Jump to content

Three minor leaguers that Elias may try to move at the deadline


wildcard

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, wildcard said:

You may be right but its a little soon for me to draw that conclusion.   He has a 250/368/396/764 vs lefties.  He is 25.  He was mostly a 1B in the minor but he as not played  much in the majors.  If Mancini leaves then he probably gets more time at 1B/DH if he hits.  With all the infielders and outfielders the O's have he probably will not be needed next year at those positions.  

Just too soon for me to make a decision on him.   I would like to see  him through the rest of the season.   However the O's probably make a decision this off season because he will be out of options and has to stay on the major league roster next year or be DFA'd.

I'm going to disagree. Nevin has slashed .200/.320/.297/.617 in 175 major league PAs which is what you probably expect for a guy who slashed .244/.324/.413/.736 in 559 AAA PAs and .251/.345/.399/.744 in 540 AA PAs. He just can't get to his solid raw power in games and hits way too many ground balls. For corner infielder, he should not be in the major leagues and if he's the option to play first base regularly, Elias has failed.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, pdiddy said:

They are fools if they don’t give healthy Diaz a good look.

I know people have some kind of love for this guy, but I really don't understand why.

In 329 AAA PAs over and a half season because of constant injuries, Dias has slashed .182/.271/.289/.559.

Since coming back from his latest injury, he's slashed .137/.279/.216/.494 in 61 PAs over 15 games.

Defensively he's probably similar to Santander. He's a below average runner and he still doesn't have a plan at the plate with pitchers after 2025 professional at bats!

So someone please tell me why there is desire to give him a look at the major league level?

Why are they fools for not giving this guy a chance?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm going to disagree. Nevin has slashed .200/.320/.297/.617 in 175 major league PAs which is what you probably expect for a guy who slashed .244/.324/.413/.736 in 559 AAA PAs and .251/.345/.399/.744 in 540 AA PAs. He just can't get to his solid raw power in games and hits way too many ground balls. For corner infielder, he should not be in the major leagues and if he's the option to play first base regularly, Elias has failed.

And I would just add that keeping Nevin around as a backup first baseman is ludicrous for all the reasons you just mentioned. Once Mancini gets traded, Mountcastle should play everyday, and let's be real, if he gets hurt, anybody can finish out the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

And I would just add that keeping Nevin around as a backup first baseman is ludicrous for all the reasons you just mentioned. Once Mancini gets traded, Mountcastle should play everyday, and let's be real, if he gets hurt, anybody can finish out the game. 

On top of it, Rutschman plays a pretty good 1B so on his off days from behind the plate, he could play there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

So someone please tell me why there is desire to give him a look at the major league level?

Why are they fools for not giving this guy a chance?

 

I'm not saying they should even give him a look over Stowers, but I think it's that he was the centerpiece in the Machado trade that has me reluctant to just bury him in AAA despite his lack of production. Doesn't make sense, but there it is.

Edited by Gentile4
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm going to disagree. Nevin has slashed .200/.320/.297/.617 in 175 major league PAs which is what you probably expect for a guy who slashed .244/.324/.413/.736 in 559 AAA PAs and .251/.345/.399/.744 in 540 AA PAs. He just can't get to his solid raw power in games and hits way too many ground balls. For corner infielder, he should not be in the major leagues and if he's the option to play first base regularly, Elias has failed.

Exactly what I was going to post.  If for some reason Nevin is first on the depth chart at 1B in mid-March of next year the reality is (waiver wire pickup) is really first on the depth chart.  It's trivial to find a better first baseman for free.

The last time Nevin hit for more than a hundred at bats was at high-altitude Lancaster in A ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

And I would just add that keeping Nevin around as a backup first baseman is ludicrous for all the reasons you just mentioned. Once Mancini gets traded, Mountcastle should play everyday, and let's be real, if he gets hurt, anybody can finish out the game. 

I would consider a position move for a corner OF or 3B before I'd go into a season with Nevin as a primary choice at first.

Of course Mountcastle is written into the 2023 lineup card there with permanent ink.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I know people have some kind of love for this guy, but I really don't understand why.

In 329 AAA PAs over and a half season because of constant injuries, Dias has slashed .182/.271/.289/.559.

Since coming back from his latest injury, he's slashed .137/.279/.216/.494 in 61 PAs over 15 games.

Defensively he's probably similar to Santander. He's a below average runner and he still doesn't have a plan at the plate with pitchers after 2025 professional at bats!

So someone please tell me why there is desire to give him a look at the major league level?

Why are they fools for not giving this guy a chance?

 

I do think some of it is irrational, but he has flashed some impressive tools.  I do not think it is unrealistic to want to see how he does if he can stay healthy for a stretch.   Can he do that the rest of this year in AAA sure.  But, If I were making moves to get looks and I did not want to have to put certain people on the 40 man roster, Diaz is a guy I might give a couple of weeks to.  

I dont care that he was the centerpiece of the Machado trade or that the Dodgers spent 30 Million or whatever for him.  But if I don't think he is gonna make it, I might try to get a fire under him if only to pass him off on someone else.  Of course he could also have a rebirth and be a keeper.  Lottery tickets do sometimes pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I would consider a position move for a corner OF or 3B before I'd go into a season with Nevin as a primary choice at first.

Of course Mountcastle is written into the 2023 lineup card there with permanent ink.

Unless he's traded. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm going to disagree. Nevin has slashed .200/.320/.297/.617 in 175 major league PAs which is what you probably expect for a guy who slashed .244/.324/.413/.736 in 559 AAA PAs and .251/.345/.399/.744 in 540 AA PAs. He just can't get to his solid raw power in games and hits way too many ground balls. For corner infielder, he should not be in the major leagues and if he's the option to play first base regularly, Elias has failed.

You have made your decision on Nevin.  I have not.  Could be a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...