Jump to content

3 World Series in 7 years?


Explosivo

Recommended Posts

Even if the O’s become the consistently elite team it looks like they might be in the 2020s, making and winning the WS is a crapshoot in the modern postseason format. 

The Yankees are on 10 straight postseason appearances without making a WS.

The Dodgers and Braves have each been to the postseason 14x in the 2000s and each only won 1 World Series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Explosivo said:

Certainly seems like the team to do it. And I’m being conservative. Lol. God I love this team. We have so much amazing talent and they are all gelling together. This is special. Best stretch of baseball I think the Orioles will ever see in their organization ever.

This might be the biggest exaggeration ever, or you're a new fan?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MacAdoo said:

Dude, I’m 45. I have vague memories of ‘83. I’ll just take one that I can appreciate at this point. 

44 year old here.  I feel ya.  If I could be at a game clinching WS win at Camden I think I would literally cry tears of unfathomable joy. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Explosivo said:

Certainly seems like the team to do it. And I’m being conservative. Lol. God I love this team. We have so much amazing talent and they are all gelling together. This is special. Best stretch of baseball I think the Orioles will ever see in their organization ever.

i sm very  enthused too, but no team will ever surpass the 1969-1971 Orioles . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Explosivo said:

Certainly seems like the team to do it. And I’m being conservative. Lol. God I love this team. We have so much amazing talent and they are all gelling together. This is special. Best stretch of baseball I think the Orioles will ever see in their organization ever.

 

4 hours ago, Big Al said:

I just want the kind of organization that every year has reasonable expectations to compete for the WS. 
No “windows of opportunity” and no Marlin, win and then blow it up. 

In the 20 years from 1966 to 1985 the O's had exactly one losing season and six WS appearances.  This is the standard the team should aspire to from this point forward IMO.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Spy Fox said:

Even if the O’s become the consistently elite team it looks like they might be in the 2020s, making and winning the WS is a crapshoot in the modern postseason format. 

The Yankees are on 10 straight postseason appearances without making a WS.

The Dodgers and Braves have each been to the postseason 14x in the 2000s and each only won 1 World Series. 

Look at all the one and done teams.  Marins Nationals Diamondbacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yossarian said:

Giants won 3 in 5 years.   Those teams had arguably weaker offensive and defensive players, but they had Bumgardner, Lincecum, Cain, Romo, and Brian Wilson.  The O's don't have arms like that. 

Right? I was being conservative like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Spy Fox said:

Even if the O’s become the consistently elite team it looks like they might be in the 2020s, making and winning the WS is a crapshoot in the modern postseason format. 

The Yankees are on 10 straight postseason appearances without making a WS.

The Dodgers and Braves have each been to the postseason 14x in the 2000s and each only won 1 World Series. 

The Yankees are largely mediocre and part of their 10 season run is due to the 16 times they played the tanking birds.

Your point is fair though.  The WS is kind of a crapshoot.  2014 the Royals were good, but not the best team.  Same arguably with Philly last year.

The Dodgers and Braves are both more interesting studies...and this is the second long stretch of success for Atlanta and they still have very little to show for it.

But make no mistake.  I'll sign up for what the Dodgers and Braves are doing..and by virtue of that, will help drop the Yankees down a peg or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Think of my red arrow as not as much against this post but more of a lifetime achievement award.  😀
    • This might explain the Orioles clear change in approach.  If you see a pitch you like on the first pitch take a big fat rip at it.  League average SLG is .550 and the O's are at .700.  So there's some analytical wisdom behind going up and hacking.
    • I can't find the article right now, but I recall reading a while back that there was some evidence that hitting tons of home runs correlates with beating your pythagorean expectation.  That's one of the reasons why the early-mid 2010s Orioles teams with prime Chris Davis frequently beat our expected win totals.  Since we're at or close to the stabilization rate for a lot of HR/power numbers I don't think the conclusion here is that our style of play is unsustainable.   Also, offense around the league is in the absolute gutter, so the runs we're able to score are pretty meaningful.
    • Then again, a game with all three of them homering would be sweet! (Bonus question: which outcome is more likely?)
    • I appreciate that he’s not flipping coins, and I know he has a reason for what he does, but a lot of the time, his reasoning is objectively bad. And that’s not really a source of debate. Just like Buck had a reason for saving Britton…but it was a really bad reason. any opinion, by definition, is debatable. A individual decision can be objectively good or bad whether or not it actually succeeds. Overall, most of the time we can give him the benefit of the doubt, but there have been lots of glaring bad decisions. I’ve mentioned Ned Yost. Even the folks at Royals review thought he was an idiot, but he had a splendid team that worked really well for a couple seasons.  
    • He's young and has a very boisterous personality. This funk literally started the day he was crowned player of the week. He's trying too hard and pressing to get back to / repeat that performance.  Another learning experience. Hopefully he locks in soon and levels that mentality out. I also think Jackson being sent down has probably made him feel pressured as well. They seemed to be pretty close. The culmination of those things just screams trying too hard to me 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...