Jump to content

Sun:Grimsley names 3 O's in banned drug case


TWpj

Recommended Posts

There might be a third option, ie.....you didn't know you took steroids, as Palmerio claimed. And this whole mess again raises the possibility he was telling the truth.

Not really. The type of steroid found in Palmeiro is NOT something that could just get in your supplements or something. Its also something that takes a long time to clear your system and is nearly impossible to conceal. This is something you'd have to intentionally take and it was not Tejada's stuff since it was tested and came up clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Anybody who has used & lied about it after the fact really bothers me.

I agree. A short succint apology for making a "mistake" would go a long way. We're a forgiving country. Also, if that happens, it allows the media vultures to focus on Clemens and Bonds guys who are still being stubborn. It might be an interesting PR startegy. Do it in the offseason when there's no games and by the time the season starts up again, everyone will have basically forgotten about it (Giambi!).

Then again I doubt it happens because these players are probably being advised from all legal councel to just not say a word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. The type of steroid found in Palmeiro is NOT something that could just get in your supplements or something. Its also something that takes a long time to clear your system and is nearly impossible to conceal. This is something you'd have to intentionally take and it was not Tejada's stuff since it was tested and came up clear.

If, as he claimed, the B-12 he got from Tejada was possibly tainted, he wouldn't have known. And considering that the B-12 came from a supplier in Central America, which I'm sure doesn't have the quality controls in place that we have in this country, who knows whether or not a particular vial was tainted with steroids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. The type of steroid found in Palmeiro is NOT something that could just get in your supplements or something. Its also something that takes a long time to clear your system and is nearly impossible to conceal. This is something you'd have to intentionally take and it was not Tejada's stuff since it was tested and came up clear.

Stanolozol is sold in the DR in B12 injections and Palmeiro was tested negative 3 weeks after he tested positive initially, so it doesn't take that long to work it's way out of your system. And the B12 Tejada gave the commisson was a sample of what he claimed to be using. It wasn't necessarily what he gave Palmeiro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grimsely flat out accuses Gibby, Roberts and Tejada of using anabolic steroids.

Now, I hate to use the "never failed a test" thing, but they have never failed a test. Their numbers have remained fairly consistent, I attest Roberts HRs to assured/ more playing time - even then he only hit 10 MORE, its not like he sueddenly hit 50 HRs. Their bodies have not changed visably over the past few years that make one think steroids, and well they haven't failed any tests.

Its like this. Say someone gets shot, and someone accuses you of shooting him. But you don't own a gun. Now you could have gotten a gun from somewhere else, you could have hidden the gun, a million and one things but there is no way to link you to a gun.

Thats kind of what we got going on here. The only strike against these guys is their name has been named. It is a damning accusation, but until they fail a test, or admit to it, that is all it is - an accusation.

Bonds' situation is different as he has some more viasble evidence going against him, he has admitted to using steroids and there are multiple accusations from different sources. When Palmeiro named Miguel, it was an accusation it was in response to the question: "what could you have taken that could have caused this result."

Bottom line is this, these guys are all stand-up guys. They have given us no reason not to believe them. And until there is actual physical evidence, or a cooberating witness or two I throw my lot in with the O's.

PS - I guess I owe Alev and apology, but I still feel the way you went about presenting your information was a tad wrong - and then you simply vanished from the forum afterwards. But sorry.

Also, if they we truly had 3 everyday players on perfromance enhancing drugs, you would think our records would have been better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If, as he claimed, the B-12 he got from Tejada was possibly tainted, he wouldn't have known. And considering that the B-12 came from a supplier in Central America, which I'm sure doesn't have the quality controls in place that we have in this country, who knows whether or not a particular vial was tainted with steroids.

That is a serious consideration as to what could have happened. I mean that would be horrible for a contaminated vial, even Miggy didn't know, ends one man's HOF career.

God that would be horrible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully whoever wrote the articles claiming an "anonymous source" will be forced to reveal it eventually. It is only fair that whoever leaks needs to have the proof and be forced to divulge it. Otherwise you have 5 guilty named and no proof to either convict or clear them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was listening to a Fox Sports Radio broadcast (sorry, can't remember who it was). They put the teams into tiers. The O's were in the top tier along with the Yankees, Dodgers and Phillies. I don't know how long it's been that during the season, someone would have called us top tier. And to think, this is happening with two of our starters out for the year and Bradish and Kremer have spent time on the IL. We are doing this with Hays, Mullins, Urias and Santander starting the season on an extreme slump. We have done this with Mateo starting almost every day (which most people thought would be a horrible thing). We have done this with a bullpen that has been very inconsistent. Imagine if we get some of this stuff fixed and some people back to just playing to their career averages. 
    • I'm not sure what we are doing with Vieira. I figured the trade was about the prospect and they had to take him and his salary to make it happen. I expected him to be DFA right away and they would try to send him to the minors to work on him. 
    • What would differentiate them? 
    • Btw, in the 4 game series against the Jays last year (July 31-Aug. 3rd), it is insane that Mountcastle hit for an .846(!) avg with an OPS of 1.932!  
    • Vieira doesn’t have options.  
    • May 2024 This month, two non-prospects were obvious choices for MiL Plsyer and Pitcher of the Month: Player of the Month 28-year old Daniel Johnson led the org in SLG, OPS, HR (tie) and RBI.  He hit .350/.439/.725 with 6 HR and 23 RBI pm In the prospect division, I’m going with 19-year old Leandro Arias, .333/.400/.667 with 3 HR and 13 RBI in 16 games.   Honorable mentions to Ellis Cuevas at .992 OPS, Heston Kjerstad .964 with 14 RBI in 16 games after returning to the minors, and Stiven Acevedo at .953.   Pitcher of the Month In between stinking up the major leagues, 27-year old Jonathan Heasley pitched 16 scoreless innings with an 0.813 WHIP. In the prospect division, 21-year old Edgar Portes pitched to an 0.42 ERA in 20.2 innings, with an 0.919 WHIP and 11.8 K/9.   Honorable mentions: Eccel Correa 0.96 ERA in 18.2 IP, and Trey Gibson with a 1.76 ERA, 1.044 WHIP, and 15.3 K/9 in 15.1 IP.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...