Jump to content

Jordan Westburg’s D


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I always felt that people misinterpreted reports that Ortiz and Gunnar were better than Westburg defensively as meaning that Westburg was either only adequate or below average.  He’s pretty solid if you ask me.  It’s just that Ortiz is really outstanding, and Gunnar is really good.  

This was the Fangraphs write up from this off-season:

Even though he’s on the doorstep of the big leagues, Westburg doesn’t have a clear position yet. He’s played all over the infield but his arm is best suited to play second base, maybe even left field eventually. Seemingly similar to other upper-level hitters with bat-first (some would argue bat-only) profiles, Westburg’s handedness slides him behind guys like Jonathan Aranda, Edouard Julien and Michael Busch, while other righty bats like Miguel Vargasand Spencer Steer have superior bat-to-ball skills. There has to be some separation between Westburg and that group of 50s to account for his combination of strikeouts and below-average defense. He’s still pretty likely to poke out 20-25 homers while playing fringy infield defense, a complementary regular who needs a late-inning replacement.

Now, Fangraphs was much lower on Westburg than others due to the evaluation of his defense, but that doesn’t sound like the player we’ve seen this year in the slightest.  That’s a pretty terrible eval and so far he’s looked like a plus defender at 2B. Very happy he’s apparently proven them wrong.

The Orioles’ development has justifiably gotten a lot of attention for their hitting performances by prospects, but maybe we’re overlooking what they are able to do with development defensively as well. Gunnar also looks much better as a SS than what he was billed as IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaptainRedbeard said:

This was the Fangraphs write up from this off-season:

Even though he’s on the doorstep of the big leagues, Westburg doesn’t have a clear position yet. He’s played all over the infield but his arm is best suited to play second base, maybe even left field eventually. Seemingly similar to other upper-level hitters with bat-first (some would argue bat-only) profiles, Westburg’s handedness slides him behind guys like Jonathan Aranda, Edouard Julien and Michael Busch, while other righty bats like Miguel Vargasand Spencer Steer have superior bat-to-ball skills. There has to be some separation between Westburg and that group of 50s to account for his combination of strikeouts and below-average defense. He’s still pretty likely to poke out 20-25 homers while playing fringy infield defense, a complementary regular who needs a late-inning replacement.

Now, Fangraphs was much lower on Westburg than others due to the evaluation of his defense, but that doesn’t sound like the player we’ve seen this year in the slightest.  That’s a pretty terrible eval and so far he’s looked like a plus defender at 2B. Very happy he’s apparently proven them wrong.

The Orioles’ development has justifiably gotten a lot of attention for their hitting performances by prospects, but maybe we’re overlooking what they are able to do with development defensively as well. Gunnar also looks much better as a SS than what he was billed as IMO. 

Fangraphs is overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Westburg's bat is better at every position too.

But is it? Their AAA numbers would not say that. It is so weird to me how the Os have treated them so oppositely. Westburg is brought up with trumpets blaring, hype videos, etc. Ortiz is yo-yo’d back and forth, given 30 sporadic at bats and now deemed the lesser player. I would venture that if you bring Ortiz up and give him equal playing time, thoughts would be different.  
And that isn’t taking anything away from Westburg, who I am extremely impressed with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Westburg's bat is better at every position too.

There is a power tradeoff for sure, but don't discount Ortiz's bat too much. 

AAA stats

Ortiz           .338/.394/.558/.951, 26 BB, 52 Ks in 310 PAs
Westburg   .283/.366/.533/.899, 73 BB, 154 K in 714 PAs

I think too many people are taking Ortiz's small sample size when he was up, in which he got very inconsistent playing time, and put too much emphasis on that. 

Ortiz finally got basic every day PAs from May 14th to 21st and after the first three games where he went hitless, he hit .455/.455/.546/1.000 over his next five games before being sent back to AAA. 

Since going back down to the minors, and despite Westburg and Cowser getting promotions, he's slashed .348/.434/.500/.934 with 7 double and 7-10 BB-K ratio in 11 games over 53 PAs.

Ortiz is going to be an everyday SS for someone and would look darn good as the everyday SS or 2B right now, but because of Frazier and Mateo he's in AAA. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

There is a power tradeoff for sure, but don't discount Ortiz's bat too much. 

AAA stats

Ortiz           .338/.394/.558/.951, 26 BB, 52 Ks in 310 PAs
Westburg   .283/.366/.533/.899, 73 BB, 154 K in 714 PAs

I think too many people are taking Ortiz's small sample size when he was up, in which he got very inconsistent playing time, and put too much emphasis on that. 

Ortiz finally got basic every day PAs from May 14th to 21st and after the first three games where he went hitless, he hit .455/.455/.546/1.000 over his next five games before being sent back to AAA. 

