Jump to content

Buster Olney on Hamilton to Baltimore


luismatos4prez

Recommended Posts

Hamilton just turned 31 a few weeks ago. He can still play LF decently for now, but over the length of a FA contract, he would likely become a DH.

Edit: It certainly didn't hurt our cause when the fans gave him a standing ovation on his 4 HR/18 TB night. Can only help his impression of us. Props to those who were there and represented Baltimore so well.

I didn't realize he was so old. "old..." :) I'll preface this by saying I LOVE the flexibility Buck has right now with the DH. But if it meant signing Hamilton and locking him (eventually) into the DH spot, I'd take that in a heartbeat.

As with all FA discussions, I don't much care about the money. I think PA will put up the money if convinced. It's the years I worry about. I wouldn't give him more than 5 years guaranteed. Line in the sand. Club options beyond that, or incentivized options based on REAL production in the last years of the deal.

Overall... GET him! Put up or put up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I did. But I don't recognize his records and I definitely don't consider him "pure". Same goes for all the other cheaters. And it's sad because he easily had the talent to be a first ballot HOFer without that crap. As far as I'm concerned Hank Aaron and Roger Maris are the career and single season home run kings respectively.

Hamilton is another story. He's made some awful mistakes, but he never cheated the game of baseball. Only himself and his family.

There is a lot of evidence that suggests Aaron was using steroids. It is a certainty that many of his teammates were using them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the O's should go all in for Hamilton. The O's haven't had a real star like him in ages. Ripken was our last star player. Isn't Hamilton an above average defender? I'm not sure why everyone already has him pencilled in at DH. Wasn't he playing CF earlier in the year. Offer him a 6 year deal/140 mill with a couple of options. I would rather have Hamilton than Pujols starting this year, especially considering Hamilton won't get near the years Pujols will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Bonds wouldn't have hit half the home runs he did without roids. Just look at the before and after photos.

You mean the before 1998 and after 1998 photos of his page in the Baseball Encyclopedia? He had 411 homers before anyone really thinks he started using anything. Even if he was 100% clean I think he's at least a 500-homer guy, probably 600.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonds would have been (or is I guess you should say) one of the best players of all time without ever using steroids. The story I read was he went to Griffey Jr. after the '98 season and discussed how they were getting jipped with McGwire and Sosa roiding up and taking the spotlight and all the records that they should have. Griffey Jr. didn't want to get involved with the stuff, Bonds of course did. And the rest is history.

Back to Hamilton, I can't really decide if I would shell out the necessary dough to get him. It's not my money, but I don't want Hamilton to decline and spend time on the DL and that not allow us to sign someone else. Or even worse, one of our own.

EDIT: the alleged conversation was mentioned in Jeff Pearlmans "Love Me, Hate Me, Barry Bonds and the Making of an Antihero". Attached is a news article on it.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1683&dat=20060315&id=V6kaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=PEUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=1621,3736652

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Bonds wouldn't have hit half the home runs he did without roids. Just look at the before and after photos.

This is a fairly ridiculous statement, Johnny. Barry Bonds was plenty strong enough to hit home runs without steroids. Steroids do not help a hitter in being able to hit a baseball, you either can, or you can't. Maybe Bonds wouldn't have put so many balls in the harbor, but they still would have gone out of the park. Mark McGuire hit 49 HR's in his rookie season, he was a string bean. Bonds would have hit a ton of HR's if he never took a steroid. He could flat out hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not "pure", but you have to admit a pure hitter. A FORCE in the batter's box.

Best I have ever seen. I remember in 2002 he would get maybe 2 pitches a night to hit and he would crush one of them.

The steroid use doesn't bother me much since I came to the conclusion years ago that if cyclists are using all this crap then pretty much every baseball/football/basketball player is as well. Other sports as well, like golf, if a PGA player can take something and get 15 yards on his drive you think he isn't going to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you point me to any? Skeptical but curious.

I have always found the odd power spike that 1973 Braves enjoyed to be questionable.

Also, if Aaron's career numbers were transported into the steroid era he would be under as much suspicion as Bagwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always found the odd power spike that 1973 Braves enjoyed to be questionable.

Also, if Aaron's career numbers were transported into the steroid era he would be under as much suspicion as Bagwell.

I kind of thought this was silly, but did a bit of research and am intrigued.

1971-1978 - Tom House

House said that he used steroids during his eight-year Major League career, though he wasn't specific about which years. House estimated that "six or seven pitchers on every staff were fiddling with steroids or hGH" while he was playing.

Tom House also says that steroids were rampant in the 1960's. This comment represents the earliest date that steroids were implicated in baseball. While this time-frame seems reasonable, House was still in the minor leagues at that time.

http://thesteroidera.blogspot.com/2006/08/earliest-accounts-of-steroids-and-hgh.html

Guess who Tom House played for? You got it, the Atlanta Braves from 1971 -1975. Aaron also was noticeably bigger laterin his career. Sure part of that was filling out and weight gain, but anything is possible

Here's more interesting stuff especially for a guy that has been so outspoken against those that used.

http://grg51.typepad.com/steroid_nation/2007/02/hammerin_hank_a.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of thought this was silly, but did a bit of research and am intrigued.

1971-1978 - Tom House

House said that he used steroids during his eight-year Major League career, though he wasn't specific about which years. House estimated that "six or seven pitchers on every staff were fiddling with steroids or hGH" while he was playing.

Tom House also says that steroids were rampant in the 1960's. This comment represents the earliest date that steroids were implicated in baseball. While this time-frame seems reasonable, House was still in the minor leagues at that time.

http://thesteroidera.blogspot.com/2006/08/earliest-accounts-of-steroids-and-hgh.html

Guess who Tom House played for? You got it, the Atlanta Braves from 1971 -1975. Aaron also was noticeably bigger laterin his career. Sure part of that was filling out and weight gain, but anything is possible

Here's more interesting stuff especially for a guy that has been so outspoken against those that used.

http://grg51.typepad.com/steroid_nation/2007/02/hammerin_hank_a.html

Thank you, rep earned and given. I have finals next week and I can hardly find the time to scratch my ear.

Admittedly, the evidence is circumstantial. But, for anyone who is in a steroid laced environment, to put up those kinds of numbers at that stage of life being considered "pure" is a stretch.

As Can-of-Corn said: Bagwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since when are the Orioles big bidder for free agents?

Not my money so I'm in favor of it, Hamilton could DH down the road and play a solid LF or 1B for now, which would basically drop Nick Johnson from the roster and take playing time from Riemold and Davis. Replacing Johnson's ABs with Hamiltons would probably be worth 4 wins or so already this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
    • By the way, something they absolutely need to legislate is the size of the oven mitt. I forget who it was, one of these guys had one that was basically giving him 18 inch fingers.
    • You can also slide to the side of the bag and reach back... I'd like to see data both on safety and success rates for each one before making a call.  Either way, I agree, a team probably shouldn't on their own put themselves at a competitive disadvantage by voluntarily imposing rules on itself. So if this is a problem, then the proper way to deal with it would be to change the rules like they have with catcher's interference (which I support). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...