Jump to content

Are we actually 27-14 with the highest runs/game in the AL?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

It's human nature.  Nobody takes the time to fire off messages about what they're happy about.

I'm as guilty of it as anybody.  I virtually never respond to a post that I agree with.  I only respond when I disagree, and the more I disagree, the more likely I am to respond.

Thats how I am too. Occasionally I'll react in a celebratory way in a post, but its often to react analytically.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jabba72 said:

Thats how I am too. Occasionally I'll react in a celebratory way in a post, but its often to react analytically.

I bet people are a lot more pleasant in real life than the online versions of them we interact with.

Except Sports Guy.  I think his online personality far exceeds his actual one.  :)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Board just needs a firm win, really, with some beefy offensive innings. It's been a frustrating stretch with some uncomfortable wins and frustrating losses. 

We could win 11-1 tonight, and there'd be 3 pages complaining about the lineup tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Board just needs a firm win, really, with some beefy offensive innings. It's been a frustrating stretch with some uncomfortable wins and frustrating losses. 

The team has gone a very uncomfortable 10-4 in their last 14 games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Board just needs a firm win, really, with some beefy offensive innings. It's been a frustrating stretch with some uncomfortable wins and frustrating losses. 

Speak for yourself. I'm fine, we won, had our struggles, it's a new day. Firm and beefy, btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pickles said:

It's human nature.  Nobody takes the time to fire off messages about what they're happy about.

I'm as guilty of it as anybody.  I virtually never respond to a post that I agree with.  I only respond when I disagree, and the more I disagree, the more likely I am to respond.

I guess I get that. But I don't understand the people who treat social media and messageboards like I mumble or yell at the TV. A sharp grounder goes through somebody's legs and I'll say "what the @$(%!". They'll take the time to type out 3-4 sentences about how the fielder is of questionable parentage and the GM is clearly smoking crack, and the mananger who put him there must have brain damage.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

The team has gone a very uncomfortable 10-4 in their last 14 games.  

You joke (I assume), but it's kind of true! There really haven't been any "sit back and enjoy an easy win" games recently that I can remember. Maybe 1 during that stretch?

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Got to love it, show you evidence and you still want to deflect.

Starting to have a discussion about something is not the same as asking for change.  Ordinarily discussion happens first.

 

OK, how about this scenario?

What if it comes out that the organizational philosophy is to put emphasis on making the playoffs as often as possible over sacrificing future competitiveness to increase the chances of a title in a one season scenario?

If that is the ownership goal than the moves made at the deadline are right line with that. 

Stuff like that is why discussion is an important step.

 

What are you talking about?  How am I deflecting? This argument is ridiculous. Questioning a GMs ability and discussing replacing him should be done in the same breath. You don’t keep a GM around if you don’t think he can win a World Series for you. My point is just that discussing replacing him or questioning his ability after two playoff appearances is stupid. I wonder if someone can find how many times GMs or managers have made two failed playoff appearances before finally winning a world series. I bet there’s a few.
 

Anyway, I just want to talk about baseball. If all you have to defend your comment is this dumb semantics argument, then I think we are done here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Pickles said:

It's human nature.  Nobody takes the time to fire off messages about what they're happy about.

I'm as guilty of it as anybody.  I virtually never respond to a post that I agree with.  I only respond when I disagree, and the more I disagree, the more likely I am to respond.

a62f6918-a5c9-4fe5-87fc-3d3eb4a6151d_tex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I guess I get that. But I don't understand the people who treat social media and messageboards like I mumble or yell at the TV. A sharp grounder goes through somebody's legs and I'll say "what the @$(%!". They'll take the time to type out 3-4 sentences about how the fielder is of questionable parentage and the GM is clearly smoking crack, and the mananger who put him there must have brain damage.

I guess rage posting is satisfying for some people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Glad one poseur AL team is out.  I hope CLE wins and knocks the other one out tomorrow. 
    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...