Jump to content

Most disappointing prospects of 2024?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Who would you say disappointed you most in 2024?

Among the position players, I’d go with Dylan Beavers.  He had an .894 OPS in 159 PA at Bowie last year, and mirrored that the first 33 games this season with an .890 OPS in 140 PA.   But from there he slumped badly and his OPS today stands at .757 with 5 games to play.  I haven’t written him off by any means, but it’s been a very disappointing season for him.   

On the pitching side, I’d go with Luis De Leon.   Last year he jumped from the FCL (where he had a 1.65 ERA) to Delmarva (2.39).  He started this year dominating at Delmarva again (2.25), and was quickly promoted to Aberdeen, but he never really found his footing there, posting a 5.73 ERA and a 1.877 WHIP.  He’s youngish (21) for the league, so there’s time for him to regroup next year, but I’d hoped for a lot more from him.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeLeon's shocking regression at Aberdeen has to be the biggest one for me. His command literally looked like it disappeared (Career worse 6.3 BB/9) and not only that, his strike out rate dropped (career low 9.8/9). 

The good news is his GB rate was pretty steady (59.1%) and his FIP (4.46) and xFIP (4.34) out paced his ERA (5.73). 

Stuff wise, his changeup regressed, but his slider improved movement wise, and probably led to some of the walks. He threw way too many uncompetitive pitches.

He allowed A+ batters to slash .289/.397/.384/.782 but some of that was attributed to a .379 BABIP, partially driven by Aberdeen's sometimes awful defense behind him. 

He's definitely got big time relief vibes to him so he can't be written off, but at 21-years old, he was a disappointment in his first go through the Sally League.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deleon would be my answer by far…I just wonder if the way they yo-yo’ed him between starting and relieving, once he got to Aberdeen, effected him at all?

Its hard for me to give the org the benefit of the doubt on how they develop pitching, so I wonder if that’s an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three weeks ago and this would've been a near slam dunk for EBJ.  Overall, we've been pretty lucky.  I don't believe we've had any big injuries.  Unfortunately, the injury bug hit us at the MLB level.  

I'll go with Beavers, DeLeon, Honeycutt, and Fabian.  Admittedly, a high bar for Honeycutt, but I was hoping he'd hit the ground running.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Jackson Holliday.

I was expecting more than shaky defense at second and a 57 OPS+.

 

Yeah not to derail the thread but this is a good answer. I just do not understand why these stud guys keep coming up and being total zeroes at the plate.  I get they’re not going to rake right away but these dudes can’t bat .100. I would think someone like Jud Fabian could at least do that. Adjustment period or no, It doesn’t make sense to me just HOW bad these guys have been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a small sample size but I am disappointed in how Honeycutt started. Not everyone gets going like Colton Cowser did, but .176/.250/.196 with 43% strikeouts is rough.

Fabian didn't disappoint me, he's always been a Ryan McKenna type for me.

I still like Beavers as a strong-side platoon bat who can play all over the OF and steal bases. Eddie Rosario is a guy who comes to mind. I'm interested to see how he does next year in Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mac Horvath would be a big one for me. 

Came out of the gate raking last year, smoked the FCL and the Carolina League and the Sally League in succession. Small sample, obviously, but 100 PAs at a .321/.455/.603/1.057 is checking all the boxes for a draftee. Looked like the next graduate of the Orioles School for Hitcraft and Bat Wizardry.

And then he goes back to Aberdeen and limps to a .745 OPS, eventually ending up as a secondary piece in the Eflin deal.  A very disappointing end after coming out of the gates looking like a star in the making.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Jackson Holliday.

I was expecting more than shaky defense at second and a 57 OPS+.

 

Agree, I don't think this is a terrible answer at all.

I'd probably also second Braylin Tavera and Luis DeLeon.

Max Wagner also couldn't stay healthy and had terrible performance when he did play.

Justin Armbruester was a guy who some thought might help in the bullpen this year or maybe even be a darkhorse to get some starts, and he was horrendous at AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Jackson Holliday.

I was expecting more than shaky defense at second and a 57 OPS+.

 

Not the worse answer. People can make excuses all they want, his first go through the majors has been a major flop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, luismatos4prez said:

It's such a small sample size but I am disappointed in how Honeycutt started. Not everyone gets going like Colton Cowser did, but .176/.250/.196 with 43% strikeouts is rough.

Fabian didn't disappoint me, he's always been a Ryan McKenna type for me.

I still like Beavers as a strong-side platoon bat who can play all over the OF and steal bases. Eddie Rosario is a guy who comes to mind. I'm interested to see how he does next year in Norfolk.

I know there are no rules, but it's kinda tough to give a guy just drafted with less than 60 professional PAS who had been shutdown for over a month from competitive baseball. Honeycutt's start is not impressive and the K rate is something to to keep an eye on, but I personally don't think you can't call him the "most disappointing prospect" for this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I'm most disappointed in guys like Braylin Tavera and Leandro Arias who looked very promising as 18-year olds last year in the FCL, but have been a disaster at Delmarva this year.  

Tavera has been a disaster. Arias has been fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the case of both Honeycutt and Holliday, I wouldn't pick them because my personal expectations weren't as high as other people's.   I'm certainly disappointed in both but I don't think my long-run expectation has been affected a lot by this year's performance.   In Beavers' case, I had some hopes he'd deserve a top 5 prospect rating once all the Norfolk prospects graduated.   I probably bought into last year's Bowie numbers a little too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...