Jump to content

Cubbies want Tejada???


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I wouldn't even think about without an extension.
What makes you think we couldn't extend Zambrano? Esp. with Mora and Hernandez being fellow Venezuelans?

BTW, Zambrano's increased walk rate and worse GB/FB ratio (last year) concern me a little bit. Does anyone know what might be up with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's funny.. you are difinitely digging at the bottom of the barrel to support this argument.... I suppose Bo Jackson can come play for us also, forget the injury, look at his career numbers..

You said there is no evidence that he will be successful...,That is wrong..There is plenty of evidence to support that.

There is no current evidence that he can stay healthy or will be healthy. That is where the evidence is lacking. But his numbers, when healthy, speak for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Medical opinions. If he's structurally sound I think you take the risk because a lot of his problems with the Cubs stemmed from him being one of the most abused pitchers in baseball when he was but a wee child. The O's don't have such a track record, so you'd have to hope more careful handling would fix a lot of that.

On a guy like Prior would Mazzone's program of throwing alot more help or hurt him?

Mazzone has always felt the more you throw, the stronger your arm is. But, he has a history of issues, so would it hurt him?(it didn't hurt Wright)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Cubs are willing to trade Zambrano, don't you all think they would do it for AROD before Tejada?

I would rather have Lackey than Zambrano anyway.

Personally, i don't think i would deal Tejada for Zambrano...With the way the Cubs have abused him, he is a shoulder or arm injury waiting to happen IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Cubs are willing to trade Zambrano, don't you all think they would do it for AROD before Tejada?

I would rather have Lackey than Zambrano anyway.

Personally, i don't think i would deal Tejada for Zambrano...With the way the Cubs have abused him, he is a shoulder or arm injury waiting to happen IMO.

They'd have to give up a lot more for A-Rod than they would for Tejada. A-Rod's owed slightly more money and is a better player, but also don't forget that NYY have far less reason to trade Rodriguez than we do to trade Tejada.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'd have to give up a lot more for A-Rod than they would for Tejada. A-Rod's owed slightly more money and is a better player, but also don't forget that NYY have far less reason to trade Rodriguez than we do to trade Tejada.

Personally i think the Yanks have more reason to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally i think the Yanks have more reason to trade him.
They don't need to clear salary, and he's the best player in the game. Where's the urgency?

I find a lot of this "Yankee fans hate A-Rod" stuff to be absolutely ridiculous. Who effin' cares what MFY fans think? They hated Dave Winfield, too, and he's in the HOF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't need to clear salary, and he's the best player in the game. Where's the urgency?

I find a lot of this "Yankee fans hate A-Rod" stuff to be absolutely ridiculous. Who effin' cares what MFY fans think? They hated Dave Winfield, too, and he's in the HOF.

It's more of a clubhouse thing as well.

Some think it will be addition by subtraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't need to clear salary, and he's the best player in the game. Where's the urgency?

I find a lot of this "Yankee fans hate A-Rod" stuff to be absolutely ridiculous. Who effin' cares what MFY fans think? They hated Dave Winfield, too, and he's in the HOF.

For anybody else, A-Rod is still one of the best players in the game. But for a team built for the postseason, he's a player who doesn't produce in the postseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anybody else, A-Rod is still one of the best players in the game. But for a team built for the postseason, he's a player who doesn't produce in the postseason.

Actually, he is player who hasn't produced in the last few post seasons.

His numbers in the postseason are actually better than Jeter's if i am not mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...