Jump to content

2022 18th Round Pick (#527): Andrew Walters - P - (JR) Miami (FL)


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I feel pretty confident saying that McLean and Hicks aren't going to be signing for $1.2M over their slot values. 

We don't know the numbers yet, but there will be unspent pool money.

Are you counting the 5% over?

The Orioles have never gone over the pool cap.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Walters wanted $1.7M than I have to question who his advisor is.  Maybe he truly does want to play with his brother but that number is ridiculous.  The O’s took a chance on signing him but reality has to show up at some point with these players.  Hopefully for him he has a great year and improves his draft standing for next year.  Quite a gamble though as $1.7M is a very high slot number for next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, baltfan said:

It's not confederate money.  We took flyers on some guys.  The problem is that NIL deals can really help these guys make up what they might have lost.  

There isn't really much NIL money in baseball yet. My understanding is that at most, the very best players are making enough to fully cover their cost of attendance (given that all baseball scholarships are only partial scholarships). Would be happy to learn otherwise if you have any additional info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

No, the $1.2M doesn't count the 5 percent over.

Ok. I thought we had 700K to play with and I could definitely see McLean at 700K over slot.  Rhodes, in a similar situation was 600K over last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

1.2M  includes the slot 3 money.

They are probably trying to keep Mcleans bonus at no more than 1.2M.

The fact that Walters number was $1.7M suggests that $1.7M is pretty close to the exact maximum that the Orioles could have offered if they were willing to hit the overage limit (approximately $850K) while signing Walters, McLean and Hicks.

So my guess is that Walters representative believed/knew that McLean will/would sign for no more than $475K above slot, which is the most that the Orioles could have offered to stay under the 5 percent overage, while also paying Walters $1.7M. 

My guess is that right now they are circling back around to Mathes and Young to figure out whether they can drain the pool without going (much) into the overage.

Edited by MurphDogg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

McLean probably figures he’ll get around the same amount next year as he was offered this year. But other things in life matter besides money. In this case you’re asking him to forgo playing with his brother, earning his degree, and having a chance at the cws (something he values). The orioles and other teams weren’t willing to offer enough to buy him out of those experiences 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

The fact that Walters number was $1.7M suggests that $1.7M is pretty close to the exact maximum that the Orioles could have offered if they were willing to hit the overage limit (approximately $850K) while signing Walters, McLean and Hicks.

So my guess is that McLean and Hicks will/would sign for around $475K above slot, which is the most that the Orioles could have offered to stay under the 5 percent overage, while also paying Walters $1.7M. 

The overage was something like 800K.  The Orioles have 1.2M of pool money before signing McLean.  If they signed McLean for slot they still wouldn't have had 1.7M even using all of the overage money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, seak05 said:

McLean probably figures he’ll get around the same amount next year as he was offered this year. But other things in life matter besides money. In this case you’re asking him to forgo playing with his brother, earning his degree, and having a chance at the cws (something he values). The orioles and other teams weren’t willing to offer enough to buy him out of those experiences 

Walters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

There isn't really much NIL money in baseball yet. My understanding is that at most, the very best players are making enough to fully cover their cost of attendance (given that all baseball scholarships are only partial scholarships). Would be happy to learn otherwise if you have any additional info.

There might not be much NIL money, but if ever there was going to be some it would be to retain guys that were drafted.  Nonetheless, I get your point.  We will see how much possible money was left for him once, and if, McLean is signed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The overage was something like 800K.  The Orioles have 1.2M of pool money before signing McLean.  If they signed McLean for slot they still wouldn't have had 1.7M even using all of the overage money.

You're right, my mistake, I wasn't counting McLean's slot value in the pool.

If they signed McLean for slot, they could have offered Walters a maximum of approximately $1.4M before going over 5 percent so $1.7M was never a realistic ask.

I still expect there to be pool value remaining, as I would be pretty surprised if McLean gets a larger bonus than Fabian, but I have certainly been surprised at how signing bonuses have turned out before.

Edited by MurphDogg
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a huge failure on the Os part to not sign McClean.  Not because he’s some definite stud but because you need to know that number if you draft him.  They could have done a lot of other things.

I think he signs, so this will be a moot point.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

Walters wanted $1.7M, so all of the overslot dollars plus the 4.9 percent overage. Not surprising that the Orioles passed on that.

Wow, that's high second-round slot money, I can't imagine him getting selected that high next season. He'd have to be the among the top 5 relievers in the NCAA and also be in a generally weak draft class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...