Jump to content

Lough... leadoff... why?


Barnaby Graves

Recommended Posts

Consider the source. Jim Presley's career OBP was .290. His strikeout-to-walk ratio was worse than 4-to-1. He probably thinks that Willie McGee was the perfect lead-off hitter.

Fortunately, Jim Presley doesn't fill out the lineup card. Unfortunately, the O's offense is full of hitters who are carbon copies of Jim Presley--lots of power, no walks, low OBP. I don't see how Jim Presley is part of the solution for the team's OBP problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Consider the source. Jim Presley's career OBP was .290. His strikeout-to-walk ratio was worse than 4-to-1. He probably thinks that Willie McGee was the perfect lead-off hitter.

Fortunately, Jim Presley doesn't fill out the lineup card. Unfortunately, the O's offense is full of hitters who are carbon copies of Jim Presley--lots of power, no walks, low OBP. I don't see how Jim Presley is part of the solution for the team's OBP problems.

And yet the teams he has coached. Have been our best hitting Orioles teams since the middle of the first decade of the millennium. We can probably be pretty pleased with him. Eddie Murray was not a particularly good hitting coach. Great hitter though. You of all people should appreciate Presley ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick needs to hit leadoff all the time this year.

Totally agree, he's at his best when batting leadoff.

In the AL you dont need at speedster batting first. Nick is not an RBI guy and never seems right batting 3rd 5th or 6th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Buck really said was that Nick had been able to work out more fully this offseason, had put on about 10 pounds compared to his usual opening weight, and that Buck thinks he'll be able to run better, too. I doubt Buck has seen Nick run this offseason so I view his remark as speculative.

How much of the weight is hair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me skeptical on David Laugh as a better alternative to Nate Mclouth. In fact I have to be convinced this is a great acquisition at all. I'm open

to it, but I still think Reimold IF IF IF he can stay healthy is a better all around player than Lough. Also, Im very intrigued by what I hear about

Henry. I think Delmon Young is a roster filler at best.

I dont think Young makes this roster.

I think Berry will beat him out for the backup outfielder spot, but I am in the minority on that opinion in this board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may very well be right, there are allot of bodies completing for just a couple of roster spots.

Unless Young is mashing the ball, I don't see them keeping him over youth and speed, but again, my opinion.

Berry's a year older than Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me skeptical on David Laugh as a better alternative to Nate Mclouth. In fact I have to be convinced this is a great acquisition at all. I'm open

to it, but I still think Reimold IF IF IF he can stay healthy is a better all around player than Lough. Also, Im very intrigued by what I hear about

Henry. I think Delmon Young is a roster filler at best.

O's say Reimold is 100%. It's his job to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may very well be right, there are allot of bodies completing for just a couple of roster spots.

Unless Young is mashing the ball, I don't see them keeping him over youth and speed, but again, my opinion.

For four spots:

Lough

Young

Reimold

Pegeuro

Urrutia

Berry

Pearce

There's a lot of permutations that don't involve either Young or Berry. Among the speed/defense guys I rank their odds as Lough first, Peguero second, Berry third. They won't keep more than two of these, and maybe only one. That's how it looks to me, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...