Jump to content

Edwin Jackson: Interested?


SilentJames

Recommended Posts

I think Jackson is gonna cost to much for the O's taste. I would much rather go after Chen. The one guy im very very interested in that no one is talking about is Hisashi Iwakuma. The A's paid $19.1 million in posting fee's to negotiate with Iwakuma last winter. He sits in the 91-93 mph range but can touch 96 mph. He has a deceptive delivery and has a nice arsenal including a nasty forkball thats unhittable at times. I would love to see us go out and land Chen and Iwakuma. Here are a couple Vids of Iwakuma.

[video=youtube_share;kgLjgoIf4CY]http://youtu.be/kgLjgoIf4CY

[video=youtube_share;8d3t27GaLsA]http://youtu.be/8d3t27GaLsA

I would certainly be interested at the right price but looking at the numbers it appears that Wada is better than Iwakuma. (At least last season)

Iwakuma http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker&utm_campaign=Linker&id=iwakum001his#standard_pitching::none

Wada http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker&utm_campaign=Linker&id=wada--001tsu#standard_pitching::none

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply
As I have said, Jackson is a better pitcher than Guthrie but I am not sure I would expect better results than what Guthrie has given us.

8-12 wins, 3.8-4.25 ERA. That is what I would expect from Jackson.

His peripherals would likely be better than Guthrie but seeing as Guthrie outperforms his peripherals usually, I just don't see a difference in actual results.

I would be fine with a 2 year deal....a 3 year deal is tolerable(no more than 10M per)...anything beyond that is poor.

Problem is Jackson will sign with a number of teams before Baltimore if all we offer is the going rate. We need to outbid another team for his services, assuming Jackson has legitimate interest from other clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a good comparison but only over the past 3 years rather than their whole careers. Here's the Fangraphs article that compares the two of them:

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/john-danks-the-left-handed-edwin-jackson/

The core of the article is taking these rates over the past 3 years (sorry for the formatting):

Name BB% K% GB% ERA- FIP- xFIP-

Jackson 7.9 18.5 44.0 93 92 95

Danks 7.7 18.2 44.5 90 92 96

Jackson has been a very solid pitcher for three consecutive seasons and anything in the annual 10-12MM range would probably be a good deal. He's young enough that 3 years shouldn't be too concerning, and if the 4th year is on a 4 yr, 36-42MM deal I would still think that's worthwhile.

Yupp that was the article I was refering to and of course the last three years is a much better gauge of how the pitchers are now versus eight years ago...Now as I said look at the contract Danks just got versus what Edwin is expected to get.

I would argue Jackson is more important to us than Danks is to the White Sox in terms of impact on our team.

I thinkthis is a good move for us as long as the contract doesn't get crazy....Unlike others on the board I think that him with the Dana and Wada which were very good pick ups for us, we have the making of a deep staff with some upside.

Guthrie, Edwin, Britton, Wada and another Hunter or Dana or Jake is the makings of a nice starting five even though if I had my way we would trade Guthrie after signing Edwin...

Now all we need to do is upgrade our D in a real way and I think our team could surprise alot of people.

By the way just saw that Danas curvball is very similar to gio gonzalaz and erik bedards CB according to pitch fx I think he may turn out to be a very good pickup for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could get him for about three years 27 million.

We need pitching with upside, however we acquire it. If we waste money, we should waste it on pitching with upside. If we over pay, we should over pay for pitching with upside. If we go an extra year, it should be for pitching with upside. The Markakis and Roberts contracts were not the correct allocation of our limited resources. If we nivest, gamble, take a chance, it needs to always be for pitching with upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need pitching with upside, however we acquire it. If we waste money, we should waste it on pitching with upside. If we over pay, we should over pay for pitching with upside. If we go an extra year, it should be for pitching with upside. The Markakis and Roberts contracts were not the correct allocation of our limited resources. If we nivest, gamble, take a chance, it needs to always be for pitching with upside.

Would you consider Jackson "pitching with upside"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need starting pitching so bad that I would be willing to give him up to 4 years and 50 million...do you guys realize our starters were historically bad in terms of relative to the rest of the league this guy has been almost a 4 win pitcher the last three years very consistent too....I would argue he would improve are team more than any in the league I mean were looking at a 6 win swing in WAR..

That is superstar, all world type swing in WAR, if theres any team in the league who should overpay for pitching its us...please get this guy DD please...

By the way we also had the worst D in the league so unless we improve that this is a waste and we might as well forfiet anyway.

Our weakness of pitching and D, our the most glaring weaknesses in the league and I hope DD can see it...I am sure he can thats why he got Endy who has more value to us than any team in the league .

DD please upgrade our defense please please please if they start Mark Reynolds at third at all this year (more than ten games anyway) we are the dumbest team in the league and if I am an orioles pitcher I am asking for a trade right away or I am going on the DL with depression...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is Jackson will sign with a number of teams before Baltimore if all we offer is the going rate. We need to outbid another team for his services, assuming Jackson has legitimate interest from other clubs.

Right....He is going to get a 3/30 type deal from a good team. We will need to go higher..or, in other words, do something stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right....He is going to get a 3/30 type deal from a good team. We will need to go higher..or, in other words, do something stupid.

We should go 4/44 then, unless you want to see our 5.32 starters ERA again and another 95 losses..or we can sign him and get 200 innings of 4,2 ERA he's gonna give us with a 3.5 xFip cuz our D is god awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right....He is going to get a 3/30 type deal from a good team. We will need to go higher..or, in other words, do something stupid.

Because we know giving him say 3/36 and spending that extra $2 million a year would just cripple this franchise. Or that extra year at 4/40-42 million....devastating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...