Jump to content

Os acquire Saunders.


gallden

Recommended Posts

Maybe you missed the Guthrie for Hammel + Lindstrom trade with the Rockies?

Maybe you missed all the news coverage and fan reaction at the time of the Guthrie for Hammel + Lindstron trade? No one was jumping up and down at the time, everyone was trying to convince themselves that it wasn't so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 287
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm very surprised to see the amount of people who disagree with this trade. Lindstrom was doing well, but he clearly wasn't an indispensable part of the bullpen's success. Starting pitching, however, really needs the support and structure of a veteran BOR starter.

I'm guessing part of the problem is that Saunders is something of an unknown quantity to most of us. I don't know how I feel about this, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saunders has consistently thrown 6/7 innings giving up 2/3 runs except for 3 starts this year. If you take out those 3 starts he has a 3.05 ERA. He'll probably do what Gonzo is doing for us now, although he may have 1 bad start where he goes Tommy Hunter on us. I'd take 5/6 quality starts with 1 bad one though...

You can't just take away starts. You can do that with every single pitcher in baseball.

You also have to factor in the NL. Although, with that said, Chase Field is a much better hitter's park than Camden Yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you missed all the news coverage and fan reaction at the time of the Guthrie for Hammel + Lindstron trade? No one was jumping up and down at the time, everyone was trying to convince themselves that it wasn't so bad.

You said clearly benefitted. There is no doubt we benefitted from that trade. Trades are rarely won the day they're made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You said clearly benefitted. There is no doubt we benefitted from that trade. Trades are rarely won the day they're made.

I didn't say we didnt benefit. If you read my original post, I said I wish there was one trade where we could look at it at face value on day one and say, this was a smart trade. Some have worked out in the long run, but there hasn't been one that i felt good about when it was first made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Arrieta thrives in the bullpen then this move does not hurt. I am just not confident that he will.

I have never forgotten that Arrieta's pro debut was in the Arizona Fall League, and he was unscored upon as a reliever for the whole AFL campaign. I think he can be great in the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And when Hammel comes back we have Hammel, Chen, Gonzo, Saunders, Tillman (or maybe Britton/Johnson). Those are 4 pretty reliable guys and Tillman is either lights out or he could struggle. Makes our rotation much deeper and steadier.

I'd much rather start Britton or Johnson than Saunders, who numbers aren't good in the NL. And anything that brings Arietta back to the bigs is a disappiontment. Not a good decision by the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't just take away starts. You can do that with every single pitcher in baseball.

You also have to factor in the NL. Although, with that said, Chase Field is a much better hitter's park than Camden Yards.

I know. That's why I said he may go Tommy Hunter on us for 1 start, but his season suggests the other 5/6 starts he'll throw 6/7 inning allowing only 2/3 runs. I did take away starts, but only to show that he can blow up maybe once every 8 starts or so, but for the most part he's a very solid starter, and will help us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Saunders is strictly used for the pen, which he may, i'm not sure I like this deal. Lindstrom was fine, Saunders has some experience, but has been hit hard. I hope the O's arent looking to

move either Britton or Johnson out of the rotation. Both have been excellent in their last starts. Perhaps this is a money dump or a move to get some kind of security and depth in case of a

faltering pitcher or in case Hammel doesnt come back shining.I dont know that I like this deal. But then, I didnt like the Hammel deal either.

Well said, put Saunders in the BP and demote Arrieta when he reports from AZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Saunders is strictly used for the pen, which he may, i'm not sure I like this deal. Lindstrom was fine, Saunders has some experience, but has been hit hard. I hope the O's arent looking to

move either Britton or Johnson out of the rotation. Both have been excellent in their last starts. Perhaps this is a money dump or a move to get some kind of security and depth in case of a

faltering pitcher or in case Hammel doesnt come back shining.I dont know that I like this deal. But then, I didnt like the Hammel deal either.

Rosters are expanding very soon and I think, maybe, Buck would like to keep Chen and Gonzo as fresh as possible. I think Buck and Duq think by adding another starter who is just as qualified, if not more then many of the other options in the rotation will keep things lively. I tend to think that Buck will keep running Johnson and Britton out there IF they keep performing well. Saunders has a bit more of a track record however and IMHO it is good to have the depth. Lindstrom did pretty well in his time here but I, personally do not think we will miss him down the stretch, especially with rosters expanding. Now, if we make the postseason could we miss Lindstrom? Perhaps, but I think that Arrieta will fill his role nicely. We don't know what we will get from Saunders but I think it is worth a shot, see what sticks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't really care one way or the other but as of now I'm slightly in favor of the trade. Especially with rosters expanding, we're fine as far as bullpen depth goes and no one here really knows what the statuses of Hammel and Chen are. Maybe Buck plans on going to a 6-man rotation? Who knows? Saunders isn't anything special, but we're going to be awful glad to have him if Hammel has a set back or Tillman gets injured or Gonzo becomes ineffective. He's insurance, nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...