Jump to content

One key to Orioles success


brucewayne

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, IPlayGM said:

Good post, and got me thinking. Could the Orioles be the team that swings the pendulum back from the current home run or bust mindset of the league? They are certainly bucking the trend in many ways, and it remains to be seen if other teams will attempt to mimic this model going forward. That would be different for us Os fans!!!

I was wondering and sort of marveling at the same thing.  The number of times our guys got the bat on the ball and have gone opposite field for hits - rbi hits - rally starting hits, especially, this year alone is greater than the total those power teams we had from 2012-2017.  Sure HR's matter, and we are at 139 - nothing to sneeze at, but a run is a run and these guys are doing it with situational hitting and taking what they can get to all fields.  That's really impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, brucewayne said:

Dont we lead the league in bullpen WAR? 

I don’t know, but in my opinion, WAR based stats don’t determine whether a bullpen is “lockdown.”   For me, lockdown means that once the team has the lead, that game is over.   Last year’s pen was pretty much a lockdown pen. The 2012-16 teams had lockdown pens.   This bullpen is not on par with those, Felix’s heroics notwithstanding.  

2012: 75% save rate

2013: 68%

2014: 75%

2015: 74%

2016: 79%

2022: 78%

2023: 61%

People absolutely murdered Jim Johnson in 2013 for blowing 8 saves in 58 chances (86.2% save rate).   Felix, great as he’s been, has a lower save rate this year (84.2%) than JJ did in 2013.   And JJ had a better supporting cast.   

(I don’t want to digress too far.  I’m not saying 2013 JJ > 2023 FB overall.  But I do think the 2013 bullpen as a whole was more reliable than this one.  And, I always felt that JJ, who had a ridiculous workload in 2012-13, took way too much heat for his 8 blown saves in 2013.)

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brucewayne said:

Do you think we can afford Freddie Freeman, Mookie Betts, Aaron Judge, etc. 

Well yes they can(every team can) but that’s not really relevant to the point.

They aren’t placing anymore emphasis on most of these things than most teams are.

As an organization, they place more value in the draft on position players vs pitchers and that differs from other teams but that’s about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well yes they can(every team can) but that’s not really relevant to the point.

They aren’t placing anymore emphasis on most of these things than most teams are.

As an organization, they place more value in the draft on position players vs pitchers and that differs from other teams but that’s about it.

 

Why did the sign Frazier? Why did they take Kjerstad? Or Rutschman over Witt? Or Holliday over Jones? There is without doubt emphasis on hitting the baseball over tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brucewayne said:

 

Why did the sign Frazier? Why did they take Kjerstad? Or Rutschman over Witt? Or Holliday over Jones? There is without doubt emphasis on hitting the baseball over tools.

Well if the emphasis was on hitting the baseball, they would have taken Martin over Kjerstad since Martin was supposed to have a great hit tool.

You said they prioritize hitting the ball over other teams yet the facts say other teams hit the ball much better than the Os.

The Os are 12th in xBA. They are 8th in exit velo, 10th in hard hit% and 17th in barrel%. You know what team is basically #1 in all of those categories?  The Braves.  So, by definition, they are valuing hitting the ball more than anyone.

The Orioles are doing what a lot of teams are doing and their way of doing things will improve as guys get more experience and more talent comes up.

But they aren’t reinventing the wheel here and any amount of research will show that. You saw something from Kenny, you are running with it and there are no facts to back you up. You are just throwing out cliches and conjecture.

Do some research and compare it to other teams before you go all Bull Durham on us but you should do it quick because I’m guessing your time is running out on this site…again..before you try again…again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well if the emphasis was on hitting the baseball, they would have taken Martin over Kjerstad since Martin was supposed to have a great hit tool.

You said they prioritize hitting the ball over other teams yet the facts say other teams hit the ball much better than the Os.

The Os are 12th in xBA. They are 8th in exit velo, 10th in hard hit% and 17th in barrel%. You know what team is basically #1 in all of those categories?  The Braves.  So, by definition, they are valuing hitting the ball more than anyone.

The Orioles are doing what a lot of teams are doing and their way of doing things will improve as guys get more experience and more talent comes up.

But they aren’t reinventing the wheel here and any amount of research will show that. You saw something from Kenny, you are running with it and there are no facts to back you up. You are just throwing out cliches and conjecture.

Do some research and compare it to other teams before you go all Bull Durham on us but you should do it quick because I’m guessing your time is running out on this site…again..before you try again…again.

Snarky post. Who peed in your coffee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t drink coffee.

And pointing out facts isn’t snarky.  If you want to put stuff out there, you have to be prepared to defend it with actual facts. You can’t do that. 

It's an internet forum man. It's not that serious. You don't have to go for the jugular and post about snarky response like a teenage girl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, brucewayne said:

It's an internet forum man. It's not that serious. You don't have to go for the jugular and post about snarky response like a teenage girl. 

And you don’t have to keep coming back after being banned time after time but yet, here you are.

That said, if you put stuff out there, be prepared to back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interesting thing about the O's, really the unique thing is, our won/lost record has absolutely destroyed statistical analysis.  The stats say we'd be decent but we're the league's best.  

Our best stat is winning 1 run games.  So how do we win those games.  There is no stat to support that.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...