Jump to content

8/19 @ NY Mets


eddie83

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Wavetrapper said:

Credit to those two guys  exceptional 

I know it’s crazy but I’m not a fan of closer giving up 9th inning walkoff homers. But that’s me 

Me either but it happens once and while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

You usually aren't trying for a perfect pitch down 3-0. The bigger issue was getting down 3-0, that is on Seranthony for sure.

It was all bad that AB. In that situation, a fastball 3-0 is a cookie. Especially where Alvarez likes them. And he feasts on fastballs. Batting 300 off of them, slugging 500. Last year he slugged 700. lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Yeah, and if my mother had balls she’d be my father. But that’s not how these things work.

You’re down 3-0, that’s not a good pitch location called by Adley. Seranthony hit the spot. It’s a bad call. You can look at the scouting reports on Alvarez. The kid can hit dead red especially when he’s waiting on it. It’s not like it was in on his hands or over the zone. Don’t get cute there.

That's exactly how these things work.

Either a pitch is a good pitch or it isn't.

It has nothing to do on what the hitter does.

You can throw a bad pitch and get the out, you can throw a great pitch and get beat.

That wasn't a great 3-0 pitch but it was far from a meatball.

It was a decent 3-0 pitch and he got beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HowAboutThat said:

Back up to what? I thought that lost velocity could not be recovered and his is down 4 mph from his peak three years ago? I think that’s what it was.

First inning he was hitting 93 again. Last game, he was mostly sitting 89 maybe 90 as game went on. That kind of happened to him today as the game went on but not nearly as bad as last outing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's exactly how these things work.

Either a pitch is a good pitch or it isn't.

It has nothing to do on what the hitter does.

You can throw a bad pitch and get the out, you can throw a great pitch and get beat.

That wasn't a great 3-0 pitch but it was far from a meatball.

It was a decent 3-0 pitch and he got beat.

He got beat because it was a bad pitch to call 3-0 to a guy that only hits heaters exceptionally well. His bat speed is other worldly. Surely the O’s knew this, and being behind 3-0 is the place to be. Just throw him junk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookitsPuck said:

For Alvarez, he can’t hit sliders, curves, or changeups. Don’t know why you try to challenge him 3-0 with the only pitch he’s exceptional hitting.

Because he couldn't throw a strike with the slider?

You wanted to walk him there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookitsPuck said:

He got beat because it was a bad pitch to call 3-0 to a guy that only hits heaters exceptionally well. His bat speed is other worldly. Surely the O’s knew this, and being behind 3-0 is the place to be. Just throw him junk. 

So you wanted to walk him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because he couldn't throw a strike with the slider?

You wanted to walk him there?

Instead of giving him a cookie? Hell yeah with the bottom of the Mets lineup which is abysmal coming up. Didn’t have issues throwing a slider for a strike last AB.

And the 2 sliders to Alvarez weren’t even awful.

Edited by LookitsPuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you wanted to walk him.

I wanted him not to throw the only pitch that Alvarez can clobber 3-0. If he walks, so be it. It’s Tyrone Taylor and Harrison Bader coming up. They are terrible.

Edited by LookitsPuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
    • Recency bias: "Is a common distorting effect within systems of performance appraisal. It refers to the appraiser assessing employee performance, not on work undertaken across the full performance management cycle, but only on recent events or activities that can be readily recalled. Recency bias can be countered by keeping a record of appraisee performance over the full period of work that is being appraised." https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100407676
    • You're right, I shouldn't assume he's a hole. More of an unknown (11 career AB). Still, an outfield of Slater, one unknown, and one hole isn't exactly ideal. I think Mountcastle 1B/Santander RF is pretty clearly preferable to Santander 1B/Kjerstad RF vs LHP when you include defense.
    • I forget which game it was (Fri or Sat) but he also pulled a ball foul down the LF line that nearly snuck inside the pole. So he was close to having 2 HRs in the series
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...