Jump to content

Cubbies want Tejada???


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm not sure.

I like Hill. Hate Izturis. I'd actually insist that Izturis not be in the deal and we could just sign Alex Gonzalez.

Prior is the wildcard here. He could either be one of the best pitchers in the AL, or a guy who cna make 15 starts a year.

I like that trade a lot more than Santana and Aybar. In the end, I'd probably roll the dice and make the move, because Hill will likely be at least a #3 and Prior could be a #1 if he can ever stay healthy. A rotation next season of Bedard, Prior, Hill, Loewen, and Cabrera would be one of the most talented - if not effective - in baseball, and Bedard would be the grandfather of the rotation at 28 years old. You could then trade Benson for Ensberg or Burrell and have Penn in Norfolk or the bullpen to step in if/when Prior misses some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You like that trade more than Santana Aybar???? Are you nuts?

Santana 22-23 Years old top of the rotation guy. Aybar is a defensive beast showing good speed, contact, Possible leadoff hitter there, in the mold of Jose Reyes with a bit less pop.

You take that Angels deal in your sleep, at the mall, anywhere you can get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Straight up I would say this is an iffy trade to make. As part of a multi team deal, I would say this fits in very well. Throw in the Rangers and/or Angels and a lot of interesting things could happen. If the Orioles can land Hill or Ervin Santana, along with Tex and Izturis, things would be SWEET!

Tex more or less replaces Tejada's offensive production and fills hole at 1B.

Izturis is a defensive upgrade at SS and offensively is even or maybe an upgrade over Millar at 1B who's spot he would take in the lineup.

Santana or Hill are a quality ML ready SP that fills out the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure.

I like Hill. Hate Izturis. I'd actually insist that Izturis not be in the deal and we could just sign Alex Gonzalez.

Prior is the wildcard here. He could either be one of the best pitchers in the AL, or a guy who cna make 15 starts a year.

I like that trade a lot more than Santana and Aybar. In the end, I'd probably roll the dice and make the move, because Hill will likely be at least a #3 and Prior could be a #1 if he can ever stay healthy. A rotation next season of Bedard, Prior, Hill, Loewen, and Cabrera would be one of the most talented - if not effective - in baseball, and Bedard would be the grandfather of the rotation at 28 years old. You could then trade Benson for Ensberg or Burrell and have Penn in Norfolk or the bullpen to step in if/when Prior misses some time.

Are any of Prior's injuries related to his pitching arm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you guys see the hangout front page quoting an article talking about Hill, Prior and Izturis for Tejada????

Would you guys take that trade?

I'd think about it, but I'd probably decline. Prior is just too big a risk, and Hill, while he should be good, doesn't make up for that. Substitute Zambrano for Prior and Hill and we're definitely in business, but I doubt the Cubs do that.

Although Mackus's point about Prior and Hill in our rotation is an intriguing one. If we pick up these two guys we can deal for an Ensberg-type hitter while still having a little bit of depth (Rodrigo, Penn, Burres if we can keep him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You like that trade more than Santana Aybar???? Are you nuts?

Santana 22-23 Years old top of the rotation guy. Aybar is a defensive beast showing good speed, contact, Possible leadoff hitter there, in the mold of Jose Reyes with a bit less pop.

You take that Angels deal in your sleep, at the mall, anywhere you can get it.

Comapring Aybar to Jose Reyes is silly. I don't know how someone who's making 32 errors in 135 games in 2005 and 22 in only 83 games this season a "defensive beast". Maybe the reports are he will be a plus defender, but he certainly isn't yet. And with OPS under .800 each of the last two seasons in the PCL (a hitters league) he's not going to be anything more than an average hitter.

And Santana is no sure thing to be a top of the rotation guy. His struggles away from anaheim really worry me (6+ ERA). I like him a lot, but him alone is not enough for Tejada, and Aybar really isn't that impressive to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all comes down to Prior. We could get Hill and Prior, put them with Bedard, Loewen and DCab and then look to deal Benson and Penn and get a good young SS, like Aybar and a young first baseman.

So, we could always get these guys in other deals.

But again, how healthy is Prior?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Hill and Murton for Tejeda and Minor League Pitcher

then sign a SS like Lugo or A.Gonzalez

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/baltimore_orioles/index.html

2007 MLB Free Agents: Luis Gonzalez

When we last checked in with future free agent left fielder Luis Gonzalez, he'd been informed by the D'Backs that they didn't want him back.

