Jump to content

Jake Arrieta - so frustrating to watch this guy pitch. Talented, but erratic. Will he ever put it to


BamaOsFan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Buck and Duke better be prepared to move on quickly from Jake. Outings like today are simply games we can't afford to have. We have too many other options, these games are too winnable and too important to lose, and we can't tax our bullpen every 5th day for a guy who crumbles with men on base, walks too many guys, and can't consistently pitch past the 5th inning.

Go Jurrjens, then Gausman, and soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see Arrieta ever putting it together, atleast as a SP. Too inconsistant. Many of pitchers with great stuff have failed. Usually you start to see some improvements from a guy. But Jake looks like the same as he always does. Is cruising for 3 or 4 innings, then loses command, and he cant stop the bleeding once it starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck and Duke better be prepared to move on quickly from Jake. Outings like today are simply games we can't afford to have. We have too many other options, these games are too winnable and too important to lose, and we can't tax our bullpen every 5th day for a guy who crumbles with men on base, walks too many guys, and can't consistently pitch past the 5th inning.

Go Jurrjens, then Gausman, and soon.

Yes. Let's quit on Arrieta after one inning that combined a couple bad pitches with some bad luck.

I'm abnormally patient, though. I'd give him two bad innings before releasing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck and Duke better be prepared to move on quickly from Jake. Outings like today are simply games we can't afford to have. We have too many other options, these games are too winnable and too important to lose, and we can't tax our bullpen every 5th day for a guy who crumbles with men on base, walks too many guys, and can't consistently pitch past the 5th inning.

Go Jurrjens, then Gausman, and soon.

This is why I always just shake my head when I heard people talking about the O's having so many options in the rotation. Like I said, theres a difference between quality depth, depth, and just havi.g arms to throw out there. The O's imo are somewhere between depth and just having arms to throw out there. The SP is where I was hoping the Orioles would improve on the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I'm done pulling for the guy. I'm all for supporting the whole team, but he is nothing but frustrating. Perhaps in a long reliever role when we are getting blown up or an emergency role he would do better. I just don't see him staying in the rotation for very long this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Let's quit on Arrieta after one inning that combined a couple bad pitches with some bad luck.

I'm abnormally patient, though. I'd give him two bad innings before releasing him.

This is a guy who has never shown he's capable of limiting walks and pitch counts, and never shown the consistent ability to work deep into games. He's only ever pitched well in spring training and even a stat-head such as yourself knows we can't put much stock into that.

I was on record saying Arrieta won't succeed in spring training when it became obvious the O's were going with him in the rotation. In the East every single win or loss makes a huge difference, and using Arrieta over our other options and being patient with him is inefficient and the wrong move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would trade Jake in a minute. He has been given plenty of opportunities to prove himself and he has failed. I hope the Orioles option him to Norfolk after the game. Roch mentioned this as a possibility in his blog today.

If this happens, they should force him to pitch out of the stretch all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Let's quit on Arrieta after one inning that combined a couple bad pitches with some bad luck.

I'm abnormally patient, though. I'd give him two bad innings before releasing him.

It's been more than just one bad inning. He's 27 years old and has shown zero improvement in three seasons. In fact, he's gotten progressively worse. His ERA+ has gone from 89 in 2010, 83 in 11, and 69 last year. At what point should the O's say enough is enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...