Jump to content

I don't expect much from John Means tonight.


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mrbig1 said:

I think he should work in the bullpen for a while. until he's 100%.

It probably easier to start him.  He struggles and gives you 3 innings you have Suarez can give you 5-6.  If you start Suarez how many innings do let him go before Means comes in.  Then if Means comes in and struggles you have to bring in another guy.  It is all about getting him some innings but having a true long man ready if need be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

If he get thru 5 innings I'll be more than happy, especially if he doesn't give up more than 3 runs.  4 innings is more likely.

Yeah 4 innings 3 or less runs is a success imo.  Then let Suarez pitch us to 8th or 9th.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

It probably easier to start him.  He struggles and gives you 3 innings you have Suarez can give you 5-6.  If you start Suarez how many innings do let him go before Means comes in.  Then if Means comes in and struggles you have to bring in another guy.  It is all about getting him some innings but having a true long man ready if need be.  

I hope that Hyde doesn't think Suarez is a reliever now, he can only throw 2 innings max.  Even though he has been throwing 5-6 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think I could watch the games at all if I worried like Roy does. To each his own I guess. I’m just enjoying the ride, the twists and turns. And I’m happy to see Means rejoin the team. You could argue that no single recent player deserves to be a part of the winning version of this organization more than John Means. Mullins and Hays and Santa are with him, but they’ve been here the whole time. 

Came up huge for us in Cleveland late last year. I think he’s going to pitch well, and I think by the end of the year he’s being to be a Montgomery-esque bulldog in our rotation heading into the playoffs.   Imagine Peak Means as our third or even fourth guy in a playoff series. That would really be something. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

I don’t think I could watch the games at all if I worried like Roy does. To each his own I guess. I’m just enjoying the ride, the twists and turns. And I’m happy to see Means rejoin the team. You could argue that no single recent player deserves to be a part of the winning version of this organization more than John Means. Mullins and Hays and Santa are with him, but they’ve been here the whole time. 

Came up huge for us in Cleveland late last year. I think he’s going to pitch well, and I think by the end of the year he’s being to be a Montgomery-esque bulldog in our rotation heading into the playoffs.   Imagine Peak Means as our third or even fourth guy in a playoff series. That would really be something. 

 

17 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

I don’t think I could watch the games at all if I worried like Roy does. To each his own I guess. I’m just enjoying the ride, the twists and turns. And I’m happy to see Means rejoin the team. You could argue that no single recent player deserves to be a part of the winning version of this organization more than John Means. Mullins and Hays and Santa are with him, but they’ve been here the whole time. 

Came up huge for us in Cleveland late last year. I think he’s going to pitch well, and I think by the end of the year he’s being to be a Montgomery-esque bulldog in our rotation heading into the playoffs.   Imagine Peak Means as our third or even fourth guy in a playoff series. That would really be something. 

I enjoy every second when we do well...and we're doing well...but "worry" is part of my passion for my Orioles.I lived through 1969 when the Orioles were up 1-0 in their series with the Mets...then lost it all...in 71 and 79 we lost leads to the Pirates...I am never completely at peace until the game is over and we win...and then...I am ecstatic..it's my innocent obsession. I'm not a dour or angry person...just someone who loves this team madly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Imagine if Bradish and Means BOTH pitch well consistently....then we have Burnes, Bradish, Kremer, GRod(when healthy), Irvin, Means, and my God...maybe even Povich and McDermott....I can dream cant I? You NEVER have enough good pitching..

Edited by Roy Firestone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fiver6565 said:

I don’t think I could watch the games at all if I worried like Roy does. To each his own I guess. I’m just enjoying the ride, the twists and turns. And I’m happy to see Means rejoin the team. You could argue that no single recent player deserves to be a part of the winning version of this organization more than John Means. Mullins and Hays and Santa are with him, but they’ve been here the whole time. 

Came up huge for us in Cleveland late last year. I think he’s going to pitch well, and I think by the end of the year he’s being to be a Montgomery-esque bulldog in our rotation heading into the playoffs.   Imagine Peak Means as our third or even fourth guy in a playoff series. That would really be something. 

I don’t know how half the people on here watch the games or follow the team between the worrying and negative Nancy’s.  We give up a run early the game is over or as soon as the lineup comes out declaring we just punting this game.  I have learned with baseball more than most sports you never know what will happen.  Your 26th man on the roster might get the huge hit to win the game.  In basketball your 10-13th man on the roster might get a few minutes in garbage time but never really change a game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The stuff looks vintage. Normal Means velo. Spotting the change and mixing it in very effectively. Decent hook. Looking like the mid rotation arm he’s historically been for us…. When healthy 🙏

Edited by Grt 2BA FL Gator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

Imagine if Bradish and Means BOTH pitch well consistently....then we have Burnes, Bradish, Kremer, GRod(when healthy), Irvin, Means, and my God...maybe even Povich and McDermott....I can dream cant I? You NEVER have enough good pitching..

And if all goes well, maybe you'll think they can be a .500 team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...