Jump to content

FIX THE DANG HITTING!


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Hyde was saying before the deadline, right after the Marlins series, that the hitting had been struggling, and asked the press if they thought the answer was to get younger?  At the time Holliday and Mayo weren’t up. I believe Norby was the temp injury fill in for Mateo. 

Being forced to play Holliday/Mayo in ride or die situations this year has really killed us. 

A couple of things…

1.  It’s tough to break in a lot of rookies/2nd year players all at once. 

2. Hindsight 20/20, the rash of pitching injuries forced Elias to buy a 2nd SP and we should’ve kept Norby as insurance. Hindsight 20/20, Holliday was the #1 overall prospect and in AAA. Mayo was having the best AAA season offensively anyone could’ve dreamed of. 

Overall, offensively we’re just a year or two away. 

Long story short… our young hitters need experience that only time will bring. 

we should’ve kept Norby as insurance.

Mateo was hurt, But Urias , Westy were still here. Also another RH bat would go missing as well. Yes it would be nice to still have Norby, but now he,s in a 2 for 23 slump with no extra base hits. All of this is showing us why this administration was so slanted towards the Vets.  This game is hard for most of the youngsters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

we should’ve kept Norby as insurance.

Mateo was hurt, But Urias , Westy were still here. Also another RH bat would go missing as well. Yes it would be nice to still have Norby, but now he,s in a 2 for 23 slump with no extra base hits. All of this is showing us why this administration was so slanted towards the Vets.  This game is hard for most of the youngsters.

Right. And as was discussed a lot on this board, breaking in several youngsters in the same year is difficult. Add to that all the pitching injuries and here we are. (I did not see the poor defense coming, though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, terpoh said:

We are certainly not being Webb on Thursday. So tomorrow is the one chance. Then we have Detroit who could make things very interesting for us.

Webb has been pretty awful his last 4 starts putting up a 6.86 ERA.  Of course with the Orioles offense that might not mean anything.  I guess we'll find out soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think last night had a lot to do with facing a guy who may be the best pitcher in baseball over the last few months. 
 

I think there are some signs if you look hard enough.  Cowser has 3 hits recently. Adley has performed better. Kjerstad looked good last night. Urias should be back soon.

Gunnar has been hitting.  OHearn ripped that double last night, something he hasn’t been doing.

Santander looks awful but that’s just how he is..he could start to heat up at any moment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

It’s been 12 games since we scored more than three runs.

The only good news on the horizon is that I don’t see any LH SPs on the schedule the rest of the way. 

Cole Irvin on his 2-week contract!     That will be quite the game thread if the epic collapse some fear is still in play.

Urias and Westburg probably will have some necessary 0-for-4's working back, but the good news is that won't be any worse than what the team has been getting.

It looks like the Hurter guy on Detroit is lefty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Cole Irvin on his 2-week contract!     That will be quite the game thread if the epic collapse some fear is still in play.

Urias and Westburg probably will have some necessary 0-for-4's working back, but the good news is that won't be any worse than what the team has been getting.

It looks like the Hurter guy on Detroit is lefty.

Yea, they've been using him as a piggy-back to an opener. 

We could miss him if he goes today or tomorrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Yea, they've been using him as a piggy-back to an opener. 

We could miss him if he goes today or tomorrow. 

It is Skubal day and an off day for Detroit so we'll probably see him, and maybe any other Toledo Mudhen Scott Harris calculates is worth streaming in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...