Jump to content

Elias taking accountability


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Drafting strategies aside, I don't see how anyone can point at Elias and say 'this is your fault'.  First of all, he's still built a playoff team (probably - I still hesitate to assume this, though just a couple more wins would ease my mind) even though half the team is missing (some more unexpectedly than others).  Second of all, the dregs he's had to pull up here lately haven't even been THAT bad considering how far down the depth chart they are/were.  Rivera has hit OK, L Soto in a VERY small size has at least shown a good glove.  He took a shot on Eloy and that hasn't really worked out, but it didn't cost much of anything to try.  I really don't know what people would have expected him to do.

If anything, you could argue that the criticism he faced about not bringing up Holliday and Mayo sooner, rings pretty hollow given how bad they have been now that they are here.  Would they be any better here today if they had been playing in the majors for the last three months or whatever?  Hard to say, but at the rate they've been hitting, I don't know how any team could have given them the rope they apparently need.

Exactly. Altho it's perilous to say on this forum, I wish Elias's typical caution with bringing up AAA stars had gone to the extent that Holliday and Mayo had not been plugged into the crucial roles that have been clearly too much for them to shoulder at this point in their development. Fortunately, Urías will soon be back and the earlier Westberg returns the better. Until then, give me Soto at 2nd base and Rivera at 3rd--and kudos to ME when they succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I heard was a lot of word salad. Bottom line is the players and the manager have to perform better.

Elias will be judged in how he manages the off season. Including, dumping every single hitting coach in the organization and going back to a measured hitting approach instead of always swinging for the fences.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think anyone should really blame him.  We lost 3 infield starters and a DH/Of because of injuries in a matter of about a month all while trading away Hays, Norby, and Stowers just before that.  All those guys couldn’t get bats here at the time because of our depth and were major league players or had nothing to prove in minors.  I am sure if he knew Westburg was going to get hit in the hand and be out two months he would have probably kept Norby but it happened 1 day to late.   Holliday and or Mayo could have been eased in better without those injuries giving Westburg, Urias, and even Mateo most the time and Holliday playing in spots if they were healthy.  

Our season to some extant is looking just like the Rays last year as we both got out to hot starts then the injuries started to mount up and we have held the ship afloat best we could because we both did have so much depth.  They had serious injuries to there starting rotation but kept filling in guys til they ran out of guys and couldn’t hold us off down the stretch.  The same type thing has happened to us and we are limping into the playoff like they did.  There guys never came back though so they saw a quick exit in the first round and I think we see same thing unless a few of our guys come back and get up to speed fast but time is running out.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, dtk9119 said:

All I heard was a lot of word salad. Bottom line is the players and the manager have to perform better.

Elias will be judged in how he manages the off season. Including, dumping every single hitting coach in the organization and going back to a measured hitting approach instead of always swinging for the fences.

Right.  The team has scored the 5th most runs in baseball, and has the 2nd best OPS+, so let’s fire all the hitting coaches because the team had a month-long slump.  Got it.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fiver6565 said:

Drafting strategies aside, I don't see how anyone can point at Elias and say 'this is your fault'.  First of all, he's still built a playoff team (probably - I still hesitate to assume this, though just a couple more wins would ease my mind) even though half the team is missing (some more unexpectedly than others).  Second of all, the dregs he's had to pull up here lately haven't even been THAT bad considering how far down the depth chart they are/were.  Rivera has hit OK, L Soto in a VERY small size has at least shown a good glove.  He took a shot on Eloy and that hasn't really worked out, but it didn't cost much of anything to try.  I really don't know what people would have expected him to do.

If anything, you could argue that the criticism he faced about not bringing up Holliday and Mayo sooner, rings pretty hollow given how bad they have been now that they are here.  Would they be any better here today if they had been playing in the majors for the last three months or whatever?  Hard to say, but at the rate they've been hitting, I don't know how any team could have given them the rope they apparently need.

Are you serious? They did a great job drafting. He’s gotten lucky picking guys off the scrap heap or waiver wire.  But, most of the deadline trades have been poor both this year and last. Efflin is the only trade he clearly made the right decision on. I don’t think he deserves a pass for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Are you serious? They did a great job drafting. He’s gotten lucky picking guys off the scrap heap or waiver wire.  But, most of the deadline trades have been poor both this year and last. Efflin is the only trade he clearly made the right decision on. I don’t think he deserves a pass for that. 

What does ‘a pass’ even mean?  If you’re expecting perfection I don’t know what to tell ya. His sell trades in 2022 worked out nicely. He hasn’t paid much for the misses IMO (not looking to get into a Rogers trade argument here). His off season trades have been quite good. Why limit to just deadline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

What does ‘a pass’ even mean?  If you’re expecting perfection I don’t know what to tell ya. His sell trades in 2022 worked out nicely. He hasn’t paid much for the misses IMO (not looking to get into a Rogers trade argument here). His off season trades have been quite good. Why limit to just deadline?

It means he’s sucked at trading. You’re suggesting this isn’t his fault. It is … the offense has collapsed. Yes there were injuries but he traded good prospects for marginal upgrades Jiménez, Riviera , Rogers, they could’ve done just as bad on waiver wire players. 

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

It means he’s sucked at trading. You’re suggesting this isn’t his fault. It is … the offense has collapsed. Yes there were injuries but he traded good prospects for marginal upgrades Jiménez, Riviera , Rogers, they could’ve done just as bad on waiver wire players. 

Rivera was a waiver claim…

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Has anyone asked him why our top prospects struggle so much when they come to the majors?  Rookies on other teams with much weaker credentials have not struggled out of the gate the way that Coby Mayo, Jackson Holliday, Adley Rustchman and Colton Cowser have.  

Don't lump Rutschman in that group. He's in year 3 for goodness sakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...