Jump to content

Sun:Grimsley names 3 O's in banned drug case


TWpj

Recommended Posts

With that example I was simply referring to the guys who have been caught to date and given lame excuses, not to the players mentioned by Grimsley.

Tejada has been mentioned supposedly by Canseco, Raffy, and now Grimsley.

I am sure it is just a coincidence. :rolleyes:

As far as Gibbons and Roberts- of course NOT, I am sure they have NEVER touched the stuff. After all, they are ORIOLES. :rolleyes:

Pettitte and Clemens- isn't there a connection with Grimsley (a trainer ?) ? I am sure that is just a coincidence too.

The only players to ever use steroids in MLB history are McGwire, Caminiti, and Segui. :rolleyes: And Bonds, but only accidentily. He was "tricked" by his evil trainer. Barry thought it was flaxseed oil that he was rubbing into his skin on a regular basis.

Dude you want to be bitter and condescending fine. Maybe these guys have done stuff, but maybe they haven't. There is no other evidence and in America you're innocent until proven guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You have no idea what evidence they have.

There could be a paper trail of shipments from a supplier (Balco ?), dealers, personal trainers, witnesses, etc....

Who knows ?

We would have heard about it since June. But your right. Who knows? I think that's the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude you want to be bitter and condescending fine. Maybe these guys have done stuff, but maybe they haven't. There is no other evidence and in America you're innocent until proven guilty.

This is true, but he does bring up a good point.

Look, I laughed at Canseco, too. I thought he was full of crap...turns out, maybe he wasn't.

Grimsley? Crappy journeyman pitcher...blah, no credibility there, right? Well, Segui isn't making it hard to say the affadavit isn't credible. I keep saying this and no one acknowledges it.

Yeah, SJ, you are innocent until proven guilty, but theres a reason to be suspicious. And honestly, those reasons are a lot more believable than believing the players saying they're clean. Where have we heard that before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, you were.

I'm not going to bail, but I'm not going to give them the benefit of the doubt just because they play for my favorite team.

I hope they're not guilty, I hope this affadavit means nothing, but I can't ignore the implications. Especially when Grimsley named Segui and Segui came out and said its true. If Grimsley is right about one of the names he has in there...that doesn't make me feel more confident.

All I'll say is if they are found guilty, I won't be surprised. That goes for EVERYONE in MLB. I think it's that bad and I think this is just the tip of the iceberg.

I won't be surprised, but notice im not saying anything about Clemens or Pettite either, thos guys have given me no reason not to believe them either. I don't even really like Clemens, but he should be treates like everyone else. If they want to do anything about these guys, investigate them, go deep. If it is found that they have done steroids, or not, deal with it then with appropriate action.

But don't just throw their names out and have no other investigation. I mean these names have been with the feds for almost the entire year and there has been no investigation of these guys other than perhaps a cursory look, that we know about.

Let there be a serious investigation of all 5 guys. Until then this is just an unsubstansiated claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't be surprised, but notice im not saying anything about Clemens or Pettite either, thos guys have given me no reason not to believe them either. I don't even really like Clemens, but he should be treates like everyone else. If they want to do anything about these guys, investigate them, go deep. If it is found that they have done steroids, or not, deal with it then with appropriate action.

But don't just throw their names out and have no other investigation. I mean these names have been with the feds for almost the entire year and there has been no investigation of these guys other than perhaps a cursory look, that we know about.

Let there be a serious investigation of all 5 guys. Until then this is just an unsubstansiated claim.

I don't know about the process, but I'm imagining it's going to take awhile for this thing to get started. I'm sure they also were waiting for the offseason so the players couldn't hide behind their schedule.

This is going to take a looooooooooong time....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about the process, but I'm imagining it's going to take awhile for this thing to get started. I'm sure they also were waiting for the offseason so the players couldn't hide behind their schedule.

This is going to take a looooooooooong time....

