Jump to content

Jorge Mateo 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

It’s been an eventful few games for Mateo.

- Four stolen bases in the first two games.

- Made a throwing error on what could have been the 27th out of Game 1, but Bautista bailed him out by striking out the next batter.  

- Got spiked on the hand while stealing 3B in Game 2.  For a few minutes it seemed like his hand was trembling uncontrollably, though he may have been shaking it intentionally to relieve the sting.  

- Dropped a grounder and then threw too high to 1B for an error in game 4, but also made 3-4 nice plays ranging well to the right of 2B.

- Hit a titanic 433-foot homer in game 4.

Overall, he’s at .300/.417/.600 at the plate.   He’s had a couple of bad at bats, but only has struck out twice in 13 PA, while drawing two walks as well.  He’s hit the ball the other way for a couple of hits, too.   I think he’s had a pretty decent approach in the early going.  Hope he keeps it up.



 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was leaning toward giving Urias more starts at 3B with Gunnar at SS, but Mateo has been proving me wrong. If he can sustain .700 OPS along with his speed he could continue to hold down SS until Holliday. He's definitely been a positive story in the earlygoing.

Only question is what to do with Urias as Mateo at SS pushes him off his best position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I was leaning toward giving Urias more starts at 3B with Gunnar at SS, but Mateo has been proving me wrong. If he can sustain .700 OPS along with his speed he could continue to hold down SS until Holliday. He's definitely been a positive story in the earlygoing.

Only question is what to do with Urias as Mateo at SS pushes him off his best position. 

Urias is the odd man out. He can still start 4 times a week between 2B, 3B, and DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Urias is the odd man out. He can still start 4 times a week between 2B, 3B, and DH.

Maybe not if Mateo continues last year's 80 OPS+, but if he can sustain 90 OPS+ that might be enough. It is true, as great as Urias plays 3B, Mateo's defense is more valuable and it's not like Urias is an .850 OPS guy, he is just slightly above average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Mateo was done after getting spiked in the hand. He couldn’t stop the hand from shaking. That was pretty hard to watch. 
 

He’s been having a good season. You get to see him range a little bit more because of the no shifting. I think his stolen bases make pitchers less likely to walk him. So he should see some better pitchers this year. Not every pitchers can throw sliders away. Very fortunate for us. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I was leaning toward giving Urias more starts at 3B with Gunnar at SS, but Mateo has been proving me wrong. If he can sustain .700 OPS along with his speed he could continue to hold down SS until Holliday. He's definitely been a positive story in the earlygoing.

Only question is what to do with Urias as Mateo at SS pushes him off his best position. 

I don’t care if his OPS is .400, his OBP is the only thing that matters. If he gets on base in the .350 range, he is an asset to the team. A walk to him or a single is almost an automatic double(if no one is on second already).  He creates havoc with the pitching. He is the perfect lead off hitter of the 80s and 90s if he can get on base 35% of the time or more. 
I have said it before, but this team is built for the new rules/bases and the moved back LF wall. Bullpen and defense have been the problem so far and both will be better in the near future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sevastras said:

I don’t care if his OPS is .400, his OBP is the only thing that matters. If he gets on base in the .350 range, he is an asset to the team. A walk to him or a single is almost an automatic double(if no one is on second already).  He creates havoc with the pitching. He is the perfect lead off hitter of the 80s and 90s if he can get on base 35% of the time or more. 
I have said it before, but this team is built for the new rules/bases and the moved back LF wall. Bullpen and defense have been the problem so far and both will be better in the near future. 

True, but OBP is a component of OPS and .350 would be a massive stretch for Mateo. .267 last year. Even .300 would be a nice incremental improvement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sevastras said:

If he gets on base in the .350 range

I'm not sure there will be more than 1 or 2 guys that have a .350 OBP this year for the O's, if that. That's probably too high a bar for Mateo. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

That was such an unusual swing. I actually wonder if he should be pulling the ball more if he can pull it that far.

He pulled a high slider.   When he waits ton the ball he recognizes the slider but has trouble pulling the fastball.   That's just fine with me.   Hit the fastball the other way and pull the offspeed stuff that catches a lot of the plate.   When he has that approach he can recognize what type of pitch it is and his plate discipline is much better.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...