Jump to content

Holliday called up!


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, interloper said:

I agree it's kind of bizarre. This is the kind of thing I don't like about Cal being part owner. But I guess I'm kind of glad it's unofficially-unofficially unretired now.

What does Cal Ripken being part owner have to do with anything?

 

Cal Sr spent 36 years with the Orioles. The team wore a #7 patch on their sleeves when he passed. Regardless of how his managing career went, he was a lot of what the Orioles represented during his lifetime. I don't have any proof, but most owners would have retired a number like that. I'm glad Jackson is wearing it, and so is the Ripken family.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

I've got a nephew named Seven. 

What’s your name?  “Seven”.   No, but what’s your name. “Seven”.   Ok, little boy, it’s not important.  Have fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

If the 2B calls for it and the CF isn’t sure he can get to the ball (maybe, maybe not) what should the CF do?   

I think in that stadium in that situation that’s a mental rep the CF had to take before the play and make sure he goes all out and gives himself a shot.  I thought RF had a better chance at a play on that one.  Tough play for sure, but most difficult to make for the 2B.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I think in that stadium in that situation that’s a mental rep the CF had to take before the play and make sure he goes all out and gives himself a shot.  I thought RF had a better chance at a play on that one.  Tough play for sure, but most difficult to make for the 2B.  

But if the infielder calls for it, and the outfielder isn't sure he can get there, the outfielder is going to pull up and not call off the infielder,  right?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

But if the infielder calls for it, and the outfielder isn't sure he can get there, the outfielder is going to pull up and not call off the infielder,  right?

 

Sure, but doesn't the CF supersede any IF in that situation? I'm honestly not sure, but I thought so. Mullins probably believed Holliday could get it, but I'd like him to say "hell no" in that situation and just take the lead as CF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Sure, but doesn't the CF supersede any IF in that situation? I'm honestly not sure, but I thought so. Mullins probably believed Holliday could get it, but I'd like him to say "hell no" in that situation and just take the lead as CF. 

If Mullins can easily get to the ball he should take charge.  I don't think Mullins easily gets there.  I'm not sure he gets there at all.  My take is that Mullins was running about 80%.  Once he saw Holliday waive him off he cut it down to 50%.   When the ball dropped Mullins was a good 10-15 feet away.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

How long do you all think it will take for Holliday to claim the leadoff spot? Jackson, Adley, Gunnar should be a brutal first inning for opposing teams at some point. 

First, I want him to claim the #9 spot.  When he's hitting so good, moving him to #1 is a no brainer.   Hopefully,  by the end of May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

But if the infielder calls for it, and the outfielder isn't sure he can get there, the outfielder is going to pull up and not call off the infielder,  right?

 

I think it was a mental mistake on the OFers part to be in that situation.  And OF always has priority regardless if the 2B calls him off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he will be down toward the bottom of the order for awhile.  Jeter batted ninth for quite a long time when he started his career to keep the pressure off. This lineup is pretty solid top to bottom. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

But if the infielder calls for it, and the outfielder isn't sure he can get there, the outfielder is going to pull up and not call off the infielder,  right?

 

I’ve now watched this play numerous times, and timed it and dug into some other details.   The ball went 226 feet and had a hang time of 5.2-5.5 seconds (my efforts to time it were inconsistent but all in that range).  I don’t know Mullins’ initial position, but Statcast says his average depth is 322 feet and the various Boston CF’s are between 321-327, so I’m guessing somewhere in that range.  So, 95-101 feet to cover in 5.2-5.5 seconds, without considering that the ball was in RCF, not straightCF.   That’s at least a 3-star catch, possibly a 5 depending on exact time and distance.  So, I’m not going to fault Mullins for not calling off Holliday, who had more like 76 feet to travel, though not in an easy direction.   Bottom line, it was a tough play for anyone and I don’t consider it egregious that it fell in, even though it had an xBA of .040.   

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I think it was a mental mistake on the OFers part to be in that situation.  And OF always has priority regardless if the 2B calls him off.  

I give up. You still didn’t answer the actual question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’ve now watched this play numerous times, and timed it and dug into some other details.   The ball went 226 feet and had a hang time of 5.2-5.5 seconds (my efforts to time it were inconsistent but all in that range).  I don’t know Mullins’ initial position, but Statcast says his average depth is 322 feet and the various Boston CF’s are between 321-327, so I’m guessing somewhere in that range.  So, 95-101 feet to cover in 5.2-5.5 seconds, without considering that the ball was in RCF, not straightCF.   That’s at least a 3-star catch, possibly a 5 depending on exact time and distance.  So, I’m not going to fault Mullins for not calling off Holliday, who had more like 76 feet to travel, though not in an easy direction.   Bottom line, it was a tough play for anyone and I don’t consider it egregious that it fell in, even though it had an xBA of .040.   

Can we agree that Mullins was never in a position to “take charge” and call Holliday off, ESPECIALLY when he saw Holliday call for it like he had it under control?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No I’ve haven’t seen Westburg play 2nd base . I think Westburg plays better at 3rd base but just my opinion .  I’m with you that Mayo should be up now , but we just disagree on what position Mayo should play . Either way let’s hope we see him play soon 
    • Tonight we had a situation where Hays led off the second inning with a double, and Mateo then followed up by swinging at the first pitch and grounding out to 3rd base. It did not appear that Mateo was even trying to hit to the right side to advance the runner, and Hays wound up stranded at 2nd base. It was a little thing, a fundamental thing, on a night where we got shut out.  Obviously we don't know what gets said or unsaid in the dugout or clubhouse, but I was really hoping that when we took the field in the top of the 3rd Mateo would have been benched as a lesson to everybody else on the team. I know in the past other managers have done this in similar situations, and I wish Hyde had done it here. 
    • My understanding is that Norby made a conscious decision to sacrifice some contact for power this year. It has worked out for him. His ISO is up (.233 this year versus .193 last year) and his wRC+ is up (132 this year versus 109 last year). I’ll be down in Norfolk again soon, but he looked fine in the outfield when I saw him earlier this season. I honestly hope he isn’t there when I arrive because he is playing in the majors here or elsewhere (preferably here). Personally, I would like to see both Norby and Mayo on the team because I think they are both talented hitters and I think the defense for both is better than the reputations that they seem to have developed. I hope that they don’t trade Mayo because I think the bat is special. If they trade Norby, that’s fine, but I think he’d be a more than adequate Hays replacement next season.
    • Ever seen Westburg play second base? He's pretty damned good there and a big upgrade from Mateo. You seem to think the only way to get Mayo on the team is at 1B, that's just wrong.
    • Don’t we have a 3rd baseman named Westburg  ?  Haven’t heard any questions about his defense and his batting.281 . If it’s not broken , why fix it ?
    • I would rather he play 3B yes. Ever seen Gunnar Henderson try and throw a ball to first? You need someone there who can make great scoops and catches.
    • Would you rather he play 3rd base instead ?   Which position is more important defensively ?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...