The season didn't stop them for going after Grimsely or their continuing investigation of Bonds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not any more.:mad:

Of course you are innocent until proven guilty....in a court of law.

But, not in the court of public opinion.

The chickens are coming home to roost.

MLBPA refused to bargain on this issue (Testing) initially and later rebuffed real meaningful testing. They hid behind a phony "privacy" issue.

Only when public pressure mounted to the point that their credibility was at stake, Congress inquired, and some of his own union finally said enough- did Fehr relent and agree to stricter testing.

They could have nipped this in the bud years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is true, but he does bring up a good point.

Look, I laughed at Canseco, too. I thought he was full of crap...turns out, maybe he wasn't.

Grimsley? Crappy journeyman pitcher...blah, no credibility there, right? Well, Segui isn't making it hard to say the affadavit isn't credible. I keep saying this and no one acknowledges it.

Yeah, SJ, you are innocent until proven guilty, but theres a reason to be suspicious. And honestly, those reasons are a lot more believable than believing the players saying they're clean. Where have we heard that before?

"There's another way to phrase that and that is that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It is basically saying the same thing in a different way. Simply because you do not have evidence that something does exist does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn't exist."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...in America you're innocent until proven guilty.
Only in a court of law. It doesn't mean these guys didn't do it. Even if a court found them innocent, it doesn't mean they didn't do it. (a good example is the OJ case)

The Grimsley trade was sure a bad idea, wasn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The season didn't stop them for going after Grimsely or their continuing investigation of Bonds.

He said a lot of reporters have known about this for months. You don't think they looked into it to try to get some juicey dirt. They've had since June and haven't come up with anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The season didn't stop them for going after Grimsely or their continuing investigation of Bonds.

Good point.

However, Grimsley was busted by the Feds on his shipment of illegal stuff and Bonds is being investigated by the IRS for tax evasion which seems to be a totally different beast. The Bonds investigation for roids has cooled this season...at least, nothing has been made publicly known.

It's gonna get really thick this offseason, just wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you are innocent until proven guilty....in a court of law.

But, not in the court of public opinion.

The chickens are coming home to roost.

MLBPA refused to bargain on this issue (Testing) initially and later rebuffed real meaningful testing. They hid behind a phony "privacy" issue.

Only when public pressure mounted to the point that their credibility was at stake, Congress inquired, and some of his own union finally said enough- did Fehr relent and agree to stricter testing.

They could have nipped this in the bud years ago.

Hey! Quit jacking my cliche...

Only one Malcolm X impersonation per day ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wish I had it in me to proudly defend these guys and wholeheartedly say that I think Grimsely is lying. Good LORD, do I hope they are innocent but... I just don't know. It's very painful to all of a sudden go from being so proud to have these guys represent me and my city and my team to not being able to honestly say I am sure they didn't cheat. 24 hrs before this story broke, I was a one-woman Orioles cheering section in Fenway Park. Proudly wearing a Roberts jersey and celebrating Miggy's new hits record...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
    • The fact that they put this on the 1991 Donruss, perhaps the ultimate peak of the junk wax era, makes this even funnier to me.  If toilet paper ever shot up in price I wouldn't care because I've got heaps of '91 Donruss floating around. This is very true, which makes me thinks he'll get claimed somewhere else.
    • It's like the ghost of Chris Davis found him and has taken over his body.   I know bat speed isn't everything, but with the bat speed info that dropped, I took a look.  His average is 70.9 which isn't terribly slow, it's actually pretty average.   For whatever reason, he just can't square anything up.  I hope he fixes it but it's really tough to watch right now.
    • Just a few years ago this was the type of guy we would of claimed.  
    • I believe that the bad umpiring in the major leagues is one of the reason s why the jump from AAA to the majors gap seems larger than ever.
    • I agree there are some.  Saquon was power cleaning 400 back at PSU.  I just disagree with the phrasing of regularly. I'm big into Olympic weightlifting where squat numbers are followed closely and I know the time and effort required to put 4 plates on each side of a bar.      
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...