So on the one side of the scale, you have the responsible/appropriate development process of a 19-year-old uber-talent at the most complicated/difficult defensive position on the diamond.
And then on the other side, you have the opportunity for two months of possibly marginally upgraded hitting (and severely downgraded defense) at the backup catcher position, playing a couple days a week behind our All-Star starter.
I can definitely see why folks are torn on this.
Not an insane idea but I dont really feel he is ready. We are not getting much from McCann so Basallo wouldnt be much worse but I think they want to keep control over his service time better.
Hays was one of the bridge players along with Mounty and Mullins from the Buck years to this team. That was big. It’s not his fault we wasted those years.
Just goes to show that why would a rebuilding team that’s 2-3 years away want a Norby or Stowers?
I wish Hays the best in Philly. He fits in there.
I wanted to move them all this last offseason and let the kids have a totally open field to get past their beginning struggles and be ready to go by the end of the season. Elias decided to go the other way and force the kids to play minimum time and see what the vets had. The vets collapsed except Santander and the kids still have not had enough time to get totally past their rookie struggles. Really not the best way to do things with hindsight.
I was done with Mountcastle and Hays last year. Thought Mullins might be worth keeping. I was also done with Santander and thought they should of moved him in the offseason. I did not expect him to be hitting this much. I waa expecting a fall back. I was thinking 17-19 homeruns. Santander has been quite a surprise.
It would of let Norby and Kjerstad and Stowers and Mayo play. I would of ditched Urias and Mateo in the offseason. I think this would been the proper way to go.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.