Jump to content

From DFA’d to producing like one of MLB’s best hitters: Ryan O’Hearn has found his groove in Baltimore


LA2

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, interloper said:

Mayo's only use to the big league club right now would be against LHP, where we are kind of struggling (disregarding Mateo and McKenna's outlier home runs for now). 

So if we wanted to have Mayo in a strict platoon against LHP, here's a potential lineup:

Henderson - SS
Adley - C
Mountcastle - 1B
Santander - RF
Westburg - 3B
Mayo - DH
Hays - LF
Mullins - CF
Mateo - 2B
 

Why? He's had an OPS over 1.000 in the last two years against RHP. He's not a platoon bat. Not even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Malike said:

Why? He's had an OPS over 1.000 in the last two years against RHP. He's not a platoon bat. Not even close.

I'm not really saying I'm in favor of it, I'm just saying that might be the only way he regularly gets into this lineup. I guess I just don't buy that the Orioles would actually start him every day at 3B. It's more about that than it is about his R/L splits. There's just more lineup room against LHP. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

I'm not really saying I'm in favor of it, I'm just saying that might be the only way he regularly gets into this lineup. I guess I just don't buy that the Orioles would actually start him every day at 3B. 

I don't think they are bringing him up until he can play just about every day. His bat is his carrying tool and he's definitely not showing he's a platoon guy. I'd think he'll probably be up either in Sept. or be on the team next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, LA2 said:

Analysis of the MLB-leading near-.500 xwOBA of Turn-Burn-O'Hearn*:

https://www.mlb.com/news/ryan-o-hearn-is-one-of-best-hitters-in-2024?game_pk=747044

*Epithet from Ben McDonald

So, O'Hearn is a great story, and I'm glad he's an Oriole, and I don't want to talk at all badly about him. But... the headline here is silly. And the article kind of glosses over a few things to make the headline look less silly if you don't peek behind the curtain.

Yes, if you look at xwOBA O'Hearn has great numbers in a tiny sampling of 2024 data. But you have to consider that he's being platooned so strictly that I have to glance at the dugout to see if Earl's come back from the dead. He's 0-for-5 against lefties. Because of this he doesn't have 3.1 PA/G, so he really doesn't even qualify for the batting title or other rate-stat leader boards. Like, presumably, xwOBA.

Most of the players he's being compared to in any xwOBA leaderboards have the disadvantage of facing at least a some same-sided pitchers. Example... he's tied in OPS+ with Colton Cowser. But Cowser has an OPS vs RHP 100 points higher than O'Hearn, dragged down overall by a more pedestrian showing in 28 PAs vs. lefties.

I'm glad O'Hearn is currently 18th in the majors in OPS+, good for him and the O's. But it doesn't need to be faked into more than it is.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Most of the players he's being compared to in any xwOBAleaderboards have the disadvantage of facing at least a some same-sided pitchers.

Of this the article speaks, in a section subtitled "A Limited Role":

Quote

The caveat to O'Hearn's production is that the Orioles have employed him in a very strict platoon role against right-handed pitching.

Dating back to 2023, only 34 of O'Hearn's 447 plate appearances have come against left-handed pitching -- including just five against lefties in 79 plate appearances this year. Whereas O'Hearn has faced lefties in 7.6 percent of plate appearances dating back to last year, others like Ohtani, Alvarez and Soto are in the lineup every day, regardless of pitcher handedness.

That's not to diminish O'Hearn's development and production as a hitter. Most pitchers, after all, are right-handed so there are ample opportunities for O'Hearn to be in the lineup. It just means his overall numbers might be skewed when comparing him to the Ohtanis and Sotos of the world. It also means the Orioles can't rely on him as an everyday bat (luckily, that's not much of an issue for a stacked Orioles lineup).

The title of the piece is overblown, but that's the nature of trying to catch eyeballs in the mass media.

In fact, the main benefit of the article for me was its analysis of O'Hearn's success--wch had previously been a complete mystery to me--as being due to his efforts to adjust launch angle and becoming very restrained in his swing decisions. If it weren't for such adjustments, including possibly other ones not discussed or understood yet, then he would not be a story at all.

Before coming to the Orioles, O'Hearn's OPS's vs. RHP during his previous four seasons were .678, .577, .673, and .622 (after a 1.019 in 129 rookie PAs in 2018--10 homers, 10 doubles, 16 walks!). So something else happened besides limiting his ABs to facing RHP; it's to the Orioles' great credit that they saw the potential and to O'Hearn's that he executed it.

Edited by LA2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...