Jump to content

Not getting Blanton should concern fans


Dark Helmet

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The Orioles were interested in him if he was available on the cheap. The Phillies weren't willing to pick up enough $$$$ that made the Orioles comfortable. This had nothing to do with Angelos or the players involved. the Orioles weren't going to be giving up anyone of value. This all came down to not wanting to pay for Blanton's contract. Draw your own conclusions.
In short, if for whatever reason Duquette thought Blanton was worth $3M, would Angelos have given it to him to spend?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In short, if for whatever reason Duquette thought Blanton was worth $3M, would Angelos have given it to him to spend?

According to this poster from another site, yes.

Contrary to belief, it wasn't the money thing today, it was the prospect cost (they could have had Blanton anytime if they wanted him, but were not giving up Schoop, Delmonico or Rodgriguez).

If they are in the hunt 8/30, maybe even sooner, you might see them take on the money since it would be a shot in the arm to the offense.

The last part was referencing Soriano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to this poster from another site, yes.
Quote Originally Posted by allstar1579

Contrary to belief, it wasn't the money thing today, it was the prospect cost (they could have had Blanton anytime if they wanted him, but were not giving up Schoop, Delmonico or Rodgriguez).

WADR to whatever source he may have, I have a hard time believing that Philly wouldn't have gone for a lower-level prospect in exchange for salary relief.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WADR to whatever source he may have, I have a hard time believing that Philly wouldn't have gone for a lower-level prospect in exchange for salary relief.

Pente said the same thing. Said Angelos was not involved.

Ugh, why do I even give a rat's arse? Never mind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WADR to whatever source he may have, I have a hard time believing that Philly wouldn't have gone for a lower-level prospect in exchange for salary relief.

I'd like to submit this into evidence..

Believe it. O's were being aggressive on Blanton so they thought they could play hardball, knowing they'd be able to move him in August if not. PHI offered to pay some of the salary and thought they could get a bigger prospect by doing it. Don't blame DD for holding steady on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to submit this into evidence..
Originally Posted by allstar1579 PHI offered to pay some of the salary and thought they could get a bigger prospect by doing it.

and enter this as well

The Phillies weren't willing to pick up enough $$$$ that made the Orioles comfortable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blanton isn't worth any serious money and I cant think you believe otherwise. Especially if they're asking for players in return as well.

For the record, I don't care that we missed out on Joe flippin' Blanton. I have to assume that when Tony said, "the Orioles were interested in him if he was available on the cheap," the bargain hunter was Duquette acting on his own. When people say, "it wasn't Angelos," one could also read in to that he wasn't consulted on the deal, so obviously he didn't block it. What I was trying to find out was what kind of financial leverage Duquette had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, I don't care that we missed out on Joe flippin' Blanton. I have to assume that when Tony said, "the Orioles were interested in him if he was available on the cheap," the bargain hunter was Duquette acting on his own. What I was trying to find out was what kind of financial leverage Duquette had.

Gotchya. I'd almost think he didn't want to pay much for Blanton as he has ideas of adding some offensive help that may require some contract absorption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't disagree more. Blanton is the type of move we would have seen in the past. This team is out playing anyone's expectations. They're doing without any flashy off-season pickups. They're doing it as a team. I do not see ANYTHING wrong with DD not wanting to pay $3M to Joe Blanton for a few months of service here. That $3M can go toward another piece in the off season. Opening up the checkbook and signing Adam Jones long term was a statement. I, as well as a lot of other O's fans, can't wait to see what happens in the off season following the performance of this surprise team.

Thats fine. I respect your opinion. Im curious to see what this offseason brings also. I dont expect much however. We're not signing Grienke or Hamilton. Other than that, not alot that can be a game changer. We might still get in on Headley. But then it gets into the same ol same ol...Guy A will want too much money for too many years, or guy b will cost too much prospect wise. And in the end, we will wind up signing Juan Pierre and Placido Polanco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may not have had much chance to do anything WITH Blanton, but we certainly stand no chance without him.

Our pitching staff isn't good or deep enough and our team didn't improve an inch while all the other contenders around us got better.

So we are still playing for the future ehhh? Uhhh ok, why the hell did we trade for Thome then????? Makes no damn sense at all.

The Orioles will always be destined to fail it seems. Ho hum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
    • Postgame Pedro Martinez and Dusty Baker critiquing Clase tripling up on his weaker pitch before the Carpenter heroics. 78% cutters on the season for Clase - the key PA went cutter-cutter-cutter-slider-slider-slider.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...