Jump to content

Buster Olney on Hamilton to Baltimore


luismatos4prez

Recommended Posts

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/06/olney-on-hamels-hamilton-quentin.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

One general manager suggested the Orioles could become aggressive bidders for Hamilton, who will likely command an annual salary of $20MM-plus. "But [at that price] I don't think he's got a lot of places to go," the GM told Olney.

I'm not saying do it or don't. But I am saying that Josh Hamilton is the most talented pure hitter I've ever seen and I never get tired of watching him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/06/olney-on-hamels-hamilton-quentin.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

I'm not saying do it or don't. But I am saying that Josh Hamilton is the most talented pure hitter I've ever seen and I never get tired of watching him.

Hamilton just turned 31 a few weeks ago. He can still play LF decently for now, but over the length of a FA contract, he would likely become a DH.

Edit: It certainly didn't hurt our cause when the fans gave him a standing ovation on his 4 HR/18 TB night. Can only help his impression of us. Props to those who were there and represented Baltimore so well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/06/olney-on-hamels-hamilton-quentin.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

I'm not saying do it or don't. But I am saying that Josh Hamilton is the most talented pure hitter I've ever seen and I never get tired of watching him.

I'd give him 7/$154M with some big clause if he falls off the wagon. LF'er for 4-5yrs, would think he had the skill set to play 1b thereafter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be such an awful signing, but, it doesn't surprise me given the general mentality of this board to pay a guy when he is playing above his head for a month or two. We've already taken on one huge unwarranted OF contract this season, I suppose we could work on sinking the next 14 years if we pull another? The only way you even consider this is if the O's are true contenders with a dynamic, young, inexpensive core. (We aren't yet -- I still think it is much more likely we'll be under .500 at the end of the year than above it given our talent level)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be such an awful signing, but, it doesn't surprise me given the general mentality of this board to pay a guy when he is playing above his head for a month or two. We've already taken on one huge unwarranted OF contract this season, I suppose we could work on sinking the next 14 years if we pull another? The only way you even consider this is if the O's are true contenders with a dynamic, young, inexpensive core. (We aren't yet -- I still think it is much more likely we'll be under .500 at the end of the year than above it given our talent level)

I take exception to two of your points. First: The idea that Josh Hamilton is "playing above his head for a month or two." He hit .359 with 32 HR and 100 RBI in 2010 while missing almost 30 games, and won an MVP. Last year he hit .294 with 25 HR and 94 HR while missing 40 games. His averages .311 over his career, and a .924 OPS. He's not "playing over his head." This is who he is.

Also, I'm not going to get into another debate about Adam Jones' contract, but suffice it to say that he would've gotten dramatically more in the open market than he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree RZ. I believe his problem is a sickness. I would not want him to be banned for life. But maybe MLB could do that. I dont know. But he wont be on the O's anyway. Goodness he is one hell of a player. I also dont believe the Rangers will ever lose him to FA. He is too valuable for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I would prefer not to do a 7 year deal. But my point is if not Burnes than who? How long are we going to be able to trade for 1/2 year rental types (like he currently is)?  If we allow Burnes to walk in FA, then we are going to have to sign someone (who won’t be as good). OR trade one of our top level prospects for a Luzardo or maybe one of the Mariners young controllable starters. If the Reed Sox were allowed sign a Burnes and we do nothing or go with some kind of patchwork Kyle Gibson signing, they would be real close to catching up to us.
    • Obviously, the years/dollars matter in regard to Burnes. I can see where Burnes might be the next in line to lay claim to the Verlander/Scherzer crown as one of the preeminent power pitchers of his time...that is to say he goes through his 30s and comes out the other side as one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball for a decade or longer.  He's been durable, he seems to prepare himself in the way that those guys do and I think he will last.  Of course, it's not my money. I don't know how the new ownership group will approach free agency and quite frankly, I'm not sure if I really care at the moment.  I'm sure I'll care in the offseason, though. I will say, I'd really like to see the new ownership spend to lock up the talent we already have before spending on free agency.   
    • Completely agree. Not sure what the analytics would say, but to me (from TV vantage point), Kremer’s best stuff comes by two pairings: (A) 4 seam 95mph at top of zone and curveball, and (B) splitter and 2 seamer at bottom of the zone.  Both probably tunnel in the same way to the batters.  And his cutter should be reserved only for jamming lefties on their hands, bc he hangs far too many meatballs against righties. 
    • How was the weather?  My recollection was that he didn’t have a feel for it that game and had trouble locating either for a strike or close enough to get a chase.
    • We can just say impact = well above replacement level. Kremer is a great guy to have as our #5 as he would have been on Opening Day if not for the aforementioned starter injuries. I'm sure no one really thought Bradish would be AL Cy Young-4 in his second year in the MLB. That's a fantastic hit by Elias. That and getting Gunnar in the 2nd may be the most impressive things Elias has done?  To answer your question, no I probably didn't think much of Bradish when we got him as an A Ball pitcher. Would I have bet he individually would be elite? No. But would I bet there'd be an elite pitcher in all the pitching prospects we got back for Manny Machado, Zach Britton, Jonathan Schoop, Kevin Gausman, Darren O'Day, Dylan Bundy, Jonathan Villar, Miguel Castro, Jose Iglesias, Cole Susler, Tanner Scott? Well I'd hope so. Out of them we got Bradish, Kremer, and Tate (1 elite SP, 1 decent SP, 1 reliever and a bunch of names we've forgotten). I'll take it. We'll see what we get any SP's out of the Trey Mancini and Jorge Lopez hauls.  Now we're in a different position where we aren't selling off assets to get back dart throws. At this point, our conversation will get circular but it will take value in prospects or value in dollars or some combination of both to get more elite talent in the rotation. Don't expect to give middle tier contracts out and get back elite level performance. And I don't think we'll be able to maintain this ridiculous level our farm system is at forever. And we won't be able to have the luxury of sending off 12 years of Joey Ortiz and DL Hall type players for 1 year rentals every year.     
    • I actually think you hit on it.   The more realistic extension candidates are Cowser, Westburg, Kjerstad, Mayo, and Basallo.
    • I like it. Tomorrow will be the intersting one. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...