Jump to content

Very, very way too early thoughts


eddie83

Recommended Posts

As long as we have this current ownership group in place it will be a serious uphill battle. The margin of error is razor thin for every other part of the baseball ops to have to be firing on all cylinders and almost be perfect because basically we have no org leadership (that is to say top of the pyramid is terrible).

We may have the worst ownership in all of American pro sports (I guess along with the Washington Commanders). But they at least are up for sale so they might have hope there. Meanwhile we are stuck with the worst! 

Edited by Bemorewins
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way anyone competent with a good, young, cheap, overachieving team would say, "Ay well, just run it back. No need for improvements". Unless winning baseball games and ultimately pennants and championships were not really that much of a priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

As long as we have this current ownership group in place it will be a serious uphill battle. The margin of error is razor thin for every other part of the baseball ops to have to be firing on all cylinders and almost be perfect because basically we have no org leadership (that is to say top of the pyramid is terrible).

We may have the worst ownership in all of American pro sports (I guess along with the Washington Commanders). But they at least are up for sale so they might have hope there. Meanwhile we are stuck with the worst! 

Snyder is a worse owner and it’s not particularly close. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think McKenna's error was representative of his defensive abilities.  I also don't know why he is on the team.

What the hell was Vavra doing in LF and why did he bother to bring a glove anyway?

Can anyone confirm that the Orioles actually do have a player named Kyle Stowers who can play the OF?

 

I think the defense will tighten up quickly enough so I'm not that concerned about what we've seen the last three games even though they've been difficult to watch.  I share everyone else's concerns about the bullpen.  Maybe it's just me, but I think it would be great if Hyde stopped screwing around with the uber flexible lineup approach.

Mountcastle's looked pretty good so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 24fps said:

I don't think McKenna's error was representative of his defensive abilities.  I also don't know why he is on the team.

What the hell was Vavra doing in LF and why did he bother to bring a glove anyway?

Can anyone confirm that the Orioles actually do have a player named Kyle Stowers who can play the OF?

 

I think the defense will tighten up quickly enough so I'm not that concerned about what we've seen the last three games even though they've been difficult to watch.  I share everyone else's concerns about the bullpen.  Maybe it's just me, but I think it would be great if Hyde stopped screwing around with the uber flexible lineup approach.

Mountcastle's looked pretty good so far.

I didn't see the game. What did Vavra do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moshagge3 said:

 

It wasn't a definitive statement or anything, but it's not a good look when you're asked about an extension for your best player and you immediately start talking about the limitations of the "system."

System my rear.  Cheap is in Angelos family DNA.   If you don’t have the dough, then they should be forced to sell to someone that does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...