Jump to content

4th Round - Kyle Simon - RHP - University of Arizona


Recommended Posts

BA 183. Seems to sit 86-89 with peak at 93 - deception in delivery. Hopefully, some things JJ sees to be corrected ... or JJ was asked to get some bp help quickly.

Interesting pick .... probably one of the weaker write-ups in a JJ top 5 pick in a long time, IMO.

Maybe, but Jordan has focused on velocity guys with injury histories and have been burned a lot. Maybe he's now looking for healthy command/sinker guys. When you play 81 games in Camden Yards, that might not be a bad idea. I honestly like what I'm readind if his velocity can sit 88-91 with good sink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Osich sounds good...If Delmonico or Fischer are still there, either of them would be good as well(not 100% sure if they are there or not but I don't think they have been drafted).

Don't you wonder why others aren't taking them either?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I bet you can get a similar guy to that in a few rounds...Meanwhile, you could be drafting better talent right now.

As Stotle said about the Wright pick, if you want him as a reliever, wait...if you want him as a starter, draft the safer bet to be a starter.

The logic isn't there...Its all about signability and them not spending enough.

Its just so irritating to see them piss away money like they do on the ML team but not do enough amateur wise. They just don't get it.

I'll wait until I hear what Jordan has to say about these guys before I start thinking signability. Jordan has been known to take the overslot guys in the 6-12th rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but Jordan has focused on velocity guys with injury histories and have been burned a lot. Maybe he's now looking for healthy command/sinker guys. When you play 81 games in Camden Yards, that might not be a bad idea. I honestly like what I'm readind if his velocity can sit 88-91 with good sink.

There is no doubt in my mind that JJ has seen Simon or has reports that Simon has better velo than what BA is reporting. Simon has the big frame that JJ loves.

I also trust our scouts who have seen very few low minors flame-outs among our first five rounders.

I am fine with the draft so far. JJ goes very close to slot in 2-4 or so and then starts popping the HS guys in like Narron, Bundy, Ohlman in the these next few rounds.

It is unusual for JJ to pop a relief pitcher in the first five rounds and he may have done it twice already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you wonder why others aren't taking them either?

No...I don't really care.

If they are signability question marks, that shouldn't be the issue. These guys are consensus top 50-75 guys...At this point in the draft, you are getting great value.

Spend the money and get the best players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll wait until I hear what Jordan has to say about these guys before I start thinking signability. Jordan has been known to take the overslot guys in the 6-12th rounds.

And that would be great...But those guys are sitting there right now....Take them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, its not that I mind taking potential power relievers early on either...I loved the Klein pick last year, as a reliever.

My point is that in this draft, with the depth that it has, you wait on those guys IMO.

You probably could have had Wright in the 5th or 6th round and gotten the better starting pitching prospect in the 3rd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stotle on Simon:

He was a 5th/6th rounder for me. Doesn't have a big arm, so he's stuck between "blow it out in an inning" or "dial back for the long haul". Groundball guy, good ratios, but I have a hard time picturing him throwing harder than 87-89 mph as a starter. Maybe softer than that. Back-end arm or a 7th inning guy in the pen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that would be great...But those guys are sitting there right now....Take them!

What if you can get them later? That waiting game is all part of the skill of the draft. The one thing the Orioles are pretty good at is knowing where guys will fall. It's way too early to get excited or upset at this draft so far in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if you can get them later? That waiting game is all part of the skill of the draft. The one thing the Orioles are pretty good at is knowing where guys will fall. It's way too early to get excited or upset at this draft so far in my opinion.

Tony, I don't see why it is wrong to be upset that this team is allowing better talent to go past them, as they reach for lesser players. How is that ever a good strategy?

BTW, I fully expect them to get a good talent or 2 later as an overslot type guy. I am not saying it won't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Joey Ortiz is currently hitting .261/.359/.466/.825 over 88 AB which works out to a 135 OPS+ .  He's playing pretty much everyday in Milwaukee against both RHP and LHP.  Maybe the O's are being too cute with all the platooning etc., and it's time to pick a direction with some of these guys and stick with it.
    • It seems unnecessarily risky to try Verlander as closer. We have a legit shot at our first WS birth in over 40 years (while Adley is in year 3 and Henderson and Westburg are in year 2). I would hate to gamble with our chances which increases the variance of the results when we can just go out and get a legitimate effective closer who has already experienced success in that role.  IMO the present opportunity that we have this season is too promising to pass up. The Blue Jays and White Sox are examples of how swiftly things can change.
    • Thoughts - Some guys adjust quicker than others. But there is no magic formula. Look around the game, there are plenty of top tier prospects who are/have struggled in the last few years. Also, from reading your post, you seem to be grouping McKenna, Norby, Cowser, Stowers, Kjerstad, Mayo, and Holliday altogether. There are different tiers of prospect rankings/talents among them. McKenna is not nor ever has been a highly rated prospect in terms of top 100 rankings. He is a classic AAAA guy. Stowers is 26 at this point and again was never a highly rated prospect in terms of top 100. He is not too old to be considered a prospect at this point. And Kjerstad (who had 2 years taken away from him due to his health) is on his way to being considered no longer a prospect at age 25. Cowser, Mayo, and Holliday are the more highly thought of (more talented) of the group that you listed. Cowser is in the midst of acclimating to what it means to find success at this level. Mayo is a little further behind in that process as he has not been at the Bigs yet, and Holliday while the most talented of the group is the youngest and least experienced of all. I don't think it is realistic to think in terms of wholesale replacements - i.e. ship this group in and in comes the next group to replace each one for one and get as good or better results. MLB in 2024 simply doesn't work that way. The jump from AAA to the Big League level is probably greater/harder than ever.
    • I think McKenna could play for a team like the Reds. I will root for him. 
    • Sorry. I missed the tone. It has been a rough week for reasons completely unrelated to the Orioles and I took that of context and sent an unnecessary reply. I see that now. No excuses. I’ll do better.
    • I checked the schedule and there are plenty of make up opportunities for tonight's game. 1) Double header tomorrow (due to 12:30ish start time; end of series) 2) Double header 7/31 (due to 12:30ish start time; end of series) 3) This Thursday 5/16; mutual off day, we stay on home stand, Jays travel to Tampa That being said, this gets a bit more cramped if both games get rained out. 
    • I can assure OP that Mckenna isn't a prospect. Heck he's not even in the organization. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...