Jump to content

I'm torn over Taillon vs Machado


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

check out this link

http://rise.espn.go.com/baseball/articles/2010/05/MAG-Manny-Machado-feature.aspx

It certainly would be hard to pass up on Taillon. My father taught me since I was very little "good pitching beats good hitting....every time."

And Hernandez, Arrieta, Tillman have had their ups and downs. Same with Hobgood. There's plenty of time for these guys to develop into stud pitchers, but you can never have enough pitching.

But our system is barren when it comes to position prospects, especially shorstop. Miclat and Givens will get a chance this year to showcase their abilities. Garabez Rosa is hitting well in Low-A. It sure would be nice to have Machado in the fold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

check out this link

http://rise.espn.go.com/baseball/articles/2010/05/MAG-Manny-Machado-feature.aspx

It certainly would be hard to pass up on Taillon. My father taught me since I was very little "good pitching beats good hitting....every time."

And Hernandez, Arrieta, Tillman have had their ups and downs. Same with Hobgood. There's plenty of time for these guys to develop into stud pitchers, but you can never have enough pitching.

But our system is barren when it comes to position prospects, especially shorstop. Miclat and Givens will get a chance this year to showcase their abilities. Garabez Rosa is hitting well in Low-A. It sure would be nice to have Machado in the fold.

I guess, but IMO we are looking at 2 different tier levels. To me Machado is not top 5, but maybe ALOT has changed since I last looked at him, he has a ton of projection, has he started to fill into it and hitting with some good pop or something?

I dunno, but Taillon will bring to our farm system a true #1 SP, something we don't right now have in the system, and technically something we haven't had in years(Matusz wasn't and isn't considered a true or traditional #1 though he seems to be becoming one). This guy has Strasburgesque ceiling and a decent chance of reaching it(really his command is holding him back).

Personally, I'd be a bit more torn between Whitson and Taillon...

Did Harvey pitch well throughout the entire season? I saw him mocked in the mid 1st round which is tremendous considering how far he had fallen. I am guessing he still showed some inconsistency....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be very difficult for me to miss out on taking Machado, but Taillon has to be the pick if he falls (and Harper is already selected) to #3.

I've been a big Machado guy since the pre-season, and am ten times more enamored of his abilities now. So we are kindred spirits here Doc... we will only get to choose one. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If i had to choose between the two i still say we go with Taillon. The more top tier pitchers we have the more expendable some of them become. If we can somehow work a trade to Milwaukee and nab Fielder before he becomes a FA (only if he agrees to sign a deal with us) it will be worth it. We already have (in no particular ranking or order) Britton, Hobgood, Arrietta, Matusz, Tillman, and Erbe along with a couple of more good arms. We add Taillon in there then we are sitting pretty. Were not going to outspend 65% of the teams out there but we do have a very good farm system that is better then most. If Pitt takes Taillon or Machado then obviously JJ won't have a tough choice. But if both fall to us. I would vote Taillon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a reliable source for Taillon's stats? Why are they such a mystery? Sounds fishy?

Nathan Rhode is collecting the stats for all the HS kids over at BA. They will be posted there, probably next week. Why on earth would it be "fishy"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a reliable source for Taillon's stats? Why are they such a mystery? Sounds fishy?

Reliable, up-to-date stats for prep kids are usually pretty hard to come by. They are also pretty hard to read into, given the varying levels of talent between regions, teams, and individual players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a reliable source for Taillon's stats? Why are they such a mystery? Sounds fishy?

Stotle, as usual, is right. However, I have contacted Taillon's coach and have requested the info... hopefully he'll reply before Rode's update. Regardless, all the stats will be out shortly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stotle, as usual, is right. However, I have contacted Taillon's coach and have requested the info... hopefully he'll reply before Rode's update. Regardless, all the stats will be out shortly.

Thanks Greg.

However, Taillon's season has been over. Why aren't they out now? It just seems odd that such a supreme talent isn't advertising his awesomeness weekly. No?

If he's so great why aren't they on his HS website or his personal website?

http://jamesontaillon.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Greg.

However, Taillon's season has been over. Why aren't they out now? It just seems odd that such a supreme talent isn't advertising his awesomeness weekly. No?

If he's so great why aren't they on his HS website or his personal website?

http://jamesontaillon.com/

Don't have answers for you, although -again- it's pretty common to have difficulties gathering stats for HS'ers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...