Jump to content

Jake Arrieta - so frustrating to watch this guy pitch. Talented, but erratic. Will he ever put it to


BamaOsFan

Recommended Posts

Frustrating, yes. Also, St. Nick looked like a slug going after that ball. For a split second it looked like Chris Davis (speed wise).

You talking about the triple? I just watched the replay and yeah, that had to have been a combo of him playing shallow and just not getting a good jump on the ball. The ball landed before the warning track. RF is not that big at Camden Yards, you need to get to that.

BUT Dozier is not a power hitter. I didn't see where Nick started off the play but I would guess he was shallow against the RH non-power hitter.

Also, the first run was scored on a hit in which Arrieta sawed off the hitter's bat. You don't get much worse luck than that. Break the hitter's bat in half and he hits an RBI single up the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree. I'm done pulling for the guy. I'm all for supporting the whole team, but he is nothing but frustrating. Perhaps in a long reliever role when we are getting blown up or an emergency role he would do better. I just don't see him staying in the rotation for very long this year.

Good grief you bail on the guy already? What kind of fan is that? This is the first game for him this season. Yes he can be frustrat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a guy who has never shown he's capable of limiting walks and pitch counts, and never shown the consistent ability to work deep into games. He's only ever pitched well in spring training and even a stat-head such as yourself knows we can't put much stock into that.

I was on record saying Arrieta won't succeed in spring training when it became obvious the O's were going with him in the rotation. In the East every single win or loss makes a huge difference, and using Arrieta over our other options and being patient with him is inefficient and the wrong move.

Yes. The Orioles are only starting him because he has blackmail pictures of Peter Angelos. He has no ability or hope. Buck is just a pawn in a sinister game. And Duquette.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been more than just one bad inning. He's 27 years old and has shown zero improvement in three seasons. In fact, he's gotten progressively worse. His ERA+ has gone from 89 in 2010, 83 in 11, and 69 last year. At what point should the O's say enough is enough?

You do realize that ERA or ERA+ are imperfect measures of talent and future outcomes, right? The Orioles will give him chances as long as they believe he gives them their best potential outcomes now and going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order for me to be frustrated, I need to have expectations.

With Arrieta, I have no expectations at all. He is what he is.

Really? I would have thought with Jake actually winning a rotation spot our expectations would be higher. No Matter, with Tillman and Johnson coming off the dl soon Jake could go back to Norfolk. Easy enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations on a truly terrible post.

I see the practice of equivocating an inability to iron out mechanics and command consistently with mental deficiency is alive and well.

Are you actually suggesting that a poor inning doesn't mean a ballplayer is a lazy psychopath? What insane world do you come from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am frustrated that Jake just walked the first guy he faced after the O's took him off the hook for his earlier bad inning. That really drives me nuts, and I recall Jake doing that last year and Buck nearly exploding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that ERA or ERA+ are imperfect measures of talent and future outcomes, right? The Orioles will give him chances as long as they believe he gives them their best potential outcomes now and going forward.

They won't believe that. He doesn't deserve repeated chances when all he's done is struggle, especially with other guys who deserve a shot and who have experience waiting to take his spot. And two prospects who could be much better options than him in a month or two.

He's put our bullpen in a precarious position for the rest of this series. This is a game we should win, but he's made this game close. The fact that he's done this over and over and over again isn't lost on Buck and Duke, especially Buck, who hates having to tax his bullpen unnecessarily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. The Orioles are only starting him because he has blackmail pictures of Peter Angelos. He has no ability or hope. Buck is just a pawn in a sinister game. And Duquette.

This is a ridiculous post. I never said, nor implied, anything of the sort.

I'm just saying the Orioles should be quick to move on. Honestly, I don't believe he should make another start until Jurrjens, Gausman, and Steve Johnson have all been given a shot. But I'm confident they will move away from Arrieta quickly, since Duquette has shown to be very pro-active when it comes to these decisions.

