Jump to content

FG’s Longenhagen top Os prospect list..Cowser at 12!


dzorange

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure..which goes back to what I’m saying.  Btw, lots of HS #1 picks put up HOF level careers, not just above average.

Well, if by “lots,” you mean 4-7.  ARod, Chipper, Griffey and (cough) Baines are in, Mauer, Harper and Correa have a good shot.  

Chipper essentially spent three full, healthy years in the minors, though he did get a cup of coffee (8 PA) at the end of his third year when the MiL season was over.   ARod was in the majors a year after being drafted, Griffey and Harper two years after, the others in their third year.

Examples of 1:1 guys who took more than three years but turned out well: Adrian Gonzalez and Josh Hamilton.  Obviously, there were a lot of other things going on with Hamilton.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

Loves Ortiz; Hates Westburg.  A 40 arm?

I wouldn’t say that Longenhagen hates Westburg. He’s just more skeptical that he’s an above-average regular because he’s not sure what position he plays and he’s not sure whether he can make enough contact. From watching him, I share those concerns.

In contrast, from his grades, he views Ortiz’ defense and hit tool as plus tools that are more likely to carry him. Ortiz’ contact ability and ability to play plus defense give him a higher floor, which I think is reflected in the ranking. I am biased here because I think Ortiz could be great and think he should probably be starting at second or SS if you want to move on from Mateo.

I know you think that Westburg is a legit middle of the order bat who can play multiple positions. I don’t share that opinion (because I’m concerned about whether he will make enough contact and am not as bullish on his defense) and neither does Longenhagen, but you might be correct, and I could be completely wrong about Ortiz. The great thing is that we will get to find out, and I hope that you are right about Westburg and I am right about Ortiz, and they both help lead us to many winning seasons.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

You have to hand it to Longenhagen, outside of @Tony-OH, he provides the most detailed write ups of the players and gives a strong idea of what he likes and doesn’t like about a prospect.   

As to the Grayson write-up, it’s pretty clear he was relying heavily on how Grayson looked after returning from the lat strain.   I’m not too concerned about that and expect the “real” Grayson to re-emerge this spring.   

He seems more negative on Westburg’s defense than most other evaluators, putting him in the same category as Norby defensively and overall.  I’m reserving judgment on that.  

I got the distinct impression that his write ups on Beaver and Fabian were based on how they’d looked in college.  Beaver in particular has made some swing changes as a pro that weren’t acknowledged in the article.  

Reading the write-ups as a whole, I came away with the impression that there’s a fair number of players with good upside in our system, who he’s rating conservatively until they break out.  Fair enough.  



 

Thanks. As with all evaluators, sometimes we just like a guy more than others. For the most part, I don't have any major issues with what he wrote and he does a thorough job. It's pretty clear he doesn't have access to the information on the Dominican guys that haven't at least played in the FCL, because they would clearly be over some of the generic pitching prospect he has on the last after 20. 

We have similar opinions on almost all of the big names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing underrated on many Oriole prospects is the ability to advance and adapt.  Henderson did it. Stowers did it.   Westburg and Cowser did it.   It’s an important quality and ability to have especially once you reach the big show.  Mayo, for all of his upside, is the one guy who hasn’t shown it, yet.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

One thing underrated on many Oriole prospects is the ability to advance and adapt.  Henderson did it. Stowers did it.   Westburg and Cowser did it.   It’s an important quality and ability to have especially once you reach the big show.  Mayo, for all of his upside, is the one guy who hasn’t shown it, yet.

I think most players that are highly regarded prospects have shown an ability to adapt.  Aside from the rare freak athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think most players that are highly regarded prospects have shown an ability to adapt.  Aside from the rare freak athlete.

I agree but we also see highly regarded prospects in A and low A become lesser prospects as they advance.  Walk rates get lower.  Strikeout rates get higher.  OPS gets lower with each level and they fall down lists.   Most of our top guys have shown improvement or no degradation while advancing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SpOkane said:

Still managed 1.5 oWAR.

Freak show!  One of my favorite players all time (mostly due to his commitment to the mustache).  

 

I was just joking about the seasoning (but nevertheless interesting to see his progression the first 6 years).  Man, I wasted like 30 min on his B-Ref page.  What a career.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

One thing underrated on many Oriole prospects is the ability to advance and adapt.  Henderson did it. Stowers did it.   Westburg and Cowser did it.   It’s an important quality and ability to have especially once you reach the big show.  Mayo, for all of his upside, is the one guy who hasn’t shown it, yet.

Mayo is the one guy I'd bet on flopping.  Just a pure gut feeling.  The tools are unreal, but I just don't see it.  I hope to god I'm wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Mayo is the one guy I'd bet on flopping.  Just a pure gut feeling.  The tools are unreal, but I just don't see it.  I hope to god I'm wrong.  

From Delmarva to Bowie, his walk rate dropped at each level while his strikeout rate rose at each level.  He also looks like a strict pull hitter at this point.  He’s very young and has talent.  I do think this year will tell us if he’s capable of making those adjustments or not.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

From Delmarva to Bowie, his walk rate dropped at each level while his strikeout rate rose at each level.  He also looks like a strict pull hitter at this point.  He’s very young and has talent.  I do think this year will tell us if he’s capable of making those adjustments or not.   

I like guys that can see the ball as long as possible.  That gives them a better chance to identify and hit a pitch.  You can measure that   with “trigger to impact” times.  Guys that are quick to get to their power and can wait as long as possible I believe thrive.  This is seen in natural oppo power.  I’ve seen Mayo swing and miss at a lot of seemingly very hittable pitches.  I’ve been slow to get excited but am hoping he is the next Troy Glaus.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I like guys that can see the ball as long as possible.  That gives them a better chance to identify and hit a pitch.  You can measure that   with “trigger to impact” times.  Guys that are quick to get to their power and can wait as long as possible I believe thrive.  This is seen in natural oppo power.  I’ve seen Mayo swing and miss at a lot of seemingly very hittable pitches.  I’ve been slow to get excited but am hoping he is the next Troy Glaus.  

Right.  Norby was complimented by one of the coaches as a hitter who thinks about taking the fastball to right center which allows him to wait and identify and adjust to other pitch types.   It sounded like a system wide philosophy.  Easier said than done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of a sobering writeup, Longenhagan definitely isnt high on many of our SP prospects, already calling Hall a reliever and Grayson a mid rotation upside. Also suggests Cowser and Kjerstad may be platoon OF's. Also not high on Norby or Westburgs defense. Still, we have strength in numbers so if these guys underperform at least we have some promising prospects behind them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...