Jump to content

How many of the Orioles’ ST broadcasts have you watched?


Frobby

How many O’s ST games have you watched?  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. How many O’s ST games have you watched?

    • All or part of more than 3 games
    • All or part of 2-3 games
    • All of part of 1 game
    • None, but I’ll probably watch an upcoming one
    • None, and I probably won’t watch any

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/25/23 at 15:51

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I hadn’t really started the WBC poll with this in mind, but so far it appears that many more OH members tuned into the WBC than have tuned in to O’s spring training games.   Considering the composition of the audience, and the frequent complaints about the paucity of O’s spring training broadcasts, that’s not necessarily the outcome I would have expected.  

A lot of the Oriole broadcasts have been during my workday, while most of the WBC was evenings (and in some cases mornings, I caught parts of some of the games in Asia before going to work).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I live in Richmond, is Mlb tv an option?

I doubt it, without a VPN or something.  I don't live in the MASN area, so the Os games aren't blacked out for me unless they are playing Cleveland, Cincy or Pittsburgh.  But I'd imagine that Richmond VA is considered MASN coverage area.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does following on the MLB app count? If so, I’ve followed almost all of the spring training games so far. Most of the games have been when I’m at work, or doing something else, so I haven’t actually sat down and watched any of the games, but I pretty much always have the app open when I’m at my desk at work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, wildcard said:

It will be on Gameday.  I will probably follow the plays.

That's what I've been doing tonight. Interesting that Grayson had 3 excellent innings (1, 2, & 4), but in between gave up 5 runs in the 3rd inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2023 at 5:15 PM, Frobby said:

I hadn’t really started the WBC poll with this in mind, but so far it appears that many more OH members tuned into the WBC than have tuned in to O’s spring training games.   Considering the composition of the audience, and the frequent complaints about the paucity of O’s spring training broadcasts, that’s not necessarily the outcome I would have expected.  

I've watched both, and there's no question the WBC is more enjoyable.

But even judging the spring training games on their own merits, my hope is to see the prospects play and hear interesting commentary from a Kevin Brown who's chatted with players and coaches. But in reality I see a lot of Josh Lester types in action, with the opposing team's commentators, and even when it's a home broadcast we usually have the C-team behind the mic.

In the end, I don't know that we need a lot of ST broadcasts, especially in a WBC year. This is my first year watching the WBC and it really delivered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have watched almost all of the games that had a broadcast and listened to quite a few others. I have probably done so more this spring than any other spring training. Partially because I have the time right now and partially because I am excited about the season and the prospects that may be impacting the team sooner rather than later. I would say I am impressed with Holliday and looking the part even though I preferred Termarr Johnson at draft time. It has been fun to watch individual players and not the team results since so many of the players in spring won’t be on the opening day roster. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have watched every game that's been on TV, whether by MASN or the other networks.  Currently watching Pittsburgh Sportsnet broadcast.  Have listened to every game but 2, followed the last Grayson Rodriguez game on Gameday which was incredibly tedious, as they didn't note each pitch, only the outcome of each at bat. 

Before I met weams, I used to say I'd never meet anyone who'd put up with the amount of baseball I watch -- he was my perfect match, watched just as much as I did!  But then, you guys knew that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Watching the game against Pittsburgh on mlbtv. The Pirates announcers are terrible. There’s a miked up segment with Santana and it’s very awkward. They don’t know what to ask him

"He's a funny guy, that parrot, isn't he?" "He sure is."

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...