Jump to content

Three thoughts on the pitch clock


interloper

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Spakman said:

I also wonder how much advertising plays into this. I don’t know the commercial lengths in each decade or where they started having commercials but I’m assuming it’s a factor.

Do they have "commerical timeouts" in baseball like they do in other sports? If they do I was completely unaware. I just thought the pace of the game was slow enough to squeeze them in, in between innings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2023 at 7:41 PM, Jagwar said:

Could you imagine the complete chaos that would ensue if Aaron Judge gets called out on strikes to end the World Series because he couldn't get ready for a pitch in time? Or Devers? I'd pop pocorn and read the meltdown on SoSH with glee. 

(of course, I'd hate it if it were an Oriole)

I think there’s a high likelihood of some pitch clock shenanigans helping the home team like we see in shot clock, play clock, and game clock.

Maybe the activation method will prevent that? Then again we’ve seen that the laws of physics don’t apply to the foul pole in Yankee stadium during the playoffs so who knows.

On 3/6/2023 at 7:41 PM, Jagwar said:

Could you imagine the complete chaos that would ensue if Aaron Judge gets called out on strikes to end the World Series because he couldn't get ready for a pitch in time? Or Devers? I'd pop pocorn and read the meltdown on SoSH with glee. 

(of course, I'd hate it if it were an Oriole)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Ripken said:

All major sports leagues are concerned that younger people aren't interested in their product.  It's a big part of rule changes favoring offense, embracing the once toxic gambling environment, turning stadiums into entertainment complexes, and so forth.  Far too many people consider baseball boring.  Changes like this are very needed if it's going to thrive.

Football seems to be back and thriving of late, but yes, I do think the younger generation is to in need of instant gratification that a sport like baseball must be tweaked a bit to keep it relevant past us diehards. 

I'm not a gambler really, but clearly, gambling has become a huge part of the younger fans experience, especially in football where same game parlays are very popular. 

Overall, I was against the 2nd base runner in extra innings and any pitch clocks before I saw them in the minors and became a fan of both. sometimes change is actually good for the game.

Now if someone can do something about college football game times! lol

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Football seems to be back and thriving of late, but yes, I do think the younger generation is to in need of instant gratification that a sport like baseball must be tweaked a bit to keep it relevant past us diehards. 

I'm not a gambler really, but clearly, gambling has become a huge part of the younger fans experience, especially in football where same game parlays are very popular. 

Overall, I was against the 2nd base runner in extra innings and any pitch clocks before I saw them in the minors and became a fan of both. sometimes change is actually good for the game.

Now if someone can do something about college football game times! lol

I still don't care for either (I like the runner at second less than the pitch clock). That sad, it's not the point that I'll stop watching. I may adjust how I watch, but they still have my eyes on the game so the changes aren't for me. I imagine most fans that prefer the game without the clock are like me in that they won't stop watching because of the changes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

 

Now if someone can do something about college football game times! lol

The excessive replay reviews, long timeouts for commercials, etc., are really frustrating. Watching a game is getting ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the pitch clock isn't supposed to be visible in real games. But some media outlets have added it to their scorebugs. I think it would probably be better if it were just totally invisible. Hopefully violations would be rare enough that it simply looks like the players are working faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this idea along the lines that "kids need instant gratification" is a total straw man argument.  It is objectively true that baseball games didn't used to take this long.  I'm 40 and I would love for the game times to revert back to when I was a kid.

Count me in the demographic that loves baseball but does not watch interminable postseason games anymore (unless the O's are in them!) because they drag on so much.  The game has changed due to analytics (mostly because of people my age).  I think it's OK to want to return the gametime to what it once was.  I, for one, am excited about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My current theory is I think OBP could be pretty significantly down throughout baseball due to the pitch clock. Guys are just so rushed and up there hacking it seems like. Like I said in the OP, no real idea if that will be true, it's just a theory.

But if it pans out like that, it would be the opposite of what league wants in terms of increasing offense. I think they might just increase pop-ups and ground outs. Will more balls in play = more hits? Maybe, but I think overall there could be less guys on base due to rushed swing decisions. 

With a team like the Orioles who already have several guys with poor OBP, that could be an issue. 

Or it's just a wrong theory! 

image.thumb.png.1c7c8fdcad07da2dfaf7418c7897a3dc.png

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2023 at 12:46 PM, StottyByNature said:

I think this idea along the lines that "kids need instant gratification" is a total straw man argument.  It is objectively true that baseball games didn't used to take this long.  I'm 40 and I would love for the game times to revert back to when I was a kid.

Count me in the demographic that loves baseball but does not watch interminable postseason games anymore (unless the O's are in them!) because they drag on so much.  The game has changed due to analytics (mostly because of people my age).  I think it's OK to want to return the gametime to what it once was.  I, for one, am excited about it.

 

It's not a straw man, but maybe it's not well articulated.

Kids these days (yeah, I said it) have their faces stuck in their phones.  And on top of that, they have the attention span of a gnat.  A slow game like baseball doesn't grab their attention.

The point is that kids have more options than ever for things to grab their attention.  I'm 41, so we're about the same age...you and I didn't have NEARLY the amount of options for entertainment back when we were growing up that kids do today.  As a result, baseball is threatened to get lost in the shuffle behind more action oriented ball sports like football and basketball  and sports that have increased in popularity over the years like lacrosse and soccer, not to mention things like MMA that didn't exist 25 years ago.  And on top of that, every video game console, website, streaming platform, etc.  There's just so many more options for kids in general.  

So when they say "instant gratification" I think it's a bit of a misnomer.  But there is a certain amount of truth to it, too.  Growing up, I couldn't have ever imagined having every song ever at my fingertips for 15 bucks a month.  Couldn't imagine having practically every movie ever at the click of a button.  So yes, these kids do have instant gratification baked into how they're growing up and they don't even know it.  Like, they don't even have to leave the house for anything.  Groceries? Delivered.  Fast food?  Delivered.  At the absolute worst Amazon will deliver it TOMORROW.  

But I digress.  I hope my kid just likes "a" sport.  I'm not even particular for which one, I'd even settle for hockey.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2023 at 12:41 AM, accinfo said:

I understand the main reason they haven't opened earlier is because they couldn't get enough employees to work the stadium since covid.  Like many of the service industry there has been a shortage of labor.  

No, it's because John Angelos will only play slave wages, pocketing the rest of their paychecks himself.  But, only after stealing and eating all of his stadium gameday employees' pets.  The bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Interesting to see the trends so far. All point to a better game IMHO.

Will have to tip our collective hats to Manfred for getting this correct.  

I'm betting that 2:30 game time holds for the regular season, give or take 5 minutes either way.  That said, I still think they should do away with the pitch clock for the 9th and extra innings.  I'm really excited about these changes though, this should be a much better brand of baseball.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Phillies TV broadcast yesterday did the pitch clock perfectly. The clock was organically a part of their scorebug, rather than awkwardly tacked on, and it only popped up when there were 10 seconds left. At 8 seconds, the numbers turned yellow. That's how it should be done. Just like the play clock in football only popping up with however many seconds left.

I hope MASN was paying attention (they weren't). 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...