Jump to content

Other Teams Playoffs Thread


Uli2001

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, baltfan said:

It suggests that there isn't sufficient advantage of winning your division.  

Sometimes teams either outperform or underperform. Case in point (and I know I'm going back decades), were the 1969 Mets a better team than the 1969 O's? Absolutely not, but they played a great series, and sometimes the better teams lose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jagwar said:

Sometimes teams either outperform or underperform. Case in point (and I know I'm going back decades), were the 1969 Mets a better team than the 1969 O's? Absolutely not, but they played a great series, and sometimes the better teams lose. 

Three 100 win teams might get one win between them.  Odds are probably pretty low that it’s a product of randomness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Brewers, Dodgers and Orioles had the three best post-All Star Break team ERAs -- yet they all got hit hard in the playoffs. 

And of the three teams only the Orioles had a game where their offense scored more than 3 runs.  The Rays and Blue Jays each only scored 1 run over 2 games.  

Don't know if you can blame the playoff format, but I hated the extended format as soon as it was announced.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

100 wins doesn't get you what it used to do.  Down goes Atlanta.

You're not alone, O's fans.   We'll be back in '24.

I have to say, I feel much better about our loss knowing that all four 99+ win teams lost.  I’ll definitely be rooting for Texas and Arizona in the next round.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick Castellanos in post game interview on how they beat the Braves..."what I am realizing is that the post season is completely different from the regular season" (or words to that effect).

It kind of seems like it.

Edited by FlaO'sFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I have to say, I feel much better about our loss knowing that all four 99+ win teams lost.  I’ll definitely be rooting for Texas and Arizona in the next round.  

Texas against Arizona sounds like a bowl game not the World Series, but it is a bit hard not to pull for those two teams.  My mid-Atlantic loyalties kind of have me pulling for Philly, and I like their home stadium atmosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TonySoprano said:

100 wins doesn't get you what it used to do.  Down goes Atlanta.

You're not alone, O's fans.   We'll be back in '24.

As scary as Atlanta was their surprising Achilles heel the second half of the season was their pitching.  It just wasn't very good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

Texas against Arizona sounds like a bowl game not the World Series, but it is a bit hard not to pull for those two teams.  My mid-Atlantic loyalties kind of have me pulling for Philly, and I like their home stadium atmosphere.

I dislike Harper.  Always have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harper's career has I think given us The Truman Show kind of experience watching a ridiculously talented child become a more mature adult.

He has the "6th best team in the league" access to thank for helping get it started, but a Hall of Fame talent at his peak chasing that dogpile is baseball excellence to savor.

The Braves beat the Phillies by 14, but since Bryce's OPS bottomed out at .764 on June 29th, ATL was only 3 games better.     Loosely I'd give Harper a mulligan on May-June results as if he wasn't him, he wouldn't have been allowed to play so quickly after a TJ procedure.

Last night was one of my first times getting to watch a whole Strider game, and it didn't hit me like he's as near to the Best Pitcher as his overall numbers make it look like.

I have a feeling both LCS's will be stomps and we'll get a HOU-PHI rematch.     Recency bias of course I'm salty getting smacked by TEX, and am skeptical if they'll hold up against the AL's entrenched champions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...