Jump to content

RHP -Dan Klein comes in at #6


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

There was an update about how he was fixing his mehanics now after the injury so he could still have starter potential.

Unfortunately, if it were that simple he would have done it by now. I'm not saying Erbe can't smooth out his mechanics, but to use the injury as some sort of "do-over" when it comes to mechanics is "puff-piece" material at it's best.

Let's just see what his stuff looks like when he returns from the injury before we worry about his future role. Right now he just needs to overcome so serious odds just to regain his old stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Unfortunately, if it were that simple he would have done it by now. I'm not saying Erbe can't smooth out his mechanics, but to use the injury as some sort of "do-over" when it comes to mechanics is "puff-piece" material at it's best.

Let's just see what his stuff looks like when he returns from the injury before we worry about his future role. Right now he just needs to overcome so serious odds just to regain his old stuff.

Yeah, particularly considering he was reportedly re-doing his mechanics ad nauseum with Dave Schmidt (??) for the year + prior to becoming injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among pitchers I would probably have to put him 2nd or 3rd depending on how heavy you consider the possibility of Bridwell picking up velocity. Right now I think you have Britton, Klein and Bridwell and then the others...

I'd be more comfortable with the rankings after seeing Klein pitch for myself. I didn't catch him at Aberdeen and I'm going off other's reports on him.

Would you put him ahead of Hoes and Avery based off of upside/potential?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony...if you look at him in terms of just pure talent and upside, where do you rank him in our system?

Not Tony, but to chime in here, you mean when taking safety or probability out of the equation? Based on pure upside, there are a handful of guys who COULD be better than Klein, but the probability of that happening is what keeps their names out of everyone's mouth.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you put him ahead of Hoes and Avery based off of upside/potential?

That's really hard to say because right now Bridwell is a lot of projection. Hoes upside could be as a Cano-type guy and Avery is still hard to judge right now, but his plate discipline drops him a notch for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among pitchers I would probably have to put him 2nd or 3rd depending on how heavy you consider the possibility of Bridwell picking up velocity. Right now I think you have Britton, Klein and Bridwell and then the others...

I'd be more comfortable with the rankings after seeing Klein pitch for myself. I didn't catch him at Aberdeen and I'm going off other's reports on him.

I am no expert. But he threw free and easy. Not even close to a max effort guy. Seemed like he had more in the fastball if he needed some. His curve was very sharp the night we saw him. I am also very enthused about Clayton Schrader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klein was very impressive in the CWS. He commanded a good fastball, and his curve was MLB quality. Mixed pitches well, looked good out of the stretch. He is amazingly polished, considering that he has ~80 competitive IP since high school.

He was not your typical college closer. He looked more like a top shelf four-pitch college starting pitcher, finishing his third year.

On the basis of talent and present ability, I couldn't believe that he was there in the third round. Obviously the injury concerns and his status as a college reliever factored into it. But this guy can pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klein was very impressive in the CWS. He commanded a good fastball, and his curve was MLB quality. Mixed pitches well, looked good out of the stretch. He is amazingly polished, considering that he has ~80 competitive IP since high school.

He was not your typical college closer. He looked more like a top shelf four-pitch college starting pitcher, finishing his third year.

On the basis of talent and present ability, I couldn't believe that he was there in the third round. Obviously the injury concerns and his status as a college reliever factored into it. But this guy can pitch.

Agree with almost all of this. I saw a fair amount of him this year and I'd say that as good as his curve is, it really played up because he burried it so much and got swings-and-misses. I'd like to see him throw it for strikes with more frequency, but that is probably nitpicking.

As a closer, though, his draft stock was hurt by his velocity, I think. You can't argue with the results, but many evaluators viewed him as a set-up arm down the line, rather than a potential closer the likes of Chapman (Florida -- who actually ended-up dropping due to injury concerns), Swaggerty (ASU), or Tillman (Fla. Sou.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, if it were that simple he would have done it by now. I'm not saying Erbe can't smooth out his mechanics, but to use the injury as some sort of "do-over" when it comes to mechanics is "puff-piece" material at it's best.

Let's just see what his stuff looks like when he returns from the injury before we worry about his future role. Right now he just needs to overcome so serious odds just to regain his old stuff.

I dunno, but I never ever ever realized his arm action was so funky. IMO, it wouldn't have mattered whether he was a SP or a RP, the injuries would have occured. The arm action and the wrap put so much strain on the shoulder....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...