Since going back down to the minors, and despite Westburg and Cowser getting promotions, he's slashed .348/.434/.500/.934 with 7 double and 7-10 BB-K ratio in 11 games over 53 PAs.

Ortiz is going to be an everyday SS for someone and would look darn good as the everyday SS or 2B right now, but because of Frazier and Mateo he's in AAA. 

 

And let’s not forget that Ortiz had some elite exit velos in the minors. 
 

There is no better example of regency bias than Os fans talking Westburg vs Ortiz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And let’s not forget that Ortiz had some elite exit velos in the minors. 
 

There is no better example of regency bias than Os fans talking Westburg vs Ortiz.

There are only a couple of posters who were judging Ortiz off his miniscule sample in the majors (one of whom was banned from the site for unrelated reasons).   Most people know that his lengthy minor league record is more relevant.   

That said, I do think Westburg will prove to be the better hitter.  But I believe z Ortiz will have a decent bat and would love to see him get regular ABs in the majors.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There are only a couple of posters who were judging Ortiz off his miniscule sample in the majors (one of whom was banned from the site for unrelated reasons).   Most people know that his lengthy minor league record is more relevant.   

That said, I do think Westburg will prove to be the better hitter.  But I believe z Ortiz will have a decent bat and would love to see him get regular ABs in the majors.
 

Os fans don’t only exist on this site. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ortiz actually profiles a bit better for OPACY than Westburg IMO. Westburg has a lot of pull power but he’s going to get hurt by the wall a lot more than Ortiz. Ortiz is more contact/line drive oriented and that higher AVG, doubles profile plays better when pulled 400 ft shots are fly outs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I’ll take Westburg at second, Ortiz at SS and Gunnar at third for the rest of the season please.

I'd be excited to see that lineup. Also pretty excited for current lineup of Gunnar SS, Urias 3B, Westburg 2B. With Frazier and Mateo slipping out of the picture, now the question is whether Ortiz is better than Urias, and that is a tougher call. I would not be opposed to Ortiz, but I like Urias and he really hasn't done anything to lose his job. If Elias can trade Urias and improve the team, I would be on board with that. But what if he could trade Ortiz and improve the team even more? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I'd be excited to see that lineup. Also pretty excited for current lineup of Gunnar SS, Urias 3B, Westburg 2B. With Frazier and Mateo slipping out of the picture, now the question is whether Ortiz is better than Urias, and that is a tougher call. I would not be opposed to Ortiz, but I like Urias and he really hasn't done anything to lose his job. If Elias can trade Urias and improve the team, I would be on board with that. But what if he could trade Ortiz and improve the team even more? 

Westburg or Ortiz need to be traded in the next year or so. I’m fine with doing it now but not for a rental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • They are a bunch of simp libtards now, you'd fit in well
    • Trade for trout while his is stock is low. Bit of a gamble, but he's a leader that needs a change of scenery. He is our RF/ DH middle of the order RH bat to replace santander  If we can keep him healthy, he might be the veteran presence we need. We have the salary space for his contract 
    • I'm rooting against the Yankees this weekend. Hasn't gotten close to that point for me. The 2016 WC game was the worst because of the Britton situation. The 2014 Royals series was awful. I don't know that this loss was even as bad as last year's vs the Rangers where it felt like we could go all the way. This was just a wild card team vs a wild card team that could go either way, and some bounces didn't go our way and young players couldn't handle the pressure. It's best-of-3, it happens.
    • I'm older than most here. The pain of being a sports fan in Baltimore in 1969 make this year's playoff sweep seem trivial. All three of our local pro teams had great regular seasons. The Colts were a sure thing to beat the upstart Jets in Super Bowl III. No way the mighty Orioles would lose to the Mets in the World Series. And I thought for sure the Bullets might beat the Knicks in the NBA semifinals. Talk about long lasting pain ...
    • Come on man, that's a crock. I've been as frustrated as anyone watching Adley's approach at the plate and his uppercut swing. But to say he's the kind of guy that makes excuses is way out of line. I have no doubt Adley will work on getting his body, swing and mind right in the off-season. 
    • I was given three free tix to see them in Durham in '23. They oversold the tix, ie. the seats were not assigned, first come / first serve,  the line to get in was ridiculously long, and we had to stand in the miserable heat and humidity of a NC summer.  Worst baseball in person experience of my life. Just goofy from the little I got to see in the three person deep standing room only crowd. We left after three innings or whatever they call it in their version of the game. Way too loud, too. Just too much BS going on. It was like the baseball version of drinking WAY too much gin and fruit punch and the wild colors give you the bed spins. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...