Jump to content

Seattle is looking for a first baseman


Recommended Posts

Just watched Castillo shove for 6 innings and leave with a 1-0 lead only for it to be handed back to the Angels in the 8th. 

Scoring 1 run on the angels for the 3rd straight game has to be soul crushing. They will definitely add someone and I hope were involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

How would we rank the five starters - Castillo, Gilbert, Kirby, Miller and Woo - in terms of trade cost?

cost in return …most to least 
 

Gilbert

Kirby

Miller 

Castillo (with his contract going to the new team)

Woo

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I don’t see Seattle subtracting anyone from their current team. 

Maybe something like Mountcastle, Mullins, Bright for Hancock?

Would we make that trade?  We subtract two current starters for Hancock. 

No way. Hancock isn’t very good.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I don’t see Seattle subtracting anyone from their current team. 

Maybe something like Mountcastle, Mullins, Bright for Hancock?

Would we make that trade?  We subtract two current starters for Hancock. 

Of course you make that trade

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Of course you make that trade

I agree, but couldn’t we just buy a rental SP without subtracting from our mlb team?  Even two?  Unless, we believe in addition by subtraction with Mountcastle to get Mayo up. 

It’s not so straightforward. If it were the offseason, it’s a no brainer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I agree, but couldn’t we just buy a rental SP without subtracting from our mlb team?  Even two?  Unless, we believe in addition by subtraction with Mountcastle to get Mayo up. 

It’s not so straightforward. If it were the offseason, it’s a no brainer. 

For me personally, I would acquire 2 starters but the second starter isn’t necessarily a guarantee for this year.

A guy like Detmers or Luzardo are examples of this.

In other words, I want to make sure we get at least one starter this deal that has very good upside and multiple years of service time. If they don’t work out so be it but it’s a move I want to see.

Going after guys like that also mean you are buying them at a lower price point than perhaps their talent should allow, so I want to take advantage of that.

It’s obviously possible that could happen in the offseason but I just assume get it done now.

As for who or what to trade, I think we need to bring in 4 pitchers and maybe a RH CFer.  I think to do that and to keep our top 4 guys, trading from the ML team makes sense, especially because of what we can bring up behind those guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mariners get Arozarena. Does mean they are out on Hays or Mountcastle? They might prefer lefty bats if they are still looking for offense. 

The M’s need like 6 more bats so yes they could easily use Mountcastle or even Hays..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

For me personally, I would acquire 2 starters but the second starter isn’t necessarily a guarantee for this year.

A guy like Detmers or Luzardo are examples of this.

In other words, I want to make sure we get at least one starter this deal that has very good upside and multiple years of service time. If they don’t work out so be it but it’s a move I want to see.

Going after guys like that also mean you are buying them at a lower price point than perhaps their talent should allow, so I want to take advantage of that.

It’s obviously possible that could happen in the offseason but I just assume get it done now.

As for who or what to trade, I think we need to bring in 4 pitchers and maybe a RH CFer.  I think to do that and to keep our top 4 guys, trading from the ML team makes sense, especially because of what we can bring up behind those guys. 

All very good points and insights. If there was ever a chance for a three team trade now would be the time. 

Mariners get - Mountcastle

O’s get - one of Fedde, Eflin, Taillon, and Anderson

CWS/Cubs/TB/LAA - get a top 10 org prospect from Mariners. A top 10-20 prospect from O’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

All very good points and insights. If there was ever a chance for a three team trade now would be the time. 

Mariners get - Mountcastle

O’s get - one of Fedde, Eflin, Taillon, and Anderson

CWS/Cubs/TB/LAA - get a top 10 org prospect from Mariners. A top 10-20 prospect from O’s. 

That's a damn interesting thought. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I’m sure this question has been asked and answered a few times already, but is it safe to say yet that Eflin has been THE oily variety bohunk starting pitcher moved at the deadline? Is it even close?
    • Game is apparently going to be delayed. 
    • Yeah, it was a glorious first week of the return for Holliday. Since those first 7 games, it’s been a .478 OPS with a K rate north of 30%. That’s “black hole” territory for me. Can’t argue much with your point about big hits — the kid has been timely with the knocks he’s gotten, at least. I just get a little weary of all the “Hyde just wants to play these garbage vets because #veteranosity” stuff. The guys who have been the worst of all are kids we consider The Core: Adley, Holliday, Mayo, and Cowser in any big PA. That (along with the injuries) is what’s really causing this offense to fall short of expectations, not the much-maligned vets that Hyde “loves to play” like Urias, Mullins, Jimenez, Rivera, Slater, McCann, etc. As if Hyde would rather play several waiver-wire nobodies every game rather than just pencil in all the top prospects.
    • I don’t get why we’d want a struggling rookie on the roster in a playoff chase. It would be different if he was a good fielder or base runner. Him being here doesn’t seem to help him or the team. 
    • My best guess is that the crosschecker thought the penalties were bulls*** and didn't penalize him for them fully.   I don't actually think Stanley played bad other than the illegal formation penalties that I really don't think we should be penalizing him for.
    • Top, top post. Thank you for writing this!  Thank god we've won a few games and this place is a bit back to normal. There were a few weeks there where this place was more reactionary than a political debate on twitter.  re: the bolded, I agree, and honestly don't get it. I really don't see any Verdugo - Domínguez parallel here, and it seems a stretch to make one (for the purpose of serving an agenda or confirming a pre-existing bias?). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...