Jump to content

Wells is a starter 2023


Since1984

Recommended Posts

Tyler Wells has gone through  all the tests needed to be a Starting Pitcher for the 2023 rotation. Lots of concerns with his rule 5 initiation, injuries, etc. 

His injury history is only as much a concern, as any candidate on the annual rotation. Let him start from here on out and the Orioles will be more successful.

This guy can pitch.  SSS, I beg not…he has the stuff, arm angle and just picked up the team tonight! More to come….job Wells done! 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Since1984 said:

His injury history is only as much a concern, as any candidate on the annual rotation. Let him start from here on out and the Orioles will be more successful.

I just had an epiphany while reading this. Jim Palmer said he was disapointed that Hyde didn't let Wells pitch the 9th to finish the game. I think Tyler's injury history might be 1 of the reasons why Hyde chose to bring in the closer. It's better for the team and for Wells if they can keep his pitch count and IP moderated. It's a long season.

But like you said, he's earned his spot. Job Wells done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I just had an epiphany while reading this. Jim Palmer said he was disapointed that Hyde didn't let Wells pitch the 9th to finish the game. I think Tyler's injury history might be 1 of the reasons why Hyde chose to bring in the closer. It's better for the team and for Wells if they can keep his pitch count and IP moderated. It's a long season.

But like you said, he's earned his spot. Job Wells done!

Definitely agree, Wells has IL stints in every season. Hopefully he can build on the 23 GS and 100 IP from last year!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I just had an epiphany while reading this. Jim Palmer said he was disapointed that Hyde didn't let Wells pitch the 9th to finish the game. I think Tyler's injury history might be 1 of the reasons why Hyde chose to bring in the closer. It's better for the team and for Wells if they can keep his pitch count and IP moderated. It's a long season.

But like you said, he's earned his spot. Job Wells done!

47 pitches in 5 innings.  I don’t think it would have stressed him at all to throw one more inning.   I hated the decision, but I’m letting go of the issue.  We won. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I think the assumption has been that Wells will lose his spot when Gray Rod comes back.  I think it will likely be Gibson or Irvin.  Good to see Wells get the best "start" of the 2023 season.

 I don’t think they traded for Irvin for him not to start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

47 pitches in 5 innings.  I don’t think it would have stressed him at all to throw one more inning.   I hated the decision, but I’m letting go of the issue.  We won. 

I think it was good to get Bautista back on the horse in more favorable conditions after he wasn't super sharp in Fenway.  Obviously Saturday's game should have been over but he still gave up the HR to the next batter and he wasn't real sharp on OD.

I would have been fine with Wells staying in but I think that was playing the long game there by Hyde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wells is such a pleasure to watch when he's on. Doesn't get a lot of K's (only 2 last night) but throws strikes and pitches to contact. If there is an efficiency metric (pitches per out made) I would bet he has been our leader the last couple years. I have been in favor of bullpen role to keep him from wearing down but I can certainly buy into him as a starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Wells is such a pleasure to watch when he's on. Doesn't get a lot of K's (only 2 last night) but throws strikes and pitches to contact. If there is an efficiency metric (pitches per out made) I would bet he has been our leader the last couple years. I have been in favor of bullpen role to keep him from wearing down but I can certainly buy into him as a starter. 

I agree with this.  I love how he gets ahead in counts and mixes up his pitches, all of which he commands well.  He can just zoom through games at times.  If he can stay healthy, he’s a huge asset.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I think the assumption has been that Wells will lose his spot when Gray Rod comes back.  I think it will likely be Gibson or Irvin.  Good to see Wells get the best "start" of the 2023 season.

Gibson and Irvin pitched okay all things considered. Right now it's on Kremer to follow up his dud with a nice start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...