Jump to content

Same story as last year


banks703

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Worth pointing out, as I did somewhere else, that Duvall also torched us in spring training, going 4 for 6 with a double and two homers.  

Exactly! So when a guy is on said heater against you, stop throwing him stuff in the zone. 

 

The ball that he hit off of Bautista was hard and straight at the bottom of the zone... to a historically good low-ball hitter. Felix missed his spot but Duvall also just made a really good swing on a 100mph and obnoxiously straight fastball. He's a good player (he's obviously not going to OPS .1300 for a full season) and was hammering O's pitching all weekend. Don't throw him anything that he can barrel up to hurt you.  

 

In football you can ice a kicker with a timeout. In basketball you can hack someone to disrupt their shooting rhythm. In baseball, when a guy is seeing the ball super well and squaring you up like Duvall was all weekend, all you can really do is throw him pitches that he HAS to chase to make hard contact. My frustration is that the O's seem to NEVER learn to stop throwing to a guy who is on a tear against them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no way of knowing what the thought process is, but I guess my main issue is IF we continue to pitch to a guy like that because we are being defiant or because we have this competitor mindset that we are going to be tough guys and show that we can get (insert guy on a tear) out.  I would much rather them recognize (sooner) that said player is on a roll against us right now and let's just try to get the next guy out.  The law of averages doesn't always work out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you notice other teams doing this? Cedric Mullins was having a great series when he came up with runners on second and third in the sixth inning. He had homered in his previous at bat. Rutschman was, what, 0 for his last 6? Were you surprised they didn't intentionally walk Cedric to face Adley because Cedric was "on a tear"? 

Felix Bautista had just struck out Duvall the previous game. He did it on a splitter that wasn't even very good. Walking Duvall to put the tying run in scoring position would have been deranged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moshagge3 said:

Do you notice other teams doing this? Cedric Mullins was having a great series when he came up with runners on second and third in the sixth inning. He had homered in his previous at bat. Rutschman was, what, 0 for his last 6? Were you surprised they didn't intentionally walk Cedric to face Adley because Cedric was "on a tear"? 

Felix Bautista had just struck out Duvall the previous game. He did it on a splitter that wasn't even very good. Walking Duvall to put the tying run in scoring position would have been deranged.

I definitely understand not walking Duvall there.  But that is mainly because the Red Sox could have sent up 56 year old Tim Naehring and he would have come through.  The Red Sox were winning that game the second McKenna gift wrapped that drop.  In that ballpark, with those fans, against that team.....we were going to pay for that one and we did.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JR Oriole said:

I definitely understand not walking Duvall there.  But that is mainly because the Red Sox could have sent up 56 year old Tim Naehring and he would have come through.  The Red Sox were winning that game the second McKenna gift wrapped that drop.  In that ballpark, with those fans, against that team.....we were going to pay for that one and we did.  

In Thursday's game the Orioles also gifted the Red Sox a fourth out. Bautista overcame that ballpark, those fans, and that team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moshagge3 said:

In Thursday's game the Orioles also gifted the Red Sox a fourth out. Bautista overcame that ballpark, those fans, and that team.

Very good point.  I guess getting away with it twice in a row was not going to happen.  The Mateo error was bad but I have seen ground ball misfires to first lots of times.  The McKenna drop seemed to be another level of awful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moshagge3 said:

Do you notice other teams doing this? Cedric Mullins was having a great series when he came up with runners on second and third in the sixth inning. He had homered in his previous at bat. Rutschman was, what, 0 for his last 6? Were you surprised they didn't intentionally walk Cedric to face Adley because Cedric was "on a tear"? 

Felix Bautista had just struck out Duvall the previous game. He did it on a splitter that wasn't even very good. Walking Duvall to put the tying run in scoring position would have been deranged.

I don't think comparing Cedric's series to Duvall's series is apples to apples and I think the AB that you are referencing for Cedric was in the 7th, not the 6th. Dick Bleier threw Cedric two cutters (they played the matchup - Cedric is a career .252 hitter in L/L matchups, hitting .230 for his career with runners on base). Plus, no disrespect to Triston Casas but he is certainly not Adley Rustchman, who started the season 6-6. Did they throw Ceddy a meatball that he could close his eyes and swing at hard? No, two left on left cutters to a guy who has never hit lefties well. In almost any situation I am probably going to pitch to Cedric over Rutschman. Call me crazy for preferring to throw to the lesser of two evils in that situation. 

 

Do we see other teams pitch around hot hitters? Yes, literally every game. I'll use your mention of Adley as a perfect example. Adley was as hot as you can get starting the season 6-6. Did they change how they pitched to him? I think the answer to that question is pretty clear given that he went 0-9 the rest of the series. No one is suggesting that they walk Duvall in that situation but you keep going back to that as if someone proposed it. All that we are saying is that there is a long history of the O's getting torched by the hot hitter, which has clearly carried over to the early part of this season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Here’s the thing (right now), we have 6 starters (one too many) and not enough good relievers (certainly none who can pitch more than an inning). Kremer has issues (this season) the more times that he does through the lineup (especially the third time through). It seems plausible to me that the switch given Kremer’s stuff would be better for everyone where Kremer may even at a tick in velo and be better at getting strikeouts as a reliever. And Irvin who has been an excellent starter (thus far) could continue in that role.
    • On one hand, it's always a bad thing when a pitcher has to get a 4th out, either because of an error or an umpire's mistake. On the other hand, a pitcher still has to execute and can't serve up a meatball. That being said, that was probably the most impactful non-strike call I can remember this year, maybe a few years.   EDIT: From Melewski - "Sometimes the strike call you don't get leads to the fastball you throw that leaves the ballpark."
    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...