Now, Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe has a few interested teams for us:

"Don't feel bad about Luis Gonzalez's Diamondbacks career being over. The Orioles, Tigers, Rangers, and Cubs are already considering him as a DH and/or left fielder for next year."

Word was that Gonzo wanted to stay in the NL, meaning a return to the Cubs might be at the top of the list. The problem? The Cubs already have a left fielder, and he's having a fine age 24 season.

Matt Murton: .294/.359/.438

Luis Gonzalez: .274/.356/.453

Given that Murton is improving and Gonzalez is on the decline, and that Gonzalez will make significantly more money, the signing wouldn't make much sense.

If the Cubs really are interested, that should mean one of two things.

1. They plan on using Murton in center field and letting Juan Pierre go (unlikely but not the worst idea in the world if Murton could somehow pull it off on defense).

2. They are considering trading Murton (possible).

If the Cubs want to make a major trade, say involving Miguel Tejada, Murton could be a coveted player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all comes down to Prior. We could get Hill and Prior, put them with Bedard, Loewen and DCab and then look to deal Benson and Penn and get a good young SS, like Aybar and a young first baseman.

So, we could always get these guys in other deals.

But again, how healthy is Prior?

I only due this trade if Prior is being immediately traded to Texas. They are so desperate for pitching they are more likely to take his health risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I imagine something is going to get worked out with MASN, unless I've missed something - which is possible. I went thru the cord cutting research a while back and posted a thread about finding MASN on some of the streamer packages.  In the end, I decided to bide my time with Xfinity because getting MASN required a full on monthly streaming package from one of DriectTV, Xfinity, YouTube (I think)...  Anyway, that kind of priced me out of changing because I get a bunch of the streaming packages with the Xfinity package.  It was really close and not worth the change, at the time.  I might look into it again when summer comes. It really is sort of crazy to me that there hasn't been a package with local over-the-air broadcast channels and MASN.  I know that doesn't help travelers and out of viewing area fans, but if you combine that with Sling, you could view it anywhere a few seconds behind using the recording feature as you would with Xfinity Stream. You'd also think that MLB, owning the rights to the games and having to get permission from them to do anything with the footage, anyway, that they would just allow the viewing of any game with a top-tier-ish package and cut a check based on viewership to individual clubs.  All we wanna do is watch baseball for godsakes!  lol
    • They definitely appeared to be “activated”!
    • I’m pretty sure when my wife tells me to go to the gym, she is hoping for me to be half as fit as he is.  As far as commenting on another man’s body, I am completely comfortable in my own sexuality and I do indeed wish I had the discipline and work ethic that these athletes do. BUT, it is a lot of work and their full time jobs. I don’t imagine they have wives bitching at them to help clean the kitchen or take out the garbage or why couldn’t you be more like my brother in law? I don’t have a brother in law, but I’m sure you get the point. 😆 Maybe that is the key. If I looked like an athletic kid, my wife would get off my back 
    • Will new ownership step up and  get a Snell or Montgomery, or wait and trade prospects for Cease? Give Snell 3/100 m, or Montgomery 4/100m, time to be bold.
    • I think Gunnar's gold glove caliber-defense is what will make it tough for any other Oriole to be more valuable than him over the next few years. And yes, his combination of offense and defense will put him in the AL MVP discussion if he stays healthy.
    • I'm a cord-cutter, live in Baltimore City, and have used MLB.tv for about 8 years now to watch the O's. Overall, I really like it. But, I think the decision depends more on how you watch TV and personal preferences. Like others have mentioned, there are ways to get around the blackouts. 99% of the time those workarounds have no issues. But, at least once a year, those workarounds temporarily get blocked and you're completely out of luck. There's been more than one occasion where I had a long day at work, couldn't wait to get home to watch the O's and relax, grabbed some beer from the store on the way home, sat down on the couch - and then ..... nope. Out of luck. That being said, I like having MLB.tv because I don't really watch enough TV to justify cable and I travel quite frequently for work, so having O's access anywhere is nice. The biggest perk to me though is it's pretty cool to be able to put on a West Coast game in the background after the O's game while I catch up on emails and whatnot, if you're a night owl like me. I've really enjoyed being able to watch full games of Trout, Ohtani, Kershaw, etc as a night cap. All in all, I think it comes down to personal preference. If you're somebody who only watches the Os and also watches cable or can get a cable bundle that includes Netflix or whatever - I think that probably still makes the most sense. But, if you wanna ditch cable, are okay with some disruptions, or value being able to watch other teams - you'll love MLB.tv.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...