I'm very surprised someone as observant as you is so blind to Arrieta's mediocrity. Or so willing to forgive it and be patient with a guy who isn't a quality major league starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They won't believe that. He doesn't deserve repeated chances when all he's done is struggle, especially with other guys who deserve a shot and who have experience waiting to take his spot. And two prospects who could be much better options than him in a month or two.

He's put our bullpen in a precarious position for the rest of this series. This is a game we should win, but he's made this game close. The fact that he's done this over and over and over again isn't lost on Buck and Duke, especially Buck, who hates having to tax his bullpen unnecessarily.

So Buck and Duquette are starting him why? Are they not very bright, or just stuck because Matusz et al are even more ridiculously horriffic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations on a truly terrible post.

I see the practice of equivocating an inability to iron out mechanics and command consistently with mental deficiency is alive and well.

None of you guys ever saw Major League where Crash Davis says Nuke Laloosh has a million dollar arm and a ten cent head? A really talented guy who simply can't control it? It was just a reference to that adjusted for inflation. I didn't realize Jake's family posted here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Well, if you look back on prior posts that I have made to Roy, I specifically said in ONE prior post that he makes a lot of emo posts that are almost trolling in nature because of their extreme back and forth.   He can go from the Orioles are the best team ever to getting swept by the Yankees and they have no shot to win anything.   He has done this 100000000 times.   Which is fine.  I like Roy and he is very fervent and emotional about the Os.  My point was if it was anyone else making those same posts?  I have a feeling the reaction would not be so......muted. For example I made a thread last year in July or August that the Os would not win the WS, probably would not win a playoff series, and had a slight chance of missing the playoffs totally.  Very slight is what I said.  I also said that 'next year'.....as in the year we are in now, with the growth of the younger players like Cowser and Gunnar and hopefully with the addition of an ace (which we got with Burnes) the Os had a serious chance to win it all.  For making those bold predictions?  Which were all very logical?  I got crucified and almost banned on here.  Literally for that.  That specific thread.  Which in no way was anti Oriole. So you make the call.  
    • I think they meant to make the one they already use available to fans so we can abuse them on social media.
    • Is the grading system available to us actually accurate?  I don’t really know though I usually assume it is.  
    • Kill the Union and get rid of under performing umps.
    • BAL  5.0 proj. runs 6:45pm in 20m -1.5 (-130) (o/u 8.5) (-212)  # Player vs. R   1 Gunnar Henderson L  SS 2 Adley Rutschman L  C 3 Ryan O'Hearn L  DH 4 Ryan Mountcastle R  1B 5 Anthony Santander S  RF 6 Colton Cowser L  LF 7 Jordan Westburg R  2B 8 Cedric Mullins S  CF 9 Ramon Urias R  3B   Corbin Burnes R  SP  VERIFIED LINEUP @ WAS  3.5 proj. runs 76°           29% +1.5 (+110) (o/u 8.5) (+185)  # Player vs. R   1 Jacob Young R  CF 2 CJ Abrams L  SS 3 Luis V Garcia L  2B 4 Nick Senzel R  DH 5 Jesse Winker L  LF 6 Joey Meneses R  1B 7 Keibert Ruiz S  C 8 Eddie Rosario L  RF 9 Trey Lipscomb R  3B   Trevor Williams R  SP  VERIFIED LINEUP
    • Just for the sake of this thread's topic, suppose Robo Ump is completely off the table, for whatever reason. How do you improve the balls/strikes calling in MLB? Have MLB use the grading system available to us online to evaluate umps when they are behind the plate. Pay umpires a per game bonus when they are behind the plate. Use the grading system to set thresholds on correct called balls/strikes that umpires have to achieve. If they fall below a certain level, they get penalized First offense is a warning Second offense they get skipped on the next rotation, missing out on the per game bonus Third offense they miss out on home plate for a month Just spitballing. How could they improve strike calling if the Robo Ump is a no go?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...