Jump to content

Kaleb Ort claimed by Astros.


bpilktree

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

If they need a spot you can just put Wells on 60 day dl.  He is at like 45 days already and not close to ready.  They must have seen enough of him and just needed room in Norfolk to bring other guys up.  

Yeah. You just really need to stink to get cut like this when the 40-man spot isn’t needed, that’s definitely uncommon. And he did, so maybe that’s all there is to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

There’s only so many spots in AAA. Strowd got promoted. We claimed Corbin Martin from Milwaukee. Ort gets DFA’d. Stallings gets traded. 

This should be further evidence that we flipped a AAA guy in Stallings, for the low A reliever from the Brewers. Vieira was likely just a lotto ticket. 

Long story short… we have lots of AAA depth now. 

IMG_5519.jpeg

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Malike said:

The biggest tell for me was "we didn't need an immediate roster spot".

Hmmm.  I say “we” a lot when I’m talking about the Orioles.  I think others do to.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

There’s only so many spots in AAA. Strowd got promoted. We claimed Corbin Martin from Milwaukee. Ort gets DFA’d. Stallings gets traded. 

This should be further evidence that we flipped a AAA guy in Stallings, for the low A reliever from the Brewers. Vieira was likely just a lotto ticket. 

Long story short… we have lots of AAA depth now. 

IMG_5519.jpeg

After McDermott and Povich there’s not much good depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Hmmm.  I say “we” a lot when I’m talking about the Orioles.  I think others do to.    

Sure I hope we win, we're not hitting. But when talking about a specific move on the roster I think I'd tend to use the word they to refer to the front office. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

Sure I hope we win, we're not hitting. But when talking about a specific move on the roster I think I'd tend to use the word they to refer to the front office. 

Fair point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

After McDermott and Povich there’s not much good depth.

Maybe in terms of future rotation pieces there isn’t much after McDermott and Povich, but we have a lot of guys that are “role” players.

Depth LH RP - Krook, Vespi, Gonzalez

Depth LH SP/Long Man - Zimmerman, Davidson

Depth RH Long Man - Heasley, Martin, Ambruester

Depth RH RP - Baker, Strowd, Charles

Injured Project - Nathan Webb

We’re not littered with top 30 prospects, but that’s a solid taxi squad. That’s why there wasn’t really a role for Stallings. Also, probably why we haven’t seen Seth Johnson pushed more to AAA. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Malike said:

I'm totally fishing, but I felt the same thing you did after the post. They seem well-informed.

I’ve noticed he’s a good poster that’s pretty grounded.  The bit about the  waivers not being publicly available compared to DFA is something I never knew.  Just seems like something someone “in the know” would know.  There’s been a few other things like that. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I’ve noticed he’s a good poster that’s pretty grounded.  The bit about the  waivers not being publicly available compared to DFA is something I never knew.  Just seems like something someone “in the know” would know.  There’s been a few other things like that. 

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I’ve noticed he’s a good poster that’s pretty grounded.  The bit about the  waivers not being publicly available compared to DFA is something I never knew.  Just seems like something someone “in the know” would know.  There’s been a few other things like that. 

100%. The only poster on here that might have had a chance of knowing that unique waiver rule is @DrungoHazewoodand that takes away nothing from anyone else. We all got pretty good with waiver rules under DD. Unless that tidbit was in the MLBTR article. 

I check roster resource pretty much each AM before posting just to see if I missed an injury/change/move and they didn’t have anything on Ort under transactions. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...