Jump to content

RHP -Dan Klein comes in at #6


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

There was an update about how he was fixing his mehanics now after the injury so he could still have starter potential.

Unfortunately, if it were that simple he would have done it by now. I'm not saying Erbe can't smooth out his mechanics, but to use the injury as some sort of "do-over" when it comes to mechanics is "puff-piece" material at it's best.

Let's just see what his stuff looks like when he returns from the injury before we worry about his future role. Right now he just needs to overcome so serious odds just to regain his old stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Unfortunately, if it were that simple he would have done it by now. I'm not saying Erbe can't smooth out his mechanics, but to use the injury as some sort of "do-over" when it comes to mechanics is "puff-piece" material at it's best.

Let's just see what his stuff looks like when he returns from the injury before we worry about his future role. Right now he just needs to overcome so serious odds just to regain his old stuff.

Yeah, particularly considering he was reportedly re-doing his mechanics ad nauseum with Dave Schmidt (??) for the year + prior to becoming injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among pitchers I would probably have to put him 2nd or 3rd depending on how heavy you consider the possibility of Bridwell picking up velocity. Right now I think you have Britton, Klein and Bridwell and then the others...

I'd be more comfortable with the rankings after seeing Klein pitch for myself. I didn't catch him at Aberdeen and I'm going off other's reports on him.

Would you put him ahead of Hoes and Avery based off of upside/potential?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony...if you look at him in terms of just pure talent and upside, where do you rank him in our system?

Not Tony, but to chime in here, you mean when taking safety or probability out of the equation? Based on pure upside, there are a handful of guys who COULD be better than Klein, but the probability of that happening is what keeps their names out of everyone's mouth.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you put him ahead of Hoes and Avery based off of upside/potential?

That's really hard to say because right now Bridwell is a lot of projection. Hoes upside could be as a Cano-type guy and Avery is still hard to judge right now, but his plate discipline drops him a notch for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among pitchers I would probably have to put him 2nd or 3rd depending on how heavy you consider the possibility of Bridwell picking up velocity. Right now I think you have Britton, Klein and Bridwell and then the others...

I'd be more comfortable with the rankings after seeing Klein pitch for myself. I didn't catch him at Aberdeen and I'm going off other's reports on him.

I am no expert. But he threw free and easy. Not even close to a max effort guy. Seemed like he had more in the fastball if he needed some. His curve was very sharp the night we saw him. I am also very enthused about Clayton Schrader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klein was very impressive in the CWS. He commanded a good fastball, and his curve was MLB quality. Mixed pitches well, looked good out of the stretch. He is amazingly polished, considering that he has ~80 competitive IP since high school.

He was not your typical college closer. He looked more like a top shelf four-pitch college starting pitcher, finishing his third year.

On the basis of talent and present ability, I couldn't believe that he was there in the third round. Obviously the injury concerns and his status as a college reliever factored into it. But this guy can pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klein was very impressive in the CWS. He commanded a good fastball, and his curve was MLB quality. Mixed pitches well, looked good out of the stretch. He is amazingly polished, considering that he has ~80 competitive IP since high school.

He was not your typical college closer. He looked more like a top shelf four-pitch college starting pitcher, finishing his third year.

On the basis of talent and present ability, I couldn't believe that he was there in the third round. Obviously the injury concerns and his status as a college reliever factored into it. But this guy can pitch.

Agree with almost all of this. I saw a fair amount of him this year and I'd say that as good as his curve is, it really played up because he burried it so much and got swings-and-misses. I'd like to see him throw it for strikes with more frequency, but that is probably nitpicking.

As a closer, though, his draft stock was hurt by his velocity, I think. You can't argue with the results, but many evaluators viewed him as a set-up arm down the line, rather than a potential closer the likes of Chapman (Florida -- who actually ended-up dropping due to injury concerns), Swaggerty (ASU), or Tillman (Fla. Sou.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, if it were that simple he would have done it by now. I'm not saying Erbe can't smooth out his mechanics, but to use the injury as some sort of "do-over" when it comes to mechanics is "puff-piece" material at it's best.

Let's just see what his stuff looks like when he returns from the injury before we worry about his future role. Right now he just needs to overcome so serious odds just to regain his old stuff.

I dunno, but I never ever ever realized his arm action was so funky. IMO, it wouldn't have mattered whether he was a SP or a RP, the injuries would have occured. The arm action and the wrap put so much strain on the shoulder....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...