Theory


wildcard

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Although "Jordan Westburg" is two trochees, there are a lot of other stress patterns in this verse. For example, "The fans began to cool, the prospect hounds began to drool" is in remarkable iambic septameter (seven consecutive unstressed/stressed feet). Bravo!

Credit to the lyricist....its a copy paste of a famous pop song with a few words switched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, maybenxtyr said:

I don't either. 68ish wins is ok, but it's still terrible. 

 

You're generally going to win 54...lose 54... it's what they do in the other 54 that matters. 

 

81 wins is really hard to imagine next year. Outside of a few top end guys the minors looks pretty ordinary. Being this far in a rebuild and still not having any answers is sad.

Last year's team overachieved, since they won less than the 54 games any random team wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, maybenxtyr said:

Every single thing that has been done in the process has been about saving money. Any hope of contending should be based on this family selling the team. 

Unfortunately I believe this is true.  Waiting for a major move to prove me wrong.  Upping payroll, extending current players, signing major free agents.  I won't hold my breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem with the original post is the idea that playing Stowers instead of Mullins would be an upgrade to the offense.  Even if we disregard Stowers' slow start, I think the gap in pitching talent between AAA and MLB is currently so large that Stowers would struggle to hit .200 in the majors, at least as a rookie.  Look at what Adley Rutschman, Bobby Witt and Spenser Torkelson are doing in the majors.  Put differently, if you put Cedric Mullins in Norfolk, he would probably hit .400.  

That doesn't mean that we shouldn't promote Stowers.  If he's mastered AAA, then we'd might as well start him on the MLB learning curve, because it's probably going to take him a long time to acclimate to MLB pitching.   Short of an injury, the most likely way to create MLB playing time for him is to trade Trey Mancini.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Unfortunately I believe this is true.  Waiting for a major move to prove me wrong.  Upping payroll, extending current players, signing major free agents.  I won't hold my breath.

If that is true then why sign Jordan Lyles for $7 million?  I agree that is coming time to do some of the things you mentioned.  I think you can make a fair argument that up until now it made very little sense to spend any more money then they have.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, accinfo said:

If that is true then why sign Jordan Lyles for $7 million?  I agree that is coming time to do some of the things you mentioned.  I think you can make a fair argument that up until now it made very little sense to spend any more money then they have.  

A few things.

It's not likely to be 7M when it is all said and done.

They needed somebody to serve as a veteran presence in the rotation and eat some innings.

I'm one of those folks that think MLB instructed teams to sign guys right before the lockout to improve optics.

I will agree that it is an outlier, just not a very big one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

A few things.

It's not likely to be 7M when it is all said and done.

They needed somebody to serve as a veteran presence in the rotation and eat some innings.

I'm one of those folks that think MLB instructed teams to sign guys right before the lockout to improve optics.

I will agree that it is an outlier, just not a very big one.

Hopefully MLB kicked in some cash, because the O's are so strapped for money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
49 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The real question is will we call up Westburg before Gunnar?  

Or is the Thoroughbred Tandem AAA promotion a leading indicator of same MLB deal for the final month?   By September, hard to see much difference among any of Nevin, Mateo or Odor as roadblocks to anything.

I'd like to see Ramon Urias play his way back into more of a roadblock, but his 2022 has been Bottom 25% kind of season so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Or is the Thoroughbred Tandem AAA promotion a leading indicator of same MLB deal for the final month?   By September, hard to see much difference among any of Nevin, Mateo or Odor as roadblocks to anything.

I'd like to see Ramon Urias play his way back into more of a roadblock, but his 2022 has been Bottom 25% kind of season so far.

Urias is more of a speed bump than a roadblock for Gunnar and Westburg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you'll see Westburg and Henderson promoted together but who knows when that will be.   If it happens this season look for Odor to get moved before it happens.   Of course, the Orioles could surprise me and move Mateo or both Mateo and Odor.    I'm envisioning an infield of Henderson 3B, Mateo SS, and Westburg 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think you'll see Westburg and Henderson promoted together but who knows when that will be.   If it happens this season look for Odor to get moved before it happens.   Of course, the Orioles could surprise me and move Mateo or both Mateo and Odor.    I'm envisioning an infield of Henderson 3B, Mateo SS, and Westburg 2B.

I’d prefer someone who isn’t a black hole in the lineup at SS. 

I’m envisioning an infield of Henderson at SS, Westburg at 3B, and Urias at 2B to start out 2023 with Prieto possibly overtaking Urias at some point in the season.

Mateo can be your utility infielder/pinch runner. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think yesterday was the nail in the coffin for him being on the playoff roster, assuming we make it.
    • I feel that way, too. I keep thinking about 2005.  2005: 10 games over .500 on June 20th. 1st place, two games up.  Shortly after they went on a 2-16 skid, and their last game at .500 was at the the start of that awful home 4 game series in late July when the White Sox swept them, and Raffy was exposed as taking PEDs. They fell under .500 that series and kept on sinking.  2024: 24 games over .500 on June 20th. 2nd place, a half game back.  Then immediately lose five straight. Due to their great start, they can't finish 14 under .500, but the dive feels eerily similar with all of the injuries, dormant bats, and all happening at the same time of year.  The floor coming out from underneath them feels a lot like it. That team was cooked by late July and by the first week of August, Mazzilli got the axe. That won't happen with Hyde this time, as they had a fine start this year, but this can't happen two years in a row under him. 
    • I know …. Gotcha. Trade away Stowers & Norby for Garbage and pick up Rivera & Jiminez. And be surprised when you offense stinks. 
    • You could cut and paste this write up for about every team in the organization. 
    • It’s because the strategies that they are taught and employ work much better in the minors with pitchers with worse stuff and command than in the majors.  This, in turn, inflates their minor league stats.  The good news is that thus far after an adjustment period those players do seem to adjust and do well. 
    • This was the lineup today: The problem is injuries. Hyde didn't have to run out this sort of lineup in May or June. You can nitpick about whether these were the right nine to start, but these are the players on the roster right now and it's because guys who were here in the winning months are not available.
    • I think you agree Roy. The injuries are one thing, but combining them with the continual influx of rookies/ near-rookies - (as promising as they may be) creates instability.  Holliday, Cowser, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad, Povich, even Stowers.  The past two years: Rutschman and Henderson. One rookie, a solid unremarkable, yet reliable core that had been playing together for several years. Maybe Elias needs to answer for this. I’m not buying the injury excuse for position players. The pitching - amazing job for the injury plague (Kimbrel not included). Have to wonder if these injuries have something to do with the training staff don’t you?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...