Jump to content

Ryan Flaherty has to go.


Greg

Recommended Posts

Guest jtaz28

Clown, I highly dought the man can juggle or do balloon animals. Its early in the season lets not panic yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

There have been a couple of balls that Flaherty dove for that got up the middle that knocked in runs in these two games so far. Flaherty is taller than Casilla but Casilla is faster. Does anyone think Casilla would have got to those balls and at least knocked them down to keep the runs from scoring or possibly even made a play to get the hitter at 1B?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty has 10 at bats so far this year, so the problem with his hitting is relative small right now. However, the league appears to have adjusted to his ability to hit the fastball and he is seeing nothing of off speed stuff. He has to be able to adjust to that.

If he adjusts he should stay with the O's. If he doesn't he has options and can work on hitting off speed stuff at AAA. The O's have Casilla and Navarro that can get opportunities. Schoop probably needs to show he can hit AAA pitching before he gets a promotion. Schoop is currently 1 for 7 with a .143 average. He needs more time.

I think that is the theme for the whole situation. Everyone needs more time to see how this develops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's hit .208 in his career (80-ish games). What did you expect?

80 games, including a year jumping from AA, only means that at this point in his career you should trust the scouts, the analysts, and his MLEs more than you should trust his MLB numbers. I'm not one of the people who think Flaherty has great things ahead of him, but this early April jumping on and off of player bandwagons based on 10 at bats or five innings is both predictable and nonsensical. If Buck and Duquette were behind a guy's roster spot and playing time 48 hours ago they're not changing their minds in less than a week, and their overall opinions have only very slightly shifted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh, I remember the same threads last year...for about 4 months. And then I remember...

Him getting hot for a couple weeks. A couple of weeks that caused his OPS to skyrocket to....617.

Fun note his current OPS+ is -100, he may have broken that stat.

It is well known that I am not a Flaherty fan however you have to give the kid more then two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Him getting hot for a couple weeks. A couple of weeks that caused his OPS to skyrocket to....617.

Fun note his current OPS+ is -100, he may have broken that stat.

It is well known that I am not a Flaherty fan however you have to give the kid more then two games.

Not just a couple weeks. His OPS from ABs as a starter was somewhere in the .700s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...