Jump to content

Bloomberg: Carlyle Group/David Rubenstein In Talks To Purchase Orioles


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

The payroll is increasing.  That's just a fact.  People are always going to want it to go higher, but as long it doesn't get in the way of winning, I don't care.   Payroll is not the most important thing about winning.

Elias has done a phenomenal job drafting and developing a strong organization. Locking up the superstars of the rebuild and augmenting the team with a few critical outside pieces could take them from a regular contender to a legitimate, consistent WS favorite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MTMan13 said:

That's not how modern sports ownership conglomerates work. The groups that bought the Lakers, Broncos, WFT, etc all had a roster of shareholders who put up a percentage behind a frontman / lead capital provider. It's much more corporate, and correspondingly has less key-man risk. 

As an aside, how can anyone nitpick over the Orioles being sold? Satan might be a better owner than Pete. 

But when he dies, and his family wants to liquidate his controlling share, they're going to have to sell and we'll have a new controlling owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like this dude for a number of reasons, and yes, I've heard of him before a week ago.

But I will say this: How these billionaires make their money can you tell a lot about how they're going to run their organizations.

Peter Angelos made his money as a trial lawyer and he ran his baseball team as one.  It was disastrous on a numbrer of levels.

Steve Bisciotti made his money in personnel, and he's ran his football team as such.  And it's been very successful.

Rubenstein is a lawyer and investment capitalist, who seems to have made his money largely because of a lot of friendly relationships with people inside the Beltway.

That doesn't inspire me with confidence.

Edited by Pickles
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

But when he dies, and his family wants to liquidate his controlling share, they're going to have to sell and we'll have a new controlling owner.

Sure, but you have significantly less "lame duck" risk where the group is not acting in the best interests of the team because of a power void.

While David's net worth is significant, $4bn would seem to not be enough for him to be a >50% shareholder of the team. Suspect we're a >$2bn price tag based on the Mets revenue multiple (and 2023 Revenue was undoubtedly much higher than the 2022 number I'm using). No idea how much debt is allowable in these deals (the NFL has limits), but presumably the required equity check is >$1bn. Seriously doubt a $4bn net worth family would allocate more than $400-500MM to own a professional sports team. So hopefully he's got a big group of rich Baltimore fans who each own 5-10%. Would be cool to see Biscotti take a piece and have a pre-wired succession plan to be the majority owner of the team once David needs to step down. 

Who knows though, he's probably a competing bidder!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MTMan13 said:

Sure, but you have significantly less "lame duck" risk where the group is not acting in the best interests of the team because of a power void.

While David's net worth is significant, $4bn would seem to not be enough for him to be a >50% shareholder of the team. Suspect we're a >$2bn price tag based on the Mets revenue multiple (and 2023 Revenue was undoubtedly much higher than the 2022 number I'm using). No idea how much debt is allowable in these deals (the NFL has limits), but presumably the required equity check is >$1bn. Seriously doubt a $4bn net worth family would allocate more than $400-500MM to own a professional sports team. So hopefully he's got a big group of rich Baltimore fans who each own 5-10%. Would be cool to see Biscotti take a piece and have a pre-wired succession plan to be the majority owner of the team once David needs to step down. 

Who knows though, he's probably a competing bidder!  

Bisciotti once described minority ownership as gifting an interest free loan in exchange for a box seat.  I don't know how many Baltimoreans want to hand over 10s of millions of dollars to be a glorified season ticket holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

Bisciotti once described minority ownership as gifting an interest free loan in exchange for a box seat.  I don't know how many Baltimoreans want to hand over 10s of millions of dollars to be a glorified season ticket holder.

That's really funny - I never saw that quote, but there is some truth to that statement. The valuations are also absurd. You're only buying a sports team today out of love for the team, vanity, access, or to park capital in a largely risk insulated security. There are no real "bargain buys" to be had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a Smalltimore where did you go to high school kind of thing, but as a fellow City alum, Rubenstein as possible principal owner gives a good feeling.

The high school is basically across the street from the old Memorial Stadium site.     He probably would have been in 11th grade give or take when the '66 Orioles were finishing off the Dodgers.      Some people can form lifelong attachments to the teams they grew up with.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MTMan13 said:

That's really funny - I never saw that quote, but there is some truth to that statement. The valuations are also absurd. You're only buying a sports team today out of love for the team, vanity, access, or to park capital in a largely risk insulated security. There are no real "bargain buys" to be had. 

Don't forget, he initially came into the Ravens org as a minority owner.  He only did that with the OPTION to buy, because as he said, minority ownership is a terrible deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I don't like this dude for a number of reasons, and yes, I've heard of him before a week ago.

But I will say this: How these billionaires make their money can you tell a lot about how they're going to run their organizations.

Peter Angelos made his money as a trial lawyer and he ran his baseball team as one.  It was disastrous on a numbrer of levels.

Peter Bisciotti made his money in personnel, and he's ran his football team as such.  And it's been very successful.

Rubenstein is a lawyer and investment capitalist, who seems to have made his money largely because of a lot of friendly relationships with people inside the Beltway.

That doesn't inspire me with confidence.

Who is Peter Bisciotti?  Is he Steve’s evil twin